Im antonio mora. Here is more on what is ahead. Senate shot down a bill that would have changed the way sexualities are prosecuted. A shocking ruling date day. In favour of a man that took upskirt photos. A new report finds american hospitals and doctors have been overprescribing antibiotics. They are often used as shotgun treatments. New voe cab words and a scaled back map section. What you do on s. A. T. Is not what you do in high school. Can you take pictures up a womans skirt. According to mass , you can, and you can text people pictures of your genitals, why . Because the law doesnt prohibility it. Friday, governor patrick signed a new law making it illegal. As technology develops, what can we do to keep it outpacing the law. Al jazeera jamie floyd is here in new york. This case in massachusetts is stunning. They basically ruled a guy who was taking pictures up womens skirts could do it, it wasnt illegal. Yes, there were two reasons. The pictures were taken in public, a place you dont have reasonable inspection of privacy, and the women and there are only two documented, but the women were not undoctorsed. They were not naked or partially nude. And the peeping tom law requires you be in a dressing room or a place of privacy. So the specificity of the law, the alert of the law was not violated. Couldnt the judge have looked at the peeping judge law and said hey, the intention of law is. You are asking if they could go with the spirit of the law. This happened in the state of washington, the same issue, upskirting, and the court ruled the same way. Judges are not supposed to make law, but interpret it. Its a cry out for the legislature to make a law that fits modern times and technology. This law is only 10 years old, iphones five years old. Thats how quickly the world is changing. This court made it clear that they didnt like that they had to do this, they dont agree with the state of the law, but had to do what the law required. The Georgia Supreme Court said the same thing and a more extreme case. A guy sent, to put it bluntly, pictures of his tattooed penis to a woman who had no interest in getting it. Unsolicited. They said it was fine. They said it wasnt covered by what the law there covered. Which was hard copy you could not sent pornographing pictures. In the mail. Electronic pornographic imagery was not covered by the law. And, therefore, under the letter of the law, what the man had done was not il. They were saying, get with it legislature, lets make laws covering the new technology. Is this a case where the court had more lee way. If you are saying you cant send it by snailmail, what is the difference sending it by email, you are sending the pornographic material over some form of mail. It is fundamentally different. The means and method is different. That gets to the bigger question how can the law keep up with technology, can it. The Supreme Court gets these cases every year, and we are going to have to start looking forward, instead of looking backward. The law is so reactionary. We wait until there are victims, and then we do something about it. Thats the position that will judges are in, not just high court judges. This case was the Supreme Court of the state of massachusetts, going all the way through the system in that state. State court judges, before you get there, are looking back after a victim complains in court. Its for the legislatures to make law looking ahead. Shouldnt there be a most. Is there nothing out there that is trying to do that, suggest new laws to deal with technologies. I think lets talk to the kids. She said, cell phones under skirts, she said what about google glass. Some guy will be sitting on the sub way looking through my clothes, i wont have to worry about them looking up my skirt. Young people are visionaries about the Way Technologies runs up 200yearold rights. We need to talk with them, our thought leaders of technology about how to make the law fit. Talking about technology, and our constitutional rights, the state Supreme Court of georgia did not rule on this. It was a thing brought up. Whether the guy sending the pictures by text or email. That was within his rights. We have to be clear about this. The first amendment, google glass, technology, its positive. Its great, its good. When used properly. So we are focussed on the victims in massachusetts, the ways in which the courts hands were tide and the ways we want to protect victims in the future. We dont want to focus on the fear factor. We want to work with the legislatures and Technology Leaders to make the technology work, and not allow the wrong doers to have more control over technology than those of us that want to use it in positive ways. Good to have you on the show. Turning to the s. A. T. , its the second Biggest College transexam after the act. There are major revisions, among them going back to a 1600 point system, the essay optional. Critics are not sure it will help judge a students ability to succeed. Hes from fair test, a watchdog group. Why so many challenges now. The leaders of the clem board figured out College Board figured out that the changes failed in the market play. The act, which had been behind, overtook the s. A. T. As the most popular standardized tests and 95 colleges dropped requirements, going test optional. Which is what fair test advocated. Is this a competitive thing, that they want to get people taking the s. A. T. More again. Look at what happened. Its like when the Cocacola Company introduced new coke and it flopped. They had to reformulate. The changes the College Board made is to make it look more like the actment the College Board will make the sa optional. Just as its been the case. Theyll score the test differently so