Megan what it is talking about is he is facing a different set of challenges. He is facing a state department that was upended. He was cut out of the loop on a travel ban for people from seven predominantly muslim countries. It is an unprecedented situation. So while he is bringing in ceo management techniques, his reception in foggy bottom has been quite positive. The challenge is not what we would expect it. The challenge is getting traction in the administration for a type of leadership style and development of americas foreignpolicy. He is still building out his own structure and face time within the administration. Oliver lets move to companies and industries. In the realm of health care and drug prices, you look at one part of it, the middleman. Megan a littleknown aspect of how our drug system works, and something that is under tremendous scrutiny with the price rises we have seen for certain drugs, and politicians donald trump on down kind of looking at this practice. These are companies that sit in the middle and negotiate between drugmakers and pharmacies. Sometimes taking the difference between the price of the drug from the manufacturer and the price for consumers, sometimes using clawbacks to benefit their bottom line. That is their business. Our pharmacy benefit managers keeping prices down for consumers, helping companies when they help manage their drug programs for employees, or other part of the problem that leads to price increases . There are people on both sides of the arguments. Some use the argument with caterpillar who basically dispensed with them. Took it into their own hands. That is a fight that is a corner of this market. 15 out of every 100 goes to pbms. Thats compared with four dollars and other countries. It is something that this article shines a light on. Carol interesting to see how caterpillar cut back on their costs. This cover story is an individual liked by the president , like by steve bannon, a true insider. Steve miller. Megan he was one of the most experience government hands in the administration. It delves into is he the thinking man. It is a fascinating look at him and a portrait of him, this star figure in the administration. Oliver he is an interesting character. We talked to reporter josh green. He is a longtime congressional staffer working for jeff sessions. He spent his entire career in washington on the far fringes of national politics, but because hes signed on early with trump and help to shape drums antiimmigration worldview, he has ended up in a remarkably senior position. I mean, hes 31yearsold. Carol i love your story. Is it because of his association with sessions that he got to trump so quickly . His association with sessions and his association with steve bannon, trumps chief strategist. Sessions was the first mainstream politician to come out and endorse donald trump. He appeared at his rally and alabama, and that showed people i think that there was an element in the Republican Base that really liked what trump was saying when not too many people, especially in the media, took him seriously. Miller is somebody who has spent years developing sessions worldview, plotting ways to restrict immigration, tight labor markets. He put together the pieces of what the white house is calling economic nationalism, and so once trump needed a speechwriter, miller was an obvious person to fill that role. Carol you talk about all of these important people within President Trumps inner circle, but the big difference with miller is he has government experience. When you look at how many people had never worked a day in government before. It is very difficult to legislate, and miller is one of the only people in the senior levels of the white house who has any experience in congress at all. The difficulty for miller and for trump as i point out in this piece is that millers time in the senate was mostly spent halting president obamas agenda, knocked down immigration reform, which she was successful in doing, let sessions has never had a resume as an actual legislature, and one of the reasons we have seen the agenda stall is that there arent people who have experience passing laws. Oliver he has found a unique spot, as trumps sort of henchman to go to the morning shows and take the beatings and recite the president s agenda. Tell us about his new public role. One main problem the white house has had is they dont have people who can effectively communicate trumps. Sean spicer, the press secretary, is famously flustered at the podium. He has been mocked on saturday night live. Kellyanne conway gets in trouble every time she goes on tv. She was cited by the Government Office of ethics for hawking ivanka trumps clothing line. Miller is an effective communicator because ever since he was a teenager, he has been a regular voice on rightwing talk radio and is clear. He has a black and white view of the world, and he is used to debating and arguing with people as we seen on the sunday shows, and if theres one thing we know President Trump loves is his people on tv making a forceful, forthright case for his policies, and that helps to explain miller success in the white house