but i would prefer that there is a plan rather than just a but i would prefer that there is a plan rather thanjust a promise —— that moves this forward. the terms of what i going to happen is still very fake but after four years and many broken promises this is an important and welcome move —— the terms of what is going to happen is still very vague. let's talk to the labour mp matt pennycook, the shadow minster for housing and planning. a cautious welcome from sir keir starmer but saying they are rather vague, what detail would you like to see? it vague, what detail would you like to see? , ., vague, what detail would you like to see? h, ., , see? it is a cautious welcome because while _ see? it is a cautious welcome because while it _ see? it is a cautious welcome because while it is _ see? it is a cautious welcome because while it is an - see? it is a cautious welcome l because while it is an important step, we agree with the decision to remove the threat of force to loans for leaseholders in smaller buildings, we have been calling for that for a number of time and we may get further details but we are looking for clarity in three main areas. how is the 4 billion going to be raised from developers? i doubt having not paid this money that they are going to get around a table with michael gove and commit to £4