comparemela.com

This morning, gromit. Id like a three minute egg. Steady on gromiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit Park Cast Him as the voice of his plasticine character Wallace Peter sallis was an automatic choice for the part. Cracking toast, gromit. I feel very grateful, not only the richness and the charm that he brought to wallace, and the humour, but alsojust knowing such a lovely man off screen as well was wonderful, and a great privilege. Here we go, then. Few actors are lucky enough to win two such wonderful parts. Peter sallis was a modest man, not unlike the characters he created, but a talented one as well. Well, you said reverse. I have been speaking to the creator of the days of summer him part. It was always going to for the part. It was always going to bea for the part. It was always going to be a perfect fit. He used to get best lines. Used to say the things that i wanted to say and he was a lwa ys that i wanted to say and he was always immaculate in everything he did. His personality was so suited to that part. And he brought a ge ntle ness to that part. And he brought a gentleness and as sort of a wistful innocence that really summed up the whole programme. I think so. Thats fairly true i think, yes. He had that kind of personality. He was almost in dickensian character. He could have been mr pickwick for real. Is dickens had seen him. Then he goes on to more fame in wallace and gromit. The play i wrote to him before some are wine came along, he played something quite sinister, which he could do. He was a very flexible actor. And your passed away but he g a now. He has passed away but he led a life that gave a lot of people a lot of joy. Indeed he life that gave a lot of people a lot ofjoy. Indeed he did life that gave a lot of people a lot of joy. Indeed he did and life that gave a lot of people a lot ofjoy. Indeed he did and i would like just to ofjoy. Indeed he did and i would likejust to mention his bravery, it a lwa ys likejust to mention his bravery, it always interested me. For many yea rs, always interested me. For many years, he had great difficulties with his eyes, he couldnt see very well at all, enormous problems. And i never once heard him moan or complain, hejust i never once heard him moan or complain, he just soldiered i never once heard him moan or complain, hejust soldiered on. I never once heard him moan or complain, he just soldiered on. The papers is coming up. With heavy rain and strong winds in the forecast, you could see some disruption to travel over the next 24 disruption to travel over the next 2a hours. Perhaps the rain and wind Strong Enough to down to some trees. We have low pressure pushing northwards and eastwards across the country during the past few hours. Through tuesday morning, the area brings out breach of rain through many parts of the country. Outbreaks. They will be brighter conditions moving in from the west. Lets look at 8am for the morning commute. Cloudy for the midlands with patchy outbreaks of rain. More sunshine as the head south west. Sunny spells, scattered showers, still windy around the exposed coasts and hills. But whether continuing around north of england. Northern ireland will be tried with sunshine but scotland is sitting underneath the cloud with outbreaks of rain. The area of Rain Nudges Northwards and eastwards and the south western half of the uk sees a to sunshine and showers at the strength of the wind could be gusting up to 50 mph, even inland. A windy day on tuesday and it will feel cooler than it has been recently with temperatures between 13 and 80 degrees. Particularly cool though you are stuck under cloud will stop the scotland, the rain lingers on. Elsewhere across the country, a return to clearer conditions and less windy. Temperatures overnight down to about nine or ten. Wednesday will be an improving sort of day down to the Fa Ct Improving Sort of day down to the fact that this area of low across northern and eastern come across northern and eastern parts of england and scotland but elsewhere we have light winds and a bit more sunshine so an improvement. The nest batch of Rain Waiting In The Wings e head in gfiflff of rain; buflgthgrseey ww further spells of wet weather see further spells of wet weather working west to east across the country, another breezy day and that makes way for a fairly unsettled week ahead. Bye for now. Hello. This is bbc news with clive myrie. Well be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment first the headlines. Police have named two of the three men responsible for the London Bridge attack. They re khuram butt and rachid redouane. He was known to the Security Services but police say there was no evidence he was planning an attack. A vigil has been held in Central London to commemorate the seven people who died, and 48 others injured in saturdays London Bridge attack. 18 people remain in a critical condition. The first victim to be named is 30 year old Christine Archibald from canada. The sister of James Mcmullan says she believes her brother is also among the dead. Hello and welcome to the papers. With me are laura perrins, co editor of the website the i leads its coverage with the conciliatory words by a relative of one of the victims, in saturdays attack at London Bridge. The metro calls a Romanian Baker A true brit, after he squared up and confronted the attackers. The sun asks why the authorities didnt stop the attacker khuram butt, after he appeared on a Tv Documentary about british jihadists. The guardian reports on the metropolitan polices plans to reform the National Counter terrorism strategy. The Daily Telegraph leads with khuram butts openness about his extremist views, before carrying out the attack at London Bridge. The daily mirror asks how did butt slip through the security net, despite being