despite missteps. Oliver turning Stephen Miller into a cover model was the job of rob vargas. Rob the headlines came up with this great title, the minister of truth and it plays to his somewhat aggressive personality and the way he defends trump and defends how truthful the things trump says are. He has this almost like very militant vibe to him. In the design of world constructivism, it is kind of big, so i decided to apply that treatment to the headline. Oliver the constructivism is the color scheme, the block layout . Rob it is meant to convey a message very clearly and boldly, and i think that is the essence of Stephen Miller. He doesnt mince words. He doesnt hold back, and there is a slight propaganda element to that, and so it felt appropriate for the subject matter. Carol up next, if not doddfrank, then what . We look at financial reform under a republican controlled congress. Oliver and why some republican lawmakers are backing away from repealing obamacare. Carol this is Bloomberg Businessweek. Carol welcome back to Bloomberg Businessweek. I am carol massar. Oliver i am oliver renick. Carol in the markets and finance section, banking reform under a republican controlled congress. Oliver we look at what conservative banking regulation may or may not look like. Not only will doddfrank not be repealed and replaced this year, it might never be repealed and replaced. We might see some tweaks around the edges. I cant say for sure. No one knows what they have in washington but there is a good chance he wont come close to getting rid of doddfrank. Oliver how much of this will be a result of the surrounding him . Stephen mnuchins testimony, they ask him about doddfrank him and he did not seem like he wanted to tear the entire thing up. Some of the language from some of trumps official seems to be not quite as extreme. Gary cohn see some value in doddfrank, while criticizing others. These are wall street types who dont like heavy regulation. I want to get into the general concept here. There are two approaches to financial regulation. The democratic approach is basically you regulate. These firms screwed up and brought the world into a financial crisis, and now we need to supervise them very tightly. The republican approach is that is what markets are for. We can harness the free market by getting shareholders to discipline their unmanaged ends and the way you get shareholders to have a bigger stake is to have higher capital standards. That is the difference between the assets and liabilities. The leading bill that is in the house belongs to the head of the House Financial Services committee. It gives firms an offramp from some of the supervision at the largest firms if they have a high leverage ratio, which is to say a high amount of capital on their books. Carol how much political will is there to do something within congress . Everybody wants to say they did something to when push comes to shove, there is not agreement on what to do. Even if they manage to get something through the house, they dont have enough votes to get it through the senate, and it doesnt seem as if any of these wavering centrist democrats are willing to go along with a major repeal of doddfrank. Carol i also wonder about the financial firms. Doddfrank was a huge piece of legislation. There is a lot of stuff in there, 70 to 80 has been implemented by financial firms. Whether or not they are willing to start rolling back is a question. That is a good point. One of the people i talked to was the head of the clearinghouse association. He told me, well, repeating doddfrank is not the top of our list on things we want to do. What bothers them the most are the capital tests the fed reserve is putting on. Dan tarullo, the vice chairman of the fed, is leaving now, and the hope of the clearinghouse and other groups is if trump manages to appoint 3 new fed governors, he might be able to twist the dial more towards easier capital regulation, which is even more important for the banks to get rid of doddfrank. Oliver how planned parenthood is turning out to be a landmine for republicans looking to repeal obamacare. It is definitely proving harder than i think trump and republicans in congress expected. What is making it even harder is the insistence by some of the most conservative members of the house to insert language into any repeal bill that the funds that defunds planned parenthood, a nonstarter for the senate, but a core issue for your Tea Party Wing or Freedom Caucus part of the house. They want to do this simultaneously. These are two objectives they have long held out. They have the power to do both, but if you try to do them together, planned parenthood can end up being this political landmine that causes problems through the spring. Oliver so here is what i think is interesting. If you have agreement among republicans, and this is an important topic they all want to get defunded, then where does the political landmine part of it come into account . Is it that you will get zero democrats on board with any change in obamacare . Are their opinions about planned parenthood within the Republican Party . Where is the gridlock . Sure, the Freedom Caucus