you are not penalized. Theyll eliminate esoteric words. If you want to, well see what the new s. A. T. Will be like. Take the new act right now. Theyll narrow the focus of the maths section of the test. Even the headlines said the changes are making the s. A. T. Harder. It looks like the op sid. It wont make it harder or easier. They equate the scores, curbing the scores so tests are equally hard from year to year. What theyll do is make it more attractive to students and parents around the country to regain market share. A criticism is that the s. A. T. S open the door for all the tutors and prep courses and books that allow or give an unfair advantage to kids that have money. They are trying to counter that by providing online tute earring. Will that tutoring. Will that help balance things . Maybe a little bit. But the that is correct of the matter is theres free video tutoring. Free s. A. T. Test prep and theres hundreds of product. Free or no cost. Every Guidance Office has copies that will get you ready. This is unlikely to affect the high end test prem in which wealthy parents by the kids the equivalence of test steroids by paying students 100 or 500 or paying individual personal trainers 15,000 to 25,000 to give the kids the personalized one on one coaching that is significantly boosting scores, and give the kids who have every advantage, because their parents have money another leg up. It wont be a level playing field. Rich kids will do better on the s. A. T. S, and schools that rely on scores will continue to give an advantage to kids that need it the least. As you said. Some schools moving away from looking at test scores for admission purposes, but without them, doesnt it make it that much harder for College Admissions people to figure out how strong a student a kid is, especially given the big differences in the quality of schools around the country . Not at all. A Detailed Research report came out two weeks ago looking at 123,000 students, plying to 33 optional institutions and found this they are making as good or better decisions without reliance on s. A. T. Scores. They were admitting kids that worked just as much. Test scores are not necessary. They are not as good a predictor as High School Grades are. Everyone says that grades are all over the lot. There are stuff and easy stools. Thats true. Grades are better than prep schools that shows you how poor they are as a predictor. It has been shown that High School Grades are more predictive. What are the biggest problems that you see the changes dont address . They dont address the predict ability of the test. They dont test the biases of the the exam. Theres a relationship between a Family Income and test scores giving advantages to kids from well to do families. They underestimate for females and overestimate for males. For kids whose first lapping wig is not english, and for students applying at a nontraditional aids. Add to that the skews of coaching and some get tremendous advantages compared to their peers and going to clems that require s. A. T. Scores. I know a lot taking the s. A. T. Scores. Consider this will be right back. Turning to Sexual Assault in the military, a bill that will remove military commanders over decisions of Sexual Assault cases in the armed forces was defeated in the senate on thursday. The main sponsors vowed to keep fighting for victims. We know that the deck is stacked against victims of Sexual Assault in the military. Today, sadly, we saw the same in the halls of congress. For two decades every secretary of defense said zero tolerance for the crime. But all we have seen is zero accountability. The pentagons survey found 26,000 incidents of unwanted Sexual Conduct in 2012. And the ongoing problem was driven home with the suspension of the top army prosecutor, accused of groping a colleague at a Sexual Assault legal conference. One of the highest ranking officers on thursday admitted to an affair, pressuring female officers to send nude photos of themselves. A trial will proceed on more serious charges. For more we are joined by an attorney who spearheaded nationwide lawsuits designed to transform the matters in which the military prosecutes rape and Sexual Assault. Thanks for joining us. Senator jilly brand came close to getting what she needed for her bill. As we heard, for two decades every secretary of defence said theres zero tolerance for scult. Is there any doubt that the system is broken. Theres no doubt. The sad reality is we as a nation sat by and let the infers members bear the brunt of this judicial system. Everyone has been on notice that the system is broking. The senator said she was disappointed by the lack of support from the white house. Would that have helped . It would have helped. Obviously the president is the commander in chief. He should have the same impatience and unwillingness to tolerate more rapes or sexuality assaults. We know its time for a change your, there has to be reform. Her main change, the main demonstrate of her bill was to take the prosecution of Sexual Assault cases outside the chain of military command, that if it stayed as it is now, people would not come in and report the cases. Its an important structural reform. The by it is set up you have the people in charge, the commanders serving as judges, in an ajudic atory function, but we know the best justice is blind justice. Thats why, for example, if you sit on a jury, you are excused. The way the military system is structured, is that the commanders, whoever is the boss about the accused they get to decide the legal steps that are taken. They are the ones who are being given this judicial power. The argument, of course, is that the commanders need to command, and taking them