it is the fbi's number one priority to prevent acts of terrorism in the united states. we had a massive act of domestic terrorism on our very capitol grounds. so that is a failure by definition. we have not yet heard from the fbi or from director wray exactly what they think led to that failure. i think many of the senior leadership public responses and testimony has been defensive rather than transparent. and so, a year after this attack, we are still left wondering, what happened inside the fbi, inside dhs, that led to this massive oversight? and that is very concerning. >> do you think from the law enforcement standpoint that, you know, these extremist groups are more closely watched now? that we know more about the potential threats? >> i have no doubt. i'm quite confident that at least within the fbi resources were likely reprogrammed, strengths and the attention of our analysts and our agents have been trained much more seriously on the domestic terrorist threat. and director wray has head of to that effect. the question is, what were the underlying assumptions?