is your Tea Party Wing, your hard right flank of House Republican majority. They have enough votes, they are big enough, to determine that any sort of repeal bill gets out of the house has to get through them. They are insisting that any repeal bill must defund planned parenthood. That is a nonstarter with the senate. Any repeal bill that comes out of the house and lands in the senate and of funds planned parenthood is going to have a difficult time getting passed because the majority is so much then are over there. You have had two republicans in the senate who have said they are not cool with Defunding Planned Parenthood as part of obamacare. Oliver so there is some Division Within the ranks. They have a pretty thin margin here. Is it do or die for those people . Can they work in some language that is partial or in between . Some members of the Freedom Caucus are drawing lines, saying we will no agree to any of obama care repeal the does not include provisions to defund planned parenthood. They do have the numbers to hold that up, and this is a problem that is presenting itself at the feet of House Speaker paul ryan. He has to get them in line. It is not clear they will play ball. Carol up next, the protectionist movement in one of the worlds most open and liberal societies, the netherlands. Oliver and the dramatic last hours of a miner working on behalf of workers. This is bloomberg. Oliver welcome back to Bloomberg Businessweek. I am oliver renick. Carol i am carol massar. You can also listen to us on the radio. Oliver and in london, and in asia on the Bloomberg Radio plus app. And the politics and policy section, the netherlands has been a center for global trade. Carol the forces of protectionism and nationalism have gained a foothold there, especially rotterdam. I find this fascinating. Until 2004, it was the Worlds Largest port, and it provides 130,000 jobs in a city of 600,000. It is a huge cog in globalization and the city is dependent on it, and yet it is the city where this populist movement and the netherlands grew up. You have this juxtaposition that at face value is difficult understand. Carol we kind of know what the pushback against globalization looks like in the United States and how it has affected our elections. What does nationalism look like in the netherlands . It is a little bit different. The netherlands is in a way the starting place of liberalism. For hundreds of years, this was a place where if you were religiously persecuted in europe, you would go to the netherlands. It was always an open trading country. It never grew up as a feudal system that existed in the rest of the world, and more recently, it is famous for lacks attitude towards regulating prostitution, softer drugs, and so on, so you have this place that is very liberal, if you like. It is truly ingrained, and if nationalism is a decision, we want to go back to what we were before, this golden era some time ago. In the netherlands, oddly enough, different than a lot of countries, that golden era looks quite liberal, so even the nationalists and populous in the netherlands, they can be quite liberal on some social issue. So for example, a populist leader who grew up in the early 2000s in rotterdam, he was shot dead and assassinated in 2002. But he was flamboyantly gay, so what really angered him about muslim immigration was that here was this foreign culture that was encroaching on his house. You go down a few streets from his house and all the doorbells have names that are arabic names, turkish names, what ever, and he found this threatening because he felt the dutch people were being forced to change their way of life because these immigrants came and were trying to impose their own way of life. Oliver in the features section, a story about another kind of politician, a formal bolivian vice minister for internal affairs. Carol and his work as an advocate for miners would ultimately get him killed. There was a conflict surrounding a new mining law that the president had put into effect last year, and one of the things the mining law stipulated was that cooperatives could not go into partnerships with private companies, and this created a lot of tension. The mining corporations started to view morales the supported as they helped elect him, he was basically a president who went into office elected by people who are exactly like the miners, poor workers, largely indigenous, and they supported him, but as morales, his term went on over the years, people started to look at him as a populist authoritarian, that he was trying to take more control of more sectors of the economy. The miners saw this attempt to prevent them from joining partnerships with private companies as something that would basically kill their productivity. They said they needed to go into these partnerships for the equipment the private companies could give them for the investment, and they saw this as an attempted state takeover of their sector by morales. Essentially they turned on him, and so there was a growing conflict, growing tension, between these miners and morales, and it erupted in protest last august when the miners block the highways to protest. These