>> self-defense use of deadly force or nondeadly force, the way the statute reads you get that sentence in there that says you have no duty to retreat. you can stand your ground. here is a solution. let's do it together, you ready? there is no reason why that sentence should be in a jury instruction if there are no facts that support the contention of stand your ground. so i believe it should be taken out of the jury instruction and only put in if the facts support it. we do that with many other injury instructions. that would take the issue out. i don't think the zimmerman jury or the dunn jury got confused by it. >> i think they understood that. >> but i hear you. if we take that out nobody could say that there is confusion because it won't be there.