been fired on the ground, how does shotspotter know with such confidence that 97% accurate? on our right along, i saw for myself. shotspotter says this figure is accurate because the police officers themselves are able to listen to the noise recording and feed this back to them, something they called —— ground truth. but is part of the feedback you are basing that on? :, , ., that on? that is, we are relying _ that on? that is, we are relying on _ that on? that is, we are relying on ground i that on? that is, we are relying on ground truth | that on? that is, we are i relying on ground truth from agencies to tell us when we miss, when we missed detections or classifying. miss, when we missed detections or classifying-— or classifying. other people have said — or classifying. other people have said about _ or classifying. other people have said about the - or classifying. other people have said about the general state of 97% that it is not rooted in scientific rigour, i.e., it has not been scrutinised, peer reviewed. do you think that is fair? it is certainly _ you think that is fair? it is certainly a _ you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor - you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor that i you think that is fair? it is certainly a factor that has| you think that is fair? it 3 certainly a factor that has not been an academic peer review of the service but i would push backin the service but i would push back in saying it is not been analysed. it has been analysed