were some of the most busy highways in bolivia, so it did paralyze parts of the country. Interestingly enough, it was the same sort of protest that morales came to power on. Carol conflicting stories about what led to his death and whether or not the president was involved in allowing his death for his own political gain . Yeah, what is interesting about this is that the murder was so shocking that in the aftermath of it, bolivians really kind of looked at this as a chance to dissect what was going on in their country, and so different groups in the country basically depending on whether you are a backer of morales or an opponent took widely different views of what caused this murder. So morales for example blamed the murder on external forces. He said the cooperatives had been manipulated by outside u. S. Backed private companies who wanted to foment dissent within the cooperatives so that they would rise up against him. So he sort of blamed outsiders on this. The people who were the opponents of morales blamed the president for basically throwing Rodolfo Illanes to the dogs. They said he knew he would get hurt and that would allow morales to kind of ride a wave of popular outrage against the cooperatives and use that to his benefit, so there are kind of conflicting conspiracy theories that have popped up out of this. Carol up next, can you to persuade its peers to pay for tv . Oliver this is Bloomberg Businessweek. Oliver welcome to Bloomberg Businessweek. I am oliver renick. Carol i am carol massar. Still ahead in this weeks issue a call to end south korean , conglomerates again. What to wear on job interviews this spring. Oliver all ahead on Bloomberg Businessweek. Oliver we are back with megan murphy to talk about some must reads in the magazine. Lets talk about conglomerates in south korea and the sprawling influence they have. Megan the article goes into this system in south korea of familyrun conglomerates. Hyundai is one. This goes into how over decades they have had a stranglehold on industries in south korea, but they continually face pressure from allegations of corruption, bribery, improper involvement with the government. Right now we are going to one of those phases about how this is with samsung, and it is talking about how it is almost known and accepted that it exists and people really dont view this as a Major Business threat. What is interesting is on the political side how this goes all the way up to the president , so animating the left to push for change on the system which has squeezed corporate profit in the country. Carol there is a story about uber, one of the cofounders of uber, just when you thought the year could not get worse, it can. Megan the original title of the story was terrible, no good, horrible month for travis. There is this video that bloomberg did get that shows him in an angry dispute with one of his drivers, one of the drivers of uber black, and the thing is that he is a polarizing personality to put it mildly. , he built this country which company which has made its , money by pushing boundaries and pushing regulation, blasting or blow torching through walls. Whether that as competitors or regulators, but the price of that is you have a lot of people who frankly dont like you very much, and they are facing allegations of systemic Sexual Harassment with the company, which he has pledged to address. He has brought in Arianna Huffington to lead a probe. This came to want from one of their women engineers. They are facing a lawsuit from google about their self driving car platform, and this now shows travis defending his business, but if you are looking at this and you are an antitravis brings that everything you suspected about him, that it is travis first and uber first and his workers. Workers second. Oliver it is fascinating to see how the skills that helped him take where the company is today, im going to get this done, rough and tumble pushback. It is now that voraciousness and pugnaciousness it is sort of holding him back now in a sense and the public is pushing back against it. Megan he needs to understand what its like to take himself to the next level. Hes not the leader of a startup in silicon valley. He is the leader of a huge company with an impressive valuation on the street. It is challenging for many leaders, but he does recognize that the Sexual Harassment issue is a problem. You hear from women throughout Tech Companies in silicon valley. They are not alone. He will be judged from this moment. Either leaders come together for their employees and take their Company Forward on a different path, or sometimes you see them crumble. Oliver lets talk about youtube. Kind of losing the you and just becoming the tube. [laughter] megan this is youtube giving tv channels, calling it a skinny bundle, hoping millennials are watching everything on mobile. They are not the first into the market and will not be the last but it is ambitious. Worked on it for two years. Whether millennials ready to pay for 35 tv channels on 35 mobile, it sounds interesting. It will be interesting to see whether they migrate to that. It is an interesting test for the company, another