to it, and forget everything around it. but isn't it part of the mix of a green agenda? first of all, i think when we talk about this, it seems like this is one silver bullet that will solve everything. first of all, our energy—related emissions aren't all of our emissions. second of all, if we were to build to replace our current fossil fuel—generated energy with nuclear power, we don't have the time to do that, because our c02 budget runs out in less than a decade at current emissions. carbon budgets limit the amount of greenhouse gases a particular country can produce between now and 2050, which is the paris agreement�*s deadline for net zero. the point at which no new greenhouse gases should be added to the atmosphere. this government, i can hear them now, you know, in interviews i do, of them, saying, you know, we've got an ambitious plan for net zero by 2050. there is a range of different stuff that we've got to do to hit that plan. nuclear is part of it. and on that part of it,