economist is oxford . efficiency. the chief us - economist is oxford economics economist is 0xford economics and says he thinks the agreement is a step in the right direction. i agreement is a step in the right direction.— right direction. i think this is indeed _ right direction. i think this is indeed something - right direction. i think this is indeed something that l right direction. i think this | is indeed something that is quite — is indeed something that is quite a _ is indeed something that is quite a feat in terms of multilateralism. what we've managed to achieve is a global court _ managed to achieve is a global court whereby the level playing field and jurisdiction will be met— field and jurisdiction will be met and _ field and jurisdiction will be met and by companies will no longer— met and by companies will no longer have this ability to choose _ longer have this ability to choose the jurisdiction in which _ choose the jurisdiction in which they decide to be taxed. this should help in terms of global— this should help in terms of global coordination and help reduce — global coordination and help reduce potential tensions between different countries when — between different countries when it _ between different countries when it comes to corporate taxation _ when it comes to corporate taxation and avoid a race to the — taxation and avoid a race to the bottom in terms of corporate tax rates. critics have said _ corporate tax rates. critics have said the _ corporate tax rates. critics have said the deal - corporate tax rates. critics have said the deal is - corporate tax rates. critics have said the deal is a - corporate tax rates. critics i have said the deal is a white and doesn't go far enough in reality, a big multinational mogul like google will find a way to pay less than 15% and they have described is a mockery of fairness. what do you say to that?—