with autocrats and that the us will stand behind them.— stand behind them. there is an active choice _ stand behind them. there is an active choice of— stand behind them. there is an active choice of making - stand behind them. there is an active choice of making a - stand behind them. there is an i active choice of making a decision so i wonder if you could help us understand why the biden administration is not speaking strongly enough, then why they are not? these things don't happen by chance. , ., �* , , ., chance. they don't but they have chosen diplomatic _ chance. they don't but they have chosen diplomatic expediency. . chance. they don't but they have i chosen diplomatic expediency. they want indie _ chosen diplomatic expediency. they waht indie on— chosen diplomatic expediency. they want india on board _ chosen diplomatic expediency. they want india on board when _ chosen diplomatic expediency. they want india on board when it- chosen diplomatic expediency. they want india on board when it comes. chosen diplomatic expediency. they. want india on board when it comes to their indo—pacific_ want india on board when it comes to their indo—pacific strategy, _ want india on board when it comes to their indo—pacific strategy, their- their indo—pacific strategy, their strong _ their indo—pacific strategy, their strong tine — their indo—pacific strategy, their strong tine on— their indo—pacific strategy, their strong line on china _ their indo—pacific strategy, their strong line on china in _ their indo—pacific strategy, their strong line on china in honestlyi strong line on china in honestly also _ strong line on china in honestly also on — strong line on china in honestly also on russia _ strong line on china in honestly also on russia when _ strong line on china in honestly also on russia when it - strong line on china in honestly also on russia when it comes. strong line on china in honestly| also on russia when it comes to the warm _ also on russia when it comes to the warm in— also on russia when it comes to the warm in ukraine _ also on russia when it comes to the warm in ukraine. they— also on russia when it comes to the warm in ukraine. they also - also on russia when it comes to the warm in ukraine. they also in - warm in ukraine. they also in the case _ warm in ukraine. they also in the case of— warm in ukraine. they also in the case of saudi _ warm in ukraine. they also in the case of saudi arabia _ warm in ukraine. they also in the case of saudi arabia pursued - warm in ukraine. they also in the . case of saudi arabia pursued energy and economic— case of saudi arabia pursued energy and economic interests _ case of saudi arabia pursued energy and economic interests over- case of saudi arabia pursued energy and economic interests over at - case of saudi arabia pursued energy| and economic interests over at some of those _ and economic interests over at some of those human— and economic interests over at some of those human rights _ and economic interests over at some of those human rights properties, i of those human rights properties, and i_ of those human rights properties, and i did — of those human rights properties, and i did believe _ of those human rights properties, and i did believe when— of those human rights properties, and i did believe whenjoe - of those human rights properties, and i did believe whenjoe biden i and i did believe whenjoe biden canre _ and i did believe whenjoe biden canre in— and i did believe whenjoe biden canre in the _ and i did believe whenjoe biden came in the office _ and i did believe whenjoe biden came in the office and _ and i did believe whenjoe biden came in the office and secretary| came in the office and secretary zaghari—ratcliffe _ came in the office and secretary zaghari—ratcliffe who _ came in the office and secretary zaghari—ratcliffe who i - came in the office and secretary zaghari—ratcliffe who i work - came in the office and secretary- zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in _ zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the — zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the white _ zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the white house _ zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the white house said - zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the white house said we - zaghari—ratcliffe who i work closely with in the white house said we are putting human _ with in the white house said we are putting human rights _ with in the white house said we are putting human rights at _ with in the white house said we are putting human rights at the - with in the white house said we are putting human rights at the centre. putting human rights at the centre of our— putting human rights at the centre of our policy — putting human rights at the centre of our policy but _ putting human rights at the centre of our policy but unfortunately - putting human rights at the centre of our policy but unfortunately is l of our policy but unfortunately is in the _ of our policy but unfortunately is in the track— of our policy but unfortunately is in the back burner— of our policy but unfortunately is in the back burner and _ of our policy but unfortunately is in the back burner and what - of our policy but unfortunately is l in the back burner and what you're seeing _ in the back burner and what you're seeing from the _ in the back burner and what you're seeing from the events _ in the back burner and what you're seeing from the events in- in the back burner and what you're seeing from the events in last - in the back burner and what you're i seeing from the events in last week four hours— seeing from the events in last week four hours in— seeing from the events in last week four hours in russia _ seeing from the events in last week four hours in russia and _ seeing from the events in last week four hours in russia and elsewherel four hours in russia and elsewhere in world _ four hours in russia and elsewhere in world is— four hours in russia and elsewhere in world is it — four hours in russia and elsewhere in world is it dictators, _ four hours in russia and elsewhere in world is it dictators, autocrats, i in world is it dictators, autocrats, those _ in world is it dictators, autocrats, those with — in world is it dictators, autocrats, those with less _ in world is it dictators, autocrats, those with less than _ in world is it dictators, autocrats, those with less than stellar - those with less than stellar democratic— those with less than stellar democratic credentials, - those with less than stellar i democratic credentials, have