To tightrope to pretty much all these to tightrope to pretty much all these actions and explain his motivations and one of the most dramatic motivations and one of the most dramatic moments, we heard a prosecutor dramatic moments, we heard a Prosecutor Reading out the transcript of that infamous access hollywood tape, the recording of trump hollywood tape, the recording of trump that was released right before the election where we heard him talk about the election where we heard him talk about grabbing women without their consent about grabbing women without their consent it about grabbing women without their consent. It was really tense in the courtroom, consent. It was really tense in the courtroom, to showing how powerful that piece courtroom, to showing how powerful that piece of evidence will be later~ that piece of evidence will be later. fif that piece of evidence will be later. , ,. , later. Of course, the burden of roof is later. Of course, the burden of proof is on later. Of course, the burden of proof is on the later. Of course, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, i later. Of course, the burden of| proof is on the prosecution, but trump needs to so i left out. How did they do on that . Trump needs to so i left out. How did they do on that . Trumps lawyer basically went did they do on that . Trumps lawyer basically went about did they do on that . Trumps lawyer basically went about injecting did they do on that . Trumps lawyer basically went about injecting as basically went about injecting as much basically went about injecting as much doubt as he could into what prosecutors had just told the jury, going prosecutors had just told the jury, going point by point questioning the integrity of Star Witness Michael cohen, integrity of Star Witness Michael cohen, saying that what they were calling cohen, saying that what they were calling Election Variance was just normal calling Election Variance was just normal business. And the lawyer reminded normal business. And the lawyer reminded the jury that his client was innocent and saying the prosecution would not meet the high bar to prosecution would not meet the high bar to prove he was guilty. Both