information. they said they had conferred with the ntsb, the faa, boeing and others. and they found better data, better coordinates. and that's really what a good investigation has to do. if your data is bad you have to be willing to throw it out along with all your preconceived notions, particularly if you've got any piece of data you were hanging on to that was your anchor you have to be willing to throw that out. i think that actually is signs of a healthy investigation. they said hey we have better data. it's time to change our coordinates. >> again, miles, we're getting pictures from aircraft. we saw that rectangular object that was spotted. does that look like something to you? >> well, we've been talking about it all day of course. one thing i don't know the scale, is that the size of a lottery ticket or a refrigerator door? i'm not sure. somebody tweeted at me and said is that a lavatory door from the airplane? i'm not sure it would float but potentially. but generally speaking, rectangular objects we don't associate with the outer skin of an aircraft which will be curved