Big TechnologyCompany Facing a test. Carol a reporter tried out youtube tv and we caught up with him. Youtube is launching a virtual Cable Tv Service basically, overthetop, skinny bundle. You pay them 35 a month and you get the four top broadcast networks, abc, cbs, nbc, and fox and then about 35 or so of their , affiliated Cable Networks. There is no longterm contracts, and when you talk to youtube executives about this, they basically say we have been wanting to this for 6, 7, 8 years and it is finally coming , to pass, and we think this will be a simplification of the tv experience. It will bring together all of your traditional tv and your online tv, one simple app. Carol who is going to hate youtube in this process . Youtube tv . The Cable Networks . Who is it . They will be competing most directly over the past two years, there has been a number of these Similar Services that have launched. Dish launched two years ago, then at t jumped in with directv now, and sony has playstation vue, so they will be competing with other services. Hulu is supposed to launch a Similar Service later this year, and then at the same time they are competing with traditional cable and satellite tv providers at some level. Oliver lets talk about the popularity of those items. You have some numbers in your story and i want you to give us some color on that. You talk about playstation vue, they are one of the smaller ones, directv, couple hundred thousand customers. What kind of numbers are these . They seem miniscule. It has been slow for the adoption of these services. Sling tv, the first one to launch, it has been two years. They have upwards of one million customers. It is not much but you think , about the overall market, there are 120 households in the United States with some form of tv. So none of these services have been a huge home run yet. Carol does that mean they are not profitable . Cracks yeah. Yeah. I dont think anybody is making money from these services. You talk to analysts they will say these are loss leaders for these companies. They would not be able to exist on their loan because they charge too little. The prices are still low, 20, 30, 40 a month, and the distributors are still having to pay for what is very expensive programming. Carol what is the holy grail here . You write in your story that even apple, microsoft, amazon, everybody is doing this. Interested ins this. It is kind of public publicist. Puzzling puzzling. Why does everyone want to distribute the cable bundle . From youtubes and googles perspective, they think it makes sense because youtube has had this long ambition to be the one place you go for every kind of video in the world, and they pretty much have everything except your traditional tv packages. So they are completing the whole menu. From another perspective, google is a huge advertising company, and this gives them entree into this large, live, Linear Television market. For the time being they will not , have a lot of control over the tv ads you see from the start, but they will get that data and more information. Carol up next, an unlikely Development Battle in los angeles. Oliver plus, Artificial Intelligence moves to the tennis court. Carol this is Bloomberg Businessweek. Oliver welcome back to Bloomberg Businessweek. I am oliver renick. Carol i am carol massar. In the markets and finance section in los angeles, a proposed construction ban hitting builders, the mayor, and advocates for the homeless against the aids Health Care Foundation in los angeles. It is an interesting, complicated ballot measure debate we are having in los angeles. Which is nothing new. The city has new development all the time, and the zoning laws havent been changed in 20 years, so there is constantly animosity about whether to build or not build. The interesting thing about this one is that the plans propose, proposed, measure s, would stop most development in the city for two years, and the primary Funding Party to this ballot measure is the aids Health Care Foundation. The foundation has given 4. 6 million, almost 99 of the funds in support of this measure, which is interesting. Carol the question i wrote is what is up with that . Oliver i thought it was a typo that it was funded by an aids foundation. Carol im thinking if i give money to support this Foundation Organization and support this cause and then find out it is going to political usage to support a ballot issue to do with development in the valley, i dont know i would feel so good about that. That has been a big point of contention. The aids foundation and their president say they want to use this moratorium on building to give the city council a chance to take a step back, reexamine the zoning laws, and change the general plan of the city. He says he wants to take give a voice to people in need of affordable housing, the homeless population, but critics have noticed that quite a significant sum of money, and granted, the aids Health Care Foundation had over one billion dollars this year, so it is a small percentage, but 4. 