it's trying to do so again. azov�*s presence once it sent —— makes it central to russia's false narrative. afterwards, the russians said this. translation: at the un security council, fats were _ at the un security council, fats were proffered by the delegation saying _ were proffered by the delegation saying that the maternity hospital had been — saying that the maternity hospital had been taken over by azov and other— had been taken over by azov and other radicals. but had been taken over by azov and other radicals.— other radicals. but there's no evidence _ other radicals. but there's no evidence they _ other radicals. but there's no evidence they were _ other radicals. but there's no evidence they were based - other radicals. but there's no i evidence they were based there. other radicals. but there's no - evidence they were based there. then there's russia's attack on a theatre in mariupol. russia accuses azov of doing it and there's no evidence this is true. while any azov volunteers having nazi sympathies is shocking and worthy of note, neo—nazis are not the threat that russia describes. perhaps this is not about an actual threat. but rather about something else entirely. the new york times