known to the authorities. And the mail says mi5 and Scotland Yard investigated khuram butt two years ago, then let him go. Lots of questions indeed concerning khuram butt. Seemed to be on the radar of the authorities. Brazen jihad is that it was to parade jihad is that it was free to parade his extremism jihad is that it was free to parade his extremism he appeared his extremism on tv. He appeared ina his extremism on tv. He appeared in a channel his extremism on tv. He appeared Ina Channellr his extremism on tv. He appeared in a channel a documentary on extremism. Overall, a bad night for the Security Services, mi5 and scotla nd the Security Services, mi5 and Scotland Yard. It is actually beyond parody in that khuram butt, first of all, a pakistani born and then came to britain with his parents, britain granted them refugee status, just like the parents of the killer from the manchester attack. Khuram butt in the background of the channel 4 documentary called the jihadis in the background of the channel 4 documentary called thejihadis next door. He was free to carry out the attack. Even worse but the Security Services, he did fall under investigation but was deemed not to bea investigation but was deemed not to be a threat of the investigation was pulled back. Also, within the story in the telegraph, the third individual who was not named, was also named to the Security Services. The question now will be, is there a gap in the legislation, do the Security Services need more power to ta ke Security Services need more power to take somebody like khuram butt on, if he isnt explicitly planning an attack but looks like a real risk to safety of the public . What else can be done in terms of legislation . It may be that there is nothing that can be done but there is a question that needs to be looked at. The bottom line is, mi5, the security agencies, they have a lot of people to look out. To look at. 3000, it may be. That still leaves a lot of other people who need to be looked at as well. They took the decision that this man was not the kind of serious threat that needed 24 hour surveillance. Because the killers have been named, ortwo surveillance. Because the killers have been named, or two of the three of them have been named, across all the papers today. No surprise he wasnt a clean skin, he was on the radar, off the radar, back on the radar. He was on the channel 4 documentary the jihadis next door. He wasnt considered a risk. Britains most senior antiterrorism officer, defending his decision, saying there was nothing that would suggest that a decision had been made. They knew about this guy but prioritised him into the lower echelons of their investigators work. Every day, they have to make these calls on who to follow, who to monitor, who to directly approach, echoes of because the bad guys know that a good guys are looking at them. They cant get at them all. The focus now does turn on why was he missed, why do you keep missing him. You cant legislate people thinking about people planning an act of terrorism. In part of the documentary, we are going to the daily mirror. How the hell did he slipped through . The London Bridge terrorist. In a few words, say what everybody is thinking. How the hell did he get through. He is literally on Tv Advertising the fact that he isajihadi. He on Tv Advertising the fact that he is a jihadi. He is unfurling an ice is a jihadi. He is unfurling an ice is flat. It seems astonishing that he would stay either below the radar for this long. Isis flag. This is not somebody who is just outside the main. Ok, he is unfurling a isis flag. I was told by a Counterterrorism Experts that it ta kes Counterterrorism Experts that it takes 20 people 2a hours a day to watch somebody. What are you going to do . I think unfurling a isis flag could amount to infighting hatred. You can be pulled up for a tweet these days. The met will now put people under investigation. Yet you can go on national tv, it seems, and u nfu rl can go on national tv, it seems, and unfurl the isis flag and you wont even be pulled in for questioning. He was obviously pulled in questioning and was spoken to bite if the guy unfurls our flag in the hope that he will be arrested. Im not sure if it is a proper isis flag. The headline says unfurling a isis fla on channel 4 from the jihadis next door. I dont think there is any question in relation to there is any question in relation to the fact this he must have said something that could have amounted to, an offence. It would be a low level a fence, no doubt about that. Which means he probably wouldnt have been held for that long offence. The times goes into this in depth as to whether or not there was a greater network. This is the issue. Initially it may seem minor, you know, he is not that serious. If you probe deeply enough it may be that there is a more serious network behind him. But it is speculative. Yes, it is speculative and takes time and resources. Meanwhile you have 3000 people who are serious about potentially doing something. This brings up, again, talk of control orders. How do you monitor someone control orders. How do you monitor someone when control orders. How do you monitor someone when you control orders. How do you monitor someone when you do not have evidence, to put them on a court of law . It is two things. Guys out there on and off the radar, you cannot monitor them all at the same time and, b, it shows us the scale of the problem and the changes since march 22 when we thought that Guy On Westminster and we saw someone gunned down, the mistake then was to think that that was it, that that was the big attack that london had been waiting for. It was not. It was the first act in this three act tragedy, coming up to the general election on thursday. Letsjust bring up the daily mail. We had him and let him go. If