out of the command would undermine the whole hierarchy of the military. Senator mcas kills bill doesnt go as far, but events those accused of using the good shoulder defense. They use the military conduct. They will not be able to. And a commanders decision not to move forward would be reviewed by a support and by a legal individual. Is that not enough. At this point, its not just one commander making a decision. If he decides not to move forward, a lawyer has to look at it too. No, sadly its not enough. Everyone has been supportive of senator mcas kills bill. This is a question as to whether the military and the nation and Congress Step up and fix a broken judicial system. The changes are tweaks, but the underlying structure remains flawed. The problem is you have a system with year in and year out failed to incarcerate predators. As a result you see the numbers of rapes continue to rise and climb. Its an epidemic. So you have to fix the judicial system. You have to look at why we are not getting enough reporting and when we are getting reporting, why we are never getting convictions. The glaring for is the commanders are tinkering. Other nations modernized uniformed codes of justice. They realised its an anabbing ronism for the commanders to have the judicial power. They stepped forward into the presence and we need to do the same. We saw this situation this week. We saw it with the head prosecutor sfoor Sexual Assault being accused for Sexual Assault himself. Well, the reality of any system of justice is when you have prosecutorial discretion, some cases will be brought and some will not. What we know is that our american system its emphasis on im impartiality. They know that people making the decisions do not have a personal bias or skin in the game. Here for the service members. We let people hold decisionmaking power that have their career interest, their promote ability interest at stake. Its a straight ford public policy. Theres no way around the fact that its broken. We saw a video of him, one of the highest ranking officers pleading guilty to sexual cases today. Well be back with more of consider this. The use of ivf is exploding in the United States is leading to ethical questions. Is it leading to designer babies, is it a bad thing. This week, a controversial version of ivf that could lead to something that parents are calling 3parent babies. As medical technology advance, where do we join the line on what is acceptable and what is not. Joining us is the captain of University Medical center. Ivf is growing, more than 60,000 of the babies born in 2012 were born that ivf 1. 5 ever babies. Its well own 200,000 worldwide. What used to be an oddity is routine. How much of it is personalities with fertility issues, and how much is parents who are doing this because they want to d Genetic Screening for a disease that they might be transmitting with their genes. Its a great question. If we went back five, seven years wed have 95 of people infertile. Today i bet fertile people saying, i want to avoid disease, i dont want a child with a problem. The reality is doctors can test the embryos for all sorts of issues. We have been able to pull a cell off an embryo, it is replaced, not hurt it. You take the d. N. A. Out of the cell, you run the tests that you reason on you or me. One case that is getting attention is a woman having gss. I wont try to pronounce the disoos. It leads to a painful death. She had invitro and basically looked at the embryos that were in the dish, and they figured out which ones did not have the gss gene, and they discarded those embryos, and she went on to have healthy babies who would not have the disease. Its morally controversial to destroy an embryo, when you pick up the one that is will have a horrible disease or live a shortened life span, it seems to be the ethical thing to do to avoid creating that burden. That type of screening embryos, that use of ivf i support that. We have other things, Breast Cancer genes, increasing the likelihood of severe Breast Cancer. Where do you draw the line . Thats the big question. Id say in . . When you talk about a certainty of disease, you see flawed genes, you have a child with terrible conditions, rarer but dead for the baby, i think there you can screen. We get requests to say, hey, how about boy or girl . , we dont do it at my schools, a lot of others they dont. Some do. In india it has a big business. If its a clear cut Disease State or the rfb of a clear cut disease, you can screen morally. When its a difference, a taste, i start to have reservations. Its not just the sex. There are plenty of things soon to be put on the table. In many states, there is albanism. Not a big deal, you put on your sunglasses. In many parts, they dont want someone without pigment. I think there were two nobel prize winners. Thats one thing Disability Advocates will say. A lot of people with incredible contributions to society nef existed. Let me give you an example. I had a request from a deaf coup, herred tarial deaf, and they wanted deaf. They wanted to create a child that was deaf like them. Theres a separate question, can you use genetic testing if it makes the child worse off or less than it might have been. My answer is no. So many questions being raised, none more than this without news of people in britain, looking into the possibility of parents being 3parent. Remember your high School Textbook where the cells are dividing. It takes power. You need energy. Theres a mitochondria, the battery park, the energy factory. When they are not right, the battery doesnt work. You get diseases if its not right. We can take the mitochondria from a normal egg and put them into an egg from the woman who has the