why would you think they'd be capable of doing that? well, i wouldn't leave it to them. and that's why what we recommended with our joint committee report was that the online safety regime should be based on existing offences in uk law, where the job of the regulator is explaining to the big tech companies through established codes of practice what their requirements are, that they are liable for harmful content on their platforms and if they don't act...set out in the codes of practice, the minimum standards set out in the codes of practice, then they themselves could be fined. the companies exist at the moment in a world where they would say, "well, we don't write "the extremist content," that you've got to go after the person who's doing it. "we're just merely hosting it." but they play a central role in recommending and promoting that content. so what we want to do is...