putting out or even strongly held extremist political views don't -- shouldn't be conflated with junk science that's spread and results in our icus being overrun. so i do think americans and the courts correctly afford special protections or fidelity to medical information or the spread of junk science, as we're seeing with joe rogan. i would argue, look, if you can reverse engineer some of steve bannon's comments to injury from an insurrection, that's one thing. and that obviously the courts would have to figure that out. what i think that spotify will come under pressure for is when 270 doctors say that this is a real -- that joe rogan is a menace and we have 850,000 dead americans. more americans have died from covid than all combat fatalities combined in all of our conflicts. even section 230 has carveouts for sex trafficking, for ip violation. and i think it's just a