government's prosecution ofjulian assange is based largely, maybe principally on those kinds of activities. principally on those kinds of activities-— principally on those kinds of activities. ., ,, ., , , activities. now the us has the first amendment because, _ activities. now the us has the first amendment because, indeed, - activities. now the us has the first amendment because, indeed, it . activities. now the us has the first i amendment because, indeed, it has activities. now the us has the first. amendment because, indeed, it has a constitution fall stock. the british don't, it does not have anything that constitutionally overrides what the law says, the statute law says by parliament, beyond some certain common—law principles like the right to trial byjury, the right to be freed if you were locked up forever and ever without ever facing justice. given we don't have the things you are referring to, it's things you are referring to, its reasonable is in it for the high court to accept assurances from the us that if he is extradited, he will be given a fair trial within the context of what the law is in the united states?— context of what the law is in the united states? ., ~ ., �* ., ., united states? you know, i'm not an exert on united states? you know, i'm not an expert on uk — united states? you know, i'm not an expert on uk law. — united states? you know, i'm not an expert on uk law, i can't _ united states? you know, i'm not an expert on uk law, i can't say - united states? you know, i'm not an expert on uk law, i can't say what's. expert on uk law, i can't say what's reasonable or not in that context.