i would expect the prime minister to make a statement, and we will consider it. make a statement, and we will consider it— consider it. some of your colleagues, _ consider it. some of your colleagues, though, i consider it. some of your colleagues, though, and| consider it. some of your i colleagues, though, and other opposition parties, have said that parliament could have and should have been consulted as a matter of principle, and someone you know rather well used to also believe parliament should always be consulted as a matter of principle. ijust consulted as a matter of principle. i just want to show you something. i would pass legislation that said military action could be taken if — first — the lawful case for it was made — secondly, there was a viable objective — and thirdly, you got the consent of the commons. now, it was one of your own solemn promises to your party members that you would make it mandatory under a prevention of military intervention act that there would be the consent of parliament. have you changed your mind? ., �* , ., of parliament. have you changed your mind? ., �*, ., ,, _ mind? no, there's no inconsistency here. mind? no, there's no inconsistency here- really? _ mind? no, there's no inconsistency here. really? there's _ mind? no, there's no inconsistency here. really? there's obviously i mind? no, there's no inconsistency here. really? there's obviously a i here. really? there's obviously a hue here. really? there's obviously a huge distinction _ here. really? there's obviously a huge distinction between i here. really? there's obviously a huge distinction between an i huge distinction between an operation the like of which we have