there was a change and it was anticipated, this change and it was anticipated, this change in activity, five foiled activities and three successful, why are we having an election in the middle of all of this . the campaign was suspended for a day yesterday. But the decision to stage an election must of been taken against the background of this increased activity because it must have been oii activity because it must have been on the radar. I heard and imams speak today talking about the fact that you always get a spike in attacks during ramadan. Ramanathan is the holy month. It is a particularly special month for anyone who apparently wants to perform jihad. There was a call from isis to do that. That is another interesting question. Britain faces different level of Terror Threat police warn. This brings us, starting to bring us onto the political dimension of all of this. Of course, this plays into the election campaign. And, whether or not, the police, that there are enough of them, festival and whether conservative cuts have contributed toa conservative cuts have contributed to a situation, a different situation on the ground. And, also, whether or not police and Security Services and need more powers. The Duelling Battle between those two ideas. It is beginning to sink in now that this is a real and significant, serious threat in britain and Scotland Yards Assista Nt Britain and Scotland Yards Assistant Commissioner is saying the changes may be necessary to cover one, the police, too, mi5 and three, and communities, technology companies, the law, and other areas. Companies, the law, and other areas. 0n the other one hand i have great sympathy but on the other i think we should always examine closely when somebody asks for, when is police and security ask for yet more power. What i would want to know is what is the gap . What prevented them from pursuing khuram butt. He was known. Stop them . What was in the Decision Making process that said we would downgrade him. Is it having lots of extra powers or more Police Officers on the street, would that have changed that decision . Perhaps. Icertainly would that have changed that decision . Perhaps. I certainly think there should be more police on, you know, on the beat. Not behind their desks. Labour tried to make a lot about these 20,000 cuts. It may be releva nt about these 20,000 cuts. It may be relevant but if those Police Officers simply put behind a desk as opposed to within the community they serve, i doubt it would make much of a difference. You have encapsulated what the debate has been all day today between conservative and labour and what it would be if the next 50 odd hours until the polls open on thursday morning. We have tuesday and wednesday left and security and who keeps us save, what the gaps are and where they are, whether there are enough leaves and whether there are enough leaves and whether they should be harmed, these are the questions that will play out over the next two days in the election campaign. The front page of the times, another attacker linked to the 77 bombing attack. 0ne the times, another attacker linked to the 77 bombing attack. One of the gaps could be simply being on the end of a phone on the Anti Terrorist hotline and taking the call and noting down the details. Apparently two calls were made about this man over the last few years by members of his own community. This story is quite complex and in terms it is saying that there could be a much wider link and he was linked to a greater terrorist network. In particular he was a contact of the eldest of the four Suicide Bombers on 77. Bling seems to be through a gym in east london where khuram butt actually work. It is at issue, if you downgrade an investigation, what you downgrade an investigation, what you miss behind the scenes . It may be that there are only a few steps to go before you up a wider network. Again, it is easier to speculate than actually be there but this is a lwa ys than actually be there but this is always the problem between resources and whether you have 20,000 suspects, how far can East Investigation Go . It is a real problem now and it may be that resources will have to change. The times does a good treatment of what we know about the suspect all, the killers, and joining these dots through an east london gym, a trainer there who was linked to hate preacher who supplied the 77 killers. So directly between khuram butt and one of the four 7 7 bombers. They have balance that with pictures of one of the missing victims and that two killers themselves. We touched on the political dimension of all that. |j would political dimension of all that. would like to say that the times have done our story onJames Mcmullan. This is a man who apparently, i think, mcmullan. This is a man who apparently, ithink, a body has mcmullan. This is a man who apparently, i think, a body has been found and his credit card has been found. But as yet there has not been a formal identification. Yes. It is his sister who gave a statement, melissa mcgowan. Mcmullan. It is horrific to the family but they are sure that their brother has died. The front page of the Daily Express talking about theresa may asking to be trusted to keep them all say. We know where the Daily Express is coming from. She had trouble today is selling an outline, however. I we nt is selling an outline, however. I went at a press conference. 