gilbert. those groups -- with professor gilbert. ., ., ., , ., gilbert. for a full house, do you think there's _ gilbert. for a full house, do you think there's enough _ gilbert. for a full house, do you think there's enough evidence i gilbert. for a full house, do you i think there's enough evidence that the first round of vaccines is doing its job, the first round of vaccines is doing itsjob, is holding the line? yes. its job, is holding the line? yes, and i its job, is holding the line? yes, and i think— its job, is holding the line? yes, and i think part _ its job, is holding the line? yes, and i think part of _ its job, is holding the line? yes, and i think part of the _ itsjob, is holding the line? 1a: and i think part of the problem is that people get confused between protection against infection, which is a sort of decreasing, but protection against severe disease, and the evidence is that protection against severe disease is pretty robust, doesn't seem to be declining, and protection against severe disease from the delta variant is just as effective as it was for the previous variant. so i think in terms of what you really want vaccine to do, to severe disease, remove the pressure on the health service, i think it's tilting a remarkably good job. bud health service, i think it's tilting a remarkably good job.- a remarkably good 'ob. and it is their a remarkably good 'ob. and it is warmth a remarkably good 'ob. and it is their merit, then, i a remarkably good job. and it is their merit, then, in _ a remarkably good job. and it is their merit, then, in seeing i a remarkably good job. and it is their merit, then, in seeing justj their merit, then, in seeing just how far we can go with those original vaccinations, to see how far they can do thatjob of preventing serious illness and hospitalisation?—