stream 2? and _ rethink its position on a nord stream 2? and the _ rethink its position on a nord stream 2? and the third - rethink its position on a nord - stream 2? and the third question, if i may, _ stream 2? and the third question, if i may, over— stream 2? and the third question, if i may. overthe _ stream 2? and the third question, if i may, over the last— stream 2? and the third question, if i may, over the last few— stream 2? and the third question, if i may, over the last few days - i may, over the last few days and weeks. _ i may, over the last few days and weeks. there _ i may, over the last few days and weeks, there has— i may, over the last few days and weeks, there has been— i may, over the last few days and weeks, there has been severe i weeks, there has been severe criticism — weeks, there has been severe criticism from _ weeks, there has been severe criticism from the _ weeks, there has been severe criticism from the us - weeks, there has been severe criticism from the us media . weeks, there has been severe l criticism from the us media and weeks, there has been severe - criticism from the us media and from congress. _ criticism from the us media and from congress. as— criticism from the us media and from congress, as well, _ criticism from the us media and from congress, as well, vis—a—vis - criticism from the us media and from i congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany atrout— congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany about the _ congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany about the reliability— congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany about the reliability of— congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany about the reliability of germany- congress, as well, vis—a—vis germany about the reliability of germany as i about the reliability of germany as an ally _ about the reliability of germany as an ally this — about the reliability of germany as an ally. this has _ about the reliability of germany as an ally. this has been _ about the reliability of germany as an ally. this has been called - about the reliability of germany as an ally. this has been called into. an ally. this has been called into question — an ally. this has been called into question do— an ally. this has been called into question. do you _ an ally. this has been called into question. do you understand - an ally. this has been called into| question. do you understand this criticism? — question. do you understand this criticism? is— question. do you understand this criticism? is germany— question. do you understand this criticism? is germany a - question. do you understand this criticism? is germany a reliable i criticism? is germany a reliable partner— criticism? is germany a reliable partner from _ criticism? is germany a reliable partner from your— criticism? is germany a reliable partner from your point - criticism? is germany a reliable partner from your point of - criticism? is germany a reliablel partner from your point of view? and, _ partner from your point of view? and. mr— partner from your point of view? and, mr chancellor, _ partner from your point of view? and, mr chancellor, a _ partner from your point of view? and, mr chancellor, a question. partner from your point of view? i and, mr chancellor, a question to you _ and, mr chancellor, a question to you nord — and, mr chancellor, a question to you. nord stream _ and, mr chancellor, a question to you. nord stream 2, _ and, mr chancellor, a question to you. nord stream 2, you - and, mr chancellor, a question to you. nord stream 2, you said - and, mr chancellor, a question to you. nord stream 2, you said all. you. nord stream 2, you said all options — you. nord stream 2, you said all options are _ you. nord stream 2, you said all options are on— you. nord stream 2, you said all options are on the _ you. nord stream 2, you said all options are on the table. - you. nord stream 2, you said all options are on the table. you i you. nord stream 2, you said all| options are on the table. you are not mentioning _ options are on the table. you are not mentioning nord stream - options are on the table. you are not mentioning nord stream 2. options are on the table. you arei not mentioning nord stream 2 by name _ not mentioning nord stream 2 by name dont— not mentioning nord stream 2 by name don't you _ not mentioning nord stream 2 by name. don't you think— not mentioning nord stream 2 by name. don't you think if- not mentioning nord stream 2 by name. don't you think if you - not mentioning nord stream 2 by| name. don't you think if you were not mentioning nord stream 2 by. name. don't you think if you were to spelt— name. don't you think if you were to spett this _ name. don't you think if you were to spell this out, — name. don't you think if you were to spell this out. you _ name. don't you think if you were to spell this out, you could _ name. don't you think if you were to spell this out, you could win- spell this out, you could win back trust? _ spell this out, you could win back trust? is— spell this out, you could win back trust? is a — spell this out, you could win back trust? is a strong _ spell this out, you could win back trust? is a strong ally _ spell this out, you could win back trust? is a strong ally here, - spell this out, you could win back trust? is a strong ally here, for. trust? is a strong ally here, for the us? — trust? is a strong ally here, for the us? , ., ., . ~ the us? there is no need to win back trust, he the us? there is no need to win back trust. he has — the us? there is no need to win back trust, he has the _ the us? there is no need to win back trust, he has the complete _ the us? there is no need to win back trust, he has the complete trust - the us? there is no need to win back trust, he has the complete trust of l trust, he has the complete trust of the us. germany is one of our most important allies in the world. there is no doubt about germany's partnership with the us, none. with