21 questions, no answers. You know . She was challenged six times directly on whether she regretted or whether she should have got Police Numbers and each time she dodged and avoided comment she went to a 2015 timeline when the conservative government said they would increase numbers. But there were a good five years before then where Police Numbers we re before then where Police Numbers were down. She is not Out Of The Woods on this, far from it. At the same time, on the front page of the guardian, Me Unpatriotic . Complete nonsense says Jeremy Corbyn. Guardian, Me Unpatriotic . Complete nonsense saysJeremy Corbyn. Attacks on him because of comments that he made about anti Terror Legislation in the past. It is bad news to Jeremy Corbyn if he has to actually have an interview to confirm that he is patriotic. And does not want. You would expect labour in the last 72 hours of the campaign for the conservatives to focus on Jeremy Corbyn and his perceived lack of. There should not be a question marked that the proposed leader of the uk should be unpatriotic but here we are debating map. In fairness to jeremy here we are debating map. In fairness toJeremy Corbyn, many people did oppose certain aspects of the previous Terror Legislation. But what concerns me, leaving Jeremy Corbyn aside, in particular, Isjohn Mcdonald who i think we has previously signed a Letter Calling for mi5 previously signed a Letter Calling formi5 and previously signed a Letter Calling for mi5 and armed police to be disbanded. There is one thing not have enough resources, another thing to completely disband mi5 and someone to completely disband mi5 and someone said that a victory in the British State as a victory for assault. Those kind. We will have to ended there, i am sorry. I know you could go on for much longer. Thank you. Dont forget you can see all the front pages of the papers online on the bbc news website. You can also watch it later on the bbc i play. Thank you again to both of you for joining play. Thank you again to both of you forjoining us. Ina in a couple of moments we will bring you the question time leaders of special with tim farron and Nicola Sturgeon taking times to answer questions from voters in edinburgh. Two of the attackers on London Bridge have been named, khuram butt and rachid redouane. They both lived in barking. The sister ofJames Mcmullan says she believes her brother is among the dead and Christine Archibald has been the first named victim of the London Bridge attack. 36 people remain in hospital and 18 are in a critical condition. As the investigation continues, a number of people have been detained after police raids in east london. And theresa may has been accused ofjeopardising National Security by cutting Police Numbers but she has hit back saying Jeremy Corbyn is soft on terror. It is d day minus three. 0n thursday, we must all decide. Tonight, the leader of the Liberal Democrats and the leader of the Scottish National party, they are here to face the voters. This is question time. David, iam david, i am afraid he cannot be here tonight he is busy preparing for the big night. 0ver tonight he is busy preparing for the big night. Over the next hour our audience here in edinburgh will put their questions to two party leaders. Neither are pretending they will be your next Prime Minister but they could play a vital role in shaping the future of this country, indeed, its very existence. You can join in from home on twitter, on facebook or via text. The hash tag is bbc qt and the text number is on screen. As ever, is bbc qt and the text number is on screen. As ever, our is bbc qt and the text number is on screen. As ever, our guests have not seen screen. As ever, our guests have not seen the questions they are about to face and they draw lots to decide who is to begin. First, please welcome the leader of the Liberal Democrats, tim farron. Good evening. Good evening and thank you for joining us. Lets get ourfirst question tonight from the audience. We are under attack if properly controlled, why is Internet Surveillance is not a good thing . Controlled, why is Internet Surveillance is not a good thing7m can save lives. First of all, you, like everybody else would have been here last night the, of course we rightly postponed to pay tribute to those who died and remember those who passed away and to stand in solidarity with loved ones and all those injured and affected by the london attacks. You think about what you are going to say before you come ona you are going to say before you come on a programme like this, after an event as happened on Saturday Night and you remember yourself saying really similar things a fortnight earlier after the appalling outrage in manchester. To my mind, our reactions, maybe they are similar to mine are heartbreak, the impact on individuals and their families and, friendly, anger. Anger that this should happen to people in our community and that it should happen at all. Such utter wickedness. Therefore, the desire for something to be done is utterly right. So here we go. Do we believe that the reason we go. Do we believe that the reason we have not been able to prevent outrages such as those on Saturday Night and two weeks ago in manchester was because of a lack of surveillance . 0r Manchester was because of a lack of surveillance . Or was it because of a lack of resources . It seems to me, for example, that we have had a moment the ability, the powers, police have powers to follow and track criminals, to be able to pursue terrorists, to be able to hack into their devices. What we do not have is sufficient pairs of eyes and hands in our Security Services and hands in our Security Services and in our police force, to be able to pursue and catch them. I would like to know what could be done to prevent free cowards in a van from deciding to do what they did on Saturday Night. I know that safer if we invest in police and Security Services. An additional numberof Security Services. An additional number of Police Across the country would make us safer. The cuts that theresa may made as Home Secretary have not made us safer. Applause are you convinced by that . I feel we are restricted and the police are restricted

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.