was not correct, because he had travelled between serbia and spain in that window. he also is raising more questions with his story about having a positive test on 16 december, which is a couple of days before, he was at other events in public including one large event with a bunch of kids, all not wearing masks, and that would have been the day after djokovic received a positive pcr test on his timeline. certainly a lot of questions for him to answer once he finally faces the media here in melbourne. finally faces the media here in melbourne-— finally faces the media here in melbourne. , , . , , melbourne. this is anything but straightforward _ melbourne. this is anything but straightforward first _ melbourne. this is anything but straightforward first something | straightforward first something that should be straightforward. so where does that leave us, do you think, and what sort of chanceis you think, and what sort of chance is there that djokovic's dream of being there for the open might still be thwarted? in tennis terms, the ball is very much in the court of alex hawke who is the australian minister for immigration, hawke who is the australian ministerfor immigration, and minister for immigration, and he ministerfor immigration, and he has the authority to review and revoke djokovic's these are, pretty much unilaterally.