it wasn't just that she had a heart attack. it was she had a heart attack because of these drugs. and when they make the connections and connect the dots to show how he was involved and not just what drugs she took but how she actually took the drugs, i think they are going to weigh and consider that. and it's going to hurt him. and the statements like that that come in against him, they're certainly not going to help him in his defense. there's got to be something they've got to consider and it makes a difference to the case. >> danny, what about the presence of this mistress gypsy? >> well, we've seen many defendants unfortunately in america it's a fact of life that people engage in nonsense with mistresses or whoever. and we've seen a lot of defense. that's the prosecution's chief motive here. and the problem is, the prosecution has to hope that that motive is so powerful and this behavior is so odd and unexplainable that it will get them over the fact that they simply do not have science in their favor. you look for the defense to absolutely hammer home the fact that each of these medical examiners never conclusively really said that cardiac arrythmia could be ruled out as