we're talking about limiting the reach of that information, not having it take of our society the way it has. d0 having it take of our society the way it has-— way it has. do you really think ou'll be way it has. do you really think you'll be able _ way it has. do you really think you'll be able to _ way it has. do you really think you'll be able to do _ way it has. do you really think you'll be able to do that? - way it has. do you really think. you'll be able to do that? well, way it has. do you really think i you'll be able to do that? well, i ho -e so. you'll be able to do that? well, i hepe s0- one — you'll be able to do that? well, i hope so. one thing _ you'll be able to do that? well, i hope so. one thing we've - you'll be able to do that? well, i hope so. one thing we've tried l you'll be able to do that? well, i | hope so. one thing we've tried to you'll be able to do that? well, i - hope so. one thing we've tried to do is to balance those interests, as i was saying, and do it in a responsible way. i think it's enormously important that congress take up the issue and not avoid it because it's complicated or because there's more than one way to skin this cat. we've done this in a very bipartisan way, taking in hundreds of bits of information and advice and insights from experts and tech leaders and regular americans and theirfamilies. what leaders and regular americans and their families. what we're trying to do is come up with set of solutions that gives a road map, a blueprint for regulatory framework at our national level and i hope that what