think that�*s the ethical issue here. how much can you weigh other, non—health criteria against this decision? and that is, i suspect, thatis decision? and that is, i suspect, that is not going to be easily resolved amongst different opinions around this. fit resolved amongst different opinions around this. u, , g around this. of course, the jcvi looked specifically _ around this. of course, the jcvi looked specifically at _ around this. of course, the jcvi looked specifically at the - around this. of course, the jcvi l looked specifically at the benefits for the children themselves, rather than the wider impact on society, which we were conned onto in a moment. but —— we will come onto in moment. do you think enough consideration was given to the presence of long covid in children? i given to the presence of long covid in children?— in children? i haven't seen the deliberations _ in children? i haven't seen the deliberations of— in children? i haven't seen the deliberations of the _ in children? i haven't seen the l deliberations of the committee. in children? i haven't seen the i deliberations of the committee. i in children? i haven't seen the - deliberations of the committee. i am sure the committee members would have been aware of recent evidence on a long covid and the uncertainties around that evidence, and so yes, i�*m pretty sure they would have taken that into some form of consideration. but, you know, i haven�*t seen the minutes of the meeting so i don�*t know for certain.