our historian has never been down himself, but now it's been scanned, it can. been scanned, he can. what do you make of it? yeah, so my first impression is across the two different types of construction in here. ifind it quite interesting, up above we have this red brick, large parts of warwick were completely gutted by fire in 1694—95, and so this would certainly correlate to this being built maybe when the houses up above were demolished and rebuilt after the fire. of course what really interests me is down below, this sandstone tunnel, because this looks like it has been really carved quite aggressively and quite vigorously into the rock. if this is just a waste tunnel, why is it so big? you know what, it's a very good question. my instinct before coming down here was that it was carved quite large because of course people would be coming down here, so they are not going to crawl around carving, they will need space to really kind of chip in. it is far larger than i expected, and i think that does question whether this was solely and indeed