6 million is a lot of money. Carol why is this foundation involved in an issue having to do it l. A. Development . As i mentioned, they say they want to take a chance to give the city council the opportunity to read to the zoning laws, but critics have noticed that in redo the zoning laws, but critics have noticed that in about spring of michael 2015, weinstein and the aids Health Care Foundation filed a lawsuit against a developer that was building two luxury highrise apartments right next door to their hollywood offices. They claimed these buildings broke the law and were outside the zoning laws, and has succeeded in pausing this development, and critics have said that measure s and the aids Health Care Foundation support of this measure have been a succession of that an extension of that. If they do not 68 in stopping these highrise luxury apartment, they want to stop all development in the city. That is what critics are saying. Oliver a french inventor could put an end to fighting on the tennis court using Artificial Intelligence. This french guy has cooked up a 200 gopro sized device that can match the ai tennis line reading capabilities of more expensive camera setups. Carol do you play tennis . A little bit. Carol what is this called . In out . In out. Oliver either the ball is in or out . Yes. Oliver is this making ball boys irrelevant . It is giving you realtime stats on where your shots are landing within a 20 millimeter margin of error and how fast spinning and what direction and that kind of stuff. Carol when people play tennis they often kind of fight over or debate that was in, that was out. Did you take a look at it . Did it look well . How does it work . Reporter ashlee vance went to meet with him and shoot with him for an hour or so. He did not miss any shots, but every time the reported, the device would be to indicate the call was out or wide. Oliver i like you phrased it that way. Tell us about the origin here. He is not really a renowned inventor. Hes not a big programmer. It seems like this is something that came about for him. Right, it wasnt a particularly wellknown guy, but born in paris and describes himself as having been raised on clay. All of her the court, right . Oliver the court, right . Yeah. There are a lot of stories about arguments or heated arguments with friends and family that started with a mark on somebodys shoe. Carol is it expensive, this device . No, the big appeal the technology has been available and some form or another for a few years but at higher prices. Sony manages show courts for grand slam tournaments with a network of a dozen or more cameras, call the hawkeye system, and that sort of thing is more accurate than what we are talking about here, a margin of of error of three millimeters as opposed to 20 or so, but by the same token, that system costs 60,000 to set up. If you want to set up this kind of line reading for your own home matches, you pay 200 for this thing you connect to the net and presses the button. Oliver we are talking millimeters. Thats right. Oliver thats crazy. Inout hooks up to the net itself. So then tell us how the cameras work. Where is it looking . Is it just about whether it falls out on one end . Is it taking the entire shape of the playing area into account . There is one camera facing each direction when you hook it to the net. It will scan the lines to get a clear reading of where everything is, and then will track the balls in either direction as they are moving across the court. The one Technical Glitch that in doubles play, it can be tough for one of these in outs to account for the Second Player on one side of the court. So the inventor says for doubles play, buy two. Youre out 400 as opposed to 60 grand. Oliver Norman Foster talks about what makes a green airport. Carol plus the very best of spring fashion. That is ahead on Bloomberg Businessweek. Carol welcome back to Bloomberg Businessweek. I am carol massar. Oliver i am oliver renick. You can also catch us on the radio on sirius xm 119, 99. 1 in washington, d. C. Carol and in london and asia on the Bloomberg Radio plus app. Oliver in the focus on infrastructure session, a q a with british architect Norman Foster, the goto for building airports. He is an 81yearold architect who is probably one of the most famous living architects and most prolific living architects on the planet. He has designed everything from a building in germany to apartment towers in china, to bloomberg headquarters in london. Oliver i did not even realize his age, but it is pretty impressive now that you mention it. He is very excited. You can feel the excitement emanating from this project, a new airport in mexico city. That is exactly right. He just won the competition to build this airport of tomorrow for mexico city in conjunction with this architect, Fernando Rivera who is carlos slims , soninlaw, carlos slim being the mexican billionaire. And this is not lord fosters first airport. He actually trained as an raf pilot, and so flies himself, or at least flew himself, and has designed a dizzying array of airports. If you think about the number of new airports that have gone up in the last couple of decades, theres not that many come and he has managed to design airports in hong kong. He redid stan said airport, his first