full facts but i think not. could the company spin this? or does this not apply for these agency workers? tt does this not apply for these agency workers?— agency workers? it is definitely _ agency workers? it is definitely not - agency workers? it is definitely not a - agency workers? it is definitely not a fire . agency workers? it is l definitely not a fire and rehire. from what i have heard, there is no chance of these employees of being rehired on similar or less terms. rather, it is a redundancy and it is under the law. if p&0 decide they do not need their own employees to do the jobs that were being done and they were going to use a third—party provider, then that is a situation of redundancy under the law. a , situation of redundancy under the law. , ., , situation of redundancy under thelaw. i. , j~:::: the law. many of these 800 workers. — the law. many of these 800 workers, they _ the law. many of these 800 workers, they will _ the law. many of these 800 workers, they will have - the law. many of these 800j workers, they will have bills and mortgages. we are talking endlessly about the rising cost of living. this is a terrifying situation for workers to bn. if you were their lawyer, how confident would you be that they have a successful unfair