so you hold an opposing view, is that correct, on access? - the idea behind the stream access law that if you stay in water, it's public-- i agree with that concept. - but where do you draw the line for private-property rights? if the state were to pass a law that your restroom was public because the public needed it, in your house-- - right! - oh, just because this isn't my backyard doesn't mean it's any less mine than your toilet is yours. we still pay taxes on every foot of it. - i'm an old-school lefty, but i got to say, i kind of completely understand the property owner's point of view here. there would be no ambiguity in my feeling if i inherited this land and it had been in my family for generations, and i looked around at it and wanted to keep it like it is... if i were to go to a bar in town and i would ask, "how do you feel about this issue?" where would it break? what would most people say? - it depends on if you're a fisherman or a landowner. - clearly divided right down the middle. - well, you know, a lot of people are gonna say, "when i was a kid, i used to be able to go hunt and fish, and i can't now, and stuff's getting closed off." i have some sympathy for that. - anybody that's not complying with stream access