airport. He has done 67 airports and designed several more. Carol we want to get into the design for mexico city, but is he known for a certain type of architecture . Are there certain things he does that you will always see . I think that anything i would say it would be fundamentally wrong because he has done so many and for so many different projects. Carol so not necessarily predictable . Not necessarily predictable. That said, he does favor transparency, glassy spaces, kind of sweeping, cathedrallike interiors, so that is not a type of every building he has done, but you certainly dont see closed, heavy spaces. Carol which is what you often feel in an airport. Oliver that is the opposite. He is trying to create some space. Lets talk about the design. It looks really cool. You can see the photos in businessweek online. This is the rendering right now, because we obviously have not started building yet, but what we have presented is something with a lot of transparency to it, and it has this huge open area, multiple football fields. It is over 400,000 square meters, over a million square feet, and it is designed to it is supposed to be built in 2022 or 2020, but it is designed to work 4050 years into the future, so they want to be able to accommodate growth and capacity that will reflect an increasing propensity for global air travel, and so he has designed this colossal space that really does seem like a Massive Convention center as opposed to an airport itself. That said, his entire practice is about trying to make more intuitive things in airports and a smoother sort of arrival to gate to plane experience. So it is giant, but at least the way the renderings show it, you will not feel that way as you are wandering through. Carol speaking of design, lets get to the etc. Section and the annual look at spring fashion. The thing you want to put out when you put together the wardrobe for the office is most of us are inclined to wear very traditional stuff, stuff we find to be what our peers are wearing. What we have done here is the drought have to take some of the runway styles and make them more office appropriate and applicable, and we do that with everything from victorian victorino to what we are seeing on florals that we are seeing on women on the runway to what we are calling sort of a utilitarian chic for guys. Carol you have one section that is white, layering for women, kind of interesting. We are seeing a lot of that and we are seeing angles we have not seen before. With men, we are looking at a wide leg pant. This is after a decade plus of skinny jeans, so guys should be happy about this. All shapes and sizes, and we are also seeing lines verticals and horizontals mixed and matched, which people tend to shy away from because they think they will screw it up. There is also a lot of ways to make that work. Oliver i have to address my favorite one, hawaii 17oh. There looking back at comeback of the hawaiian shirt. We are very much back with the hawaiian shirt. The thing to keep in mind one, you want to make sure the rest of your outfit is tame. Do not want it pattern that pattern clash with something else. Also, it has to be tailored. Carol i also like covering the great outdoors, bringing it into the office. Kind of like hiking gear. Oliver utilitarian part, you have pockets. Pockets are good. You want to think about things you might wear outdoors and the ways they are being tailormade towards office appropriate gear, and you do see a lot of the pockets that you might see on safari gear working its way into office apparel. Carol a lot of this is taking cues from the Fashion Shows in new york and paris, making it more appropriate for the office. Right. The key is to look at what is going on on the runways, then process it, let it marinate, then distill it a little bit so you can apply to a wardrobe and away you are comfortable with. Carol Bloomberg Businessweek is available on business stands now. Oliver also online at bloomberg. Com. A lot of great stories, but what was your favorite . Carol opening remarks. We heard about it. It takes a look at Rex Tillerson doing his job as secretary of state. Some say he has the perfect skills and demeanor. Others say he may have party already been sidelined by the white house. There is speculation that in order to do the job, he will have to defy the man who gave him that job. We are talking about donald trump. That could be difficult. How about you . Oliver i enjoyed the story, a tragic story, about the bolivian Government Official and the complications surrounding his murder. It is an interesting look at how the commodities industry plays an integral role to politics and government in third world countries especially in latin , america. It is a tragic story, but compelling. Carol it raises questions about the president himself. Oliver absolutely. More Bloomberg Television starts right now. Titles lowers expectations for growth this year. The emphasis will be on reducing risk. Delivering an unmistakable message. President is firmly in control. Yellen warns there is a danger in acting too late. Confirmingsche bank plans to raise capital as the ceo plans to change course