yet, but after she expressed some regret for the tone and content of her techs -- texts, she still won't admit there was fraud. she didn't see the debunking of the fraud that happened after these allegation were made but at least as far as i've seen won't come out and say that they were wrong about the fraud and that there was not enough fraud to impact the results of the election. so her regret only goes so far but what she's really trying to do is distance herself from her husband clarence thomas to avoid allegations that her work impacted his decisions on the court, especially with the pending case this term of the independent state legislatures, careful to say she wasn't speaking to state legislators about alternative slates of electors. all they were trying to do was gather these fraud allegations and see what could be done with them to explore whether there was fraud, not whether the state