condition. Fertilise that. You have prepared thing of it like an organ transplant. We transplant the mitochondria. To me just because you have a power pack doesnt make you a parent . Opponents are up in arms. One of the things they are raising is theres no way of knowing what the consequences have been. Could this be something that creates problems. There are too concerns. One is is it safe. You have to do it. You want to do if in the cells. I think we have seen enough evidence to say we are close to being sure you can make a healthy child. Were you 100 . Is medicine 100 sure. Until you try it in humans, you dont know. Im ready to say even how horrible these diseases are you probably cross the line. The other issue, you head down the road to designer babies. Im not willing to hold these babies hostage to the future. Im happy to have the fight about perfection or designer babies. Im not saying to the mum you cant get that fixed because 15 years from now well be freaking out about cryogenics. Plenty more to talk about down the road. Just a topic, with the latest on a story. The overuse of prescription antibiotics. The drugs are life savers for millions. Where antibiotics are concerned, less is more. A study for centers for Disease Control show some hospitals overtribe anti overprescribe antibiotics. Those that prescribed fewer saw fewer cases. For more im joined on the set by dr abdul alsaeed, an assistant professor at the Mailman School of public health. The head of the c. B. C. Said a modest eduction in unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing has major developments. Antibiotics are the best or have gotten us through a period of time where millions have been killed. The over use of anything good is bad. Antibiotics is a goto drug, even in situations where its a close call. Doctors will oversee the drugs. Maybe not following through the workup of the patient. To make sure they have infection, streeting them with antibiotics. When you over treat, what you do is select out versions, bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics of the future. This study. A striking thing about it found that some hospitals doctors at whole hospitals prescribed antibiotics three times than at other hospitals. How can that discrepancy it makes no sense statistically. How does it happen. Theres different cultures at different hospitals. As the culture may treat before infection, is picks up and becomes the culture of the hospital, the way people are trained. Some hospitals are more likely to treat patients that may have infectious diseases. Most of that is likely just a matter of culture. And the c d. C. Is trying to change the culture by coming up with a checklist of things. When hospitals look at how to treat or prescribe antibiotics. It leads doctors and hospitals to be accountable. Why did we wait until now. Its not as if the super bowl problem is new. We have to remember its part of an arms race between bacteria and antibiotics. Research, develop. What is happening is increasingly we are being pressed and seeing people with infections with bacteria that are not as easy to treat. You need to use two, three four. The c d. C. , recognising the situation saw the opportunity on the back of a recent study that you just discussed to put in stop a set of guidelines. They are nonsense call. When put into Institutional Policy can decrease the unnecessary use of antibiotics pushing the resistance. We had 2 million sick because of superbugs and 23 die. The president and his budget is asking to double the amount spent for detecting and preventing these things. Enough . Its never enough. But its a good step in the right distrctirection. What we need to do is step back. Like the park bench, we need to sit on it, but no one wants to pay for it. If you are a doctor and you have a patient and your patient is sick, you want to throe the biggest gun you have. When the doctors do that, its a matter of time when we treat people for the wrong antibiotics, we are giving too much, too little and all lead to the selection of bacteria that become like superbugs. Good to have you with us as always. Time to see what is trending on al jazeeras website. You were just talking about the growing concern over drug resistant bacteria. Our digital story stays in the medical round. A virus that was locked away was found in a block of soil. Once dug up scientists thawed the virus and watched it replicate and infected an organism. Its the largest virus to be discovered but poses little effect to people. It only effects singlecelled creatures. It may sort of that viruses could be revived. Now to your reaction you can read more at the website aljazeera. Com. Consider this will be right back. I thought that she was my property, and i could do as i please. Abusive men. This is completely unregulated. Easy access to guns. Theres somewhere around 1600 women being held every year a deadly combination. Death could have been prevented. Her and a hundred more women. It hurts to the core faultlines Al Jazeera Americas hard hitting. Ground breaking. Truth seeking. They dont wanna see whats really going on break though investigative documentary series death in plain sight only on Al Jazeera America and he said then this expletive is classified for a reason. How dash whatever his anger was, how did he go from someone that angry about leaks to what he became. So he wrote the stuff when working for the c. I. A. In switzerland. At the time he was of the system. He was more disillusioned as he saw more information that he thought was unconstitutional and re rowed with his superiors. He came up with a plan that he would leak the stuff to journalists, blowing the lid on everything. One of the things that comes to mind as you read through this and see he was a misfit, as you bring up the c. I. A. , he got work for a major spy agency. Without that, how does it happen . He was technically gifted and brilliant at computers. The n. S. A. Needs people that can do this stuff and also the other thing is there were 850 people in america with clearance for top secret. Many contractors and he was able to go inside the system without anyone noticing. You work for the guardian. You writ about the two people were shocked, when they saw this person in front of them. They have been corresponding with the source. They didnt have a name or a picture. They couldnt search on google and expect a guy in hong kong in a blue blazer. They get a lanky student type barely old enough to shave. When they talk and integrate him. He struggled with communicating with green world. He wanted to do everything in an encrypted way. This story had several falls starts. And glen is a terrific journalist. We have chat windows open and a tantalizing email. He didnt get around to doing it. Some of your book reads like a spy novel. There are all aspects going in that direction, including that you felt they may have been bugging you but getting into your computer and affecting it while you were working on it. I had a strange moment where i was writing something disparaging not nice about the n. S. A. , but my text started deleting. Everyone on the team had weird stories. The intelligence agencies wanted to know what was going on, what was to come and how much was being leaked. If they are that powerful, and we saw the spy shows and movies and those of us that like spy novels. Theres so much out there, we all know, you towned it yourself, you were able to figure out the stuff about D Edward Snowden because of what was posted years ago. If theres that enormous capacity, how in the world was this guy able to get the information out without them knowing. I think they were snoozing, an asleep on the job. Everyone informed me that he was asleep. Plus, they were looking out, not inside. They werent looking at one of their own. I think this will be a problem. Therell be other Edward Snowdens out there. Is he done . Hes done, but we are not down. We have a lot of material, we are sifting it. Some is technical. Therell be more revelations. What is next for him . That is a good question. Its a tricky question. Hes stuck in moscow. The russian government which is very much in the news has a strong interest in him. I fear hell be stuck in moscow. It will be better if they were somewhere else. The reality is hes trapped in putins moscow. As a guy that was conservative, do you think hes sorry he is it it . No, i think he wanted to start a debate. Boy has he done that. I think he succeeded. The bigger question is will he change the system. The answer may be know. But we know more than we did. The Edward Snowden files, the inside story. Nature is wonderous, but it can be brutal and horrifying. Our next guest loves it. Cann rhys kin is the author. He is the author. Great to have you with us. Great to be here. You start a book with a disgusting thing. The title of the book. How is Mother Nature trying to kill me . Mother nature has an idea that its a loving kind thing, that its balanced and if things are natural. It must be good for you. Its true, but on the whole Mother Nature is looking after itself. There are lots of predators, parasites and decomposers that would like nothing more than to take you apart. For me, its what makes nature for beautiful. Its the reason breaking bad is more fun to watch is the characters have a dark side. When you look across nature at dark things, you find niece things. You break up the books into different chapters, following the seven deadly sins, and your main presence is what characterises animals is a scroujlike selfishness. I equate it to scruj, he was greedy, only worried about himself. Animals dont care about the species or the eco system, just them. The great example is there are mice that were loose on an island in the south atlantic. Theres a bunch of see birth that lay their eggs. Everything was going fine. When the mice arrived in 1810, dropped off by humans, they ate eggs and seabird chicks alive and evolved. In the last 200 years, they are two to 300 times the size of normal mice and will swarm a living albat ros. Theyll vibe out the sea bird. Theyll die. They are thinking about themselves, not the eco system. You wrote your ph. D. At least sis about how vampire pats move across the ground. You talk about bat being a buzz kill for some frog . Yes. That are about to make love. One of the bats is the frogeating bat. And the frog that it eats is a tangara frog. A female will not mate with a guy, only one that shouts loudly. If you are that guy. Shouting loudly is a way to attract frogeating bats. They are stuck. Id like to pass on my d. N. A. , but i dont want to be eaten by a bat, you have an rhinella frog. Sometimes the female gets the upper hand like with a frog that will be eaten by the bat. Theres a male. And the mating season is so intense that many die. After they have died. Some males squeeze a dead female and get eggs and fertilise the eggs and reproduce. Its functional necrophilia. People thing nature is kindloving. They may be the first time those words were used together. Functional necrophilia. This is the beautiful stuff when you are like what, why . , im the oldest of six kids, and i thought i knew about sibling rivalries. Let start with the sand tiger sharks. The momma is pregnant with babies of different ages. When the oldest is big enough. It brakes out the egg sack, stay inside mum and eats siblings so it doesnt have to compete in the real world. And ver owes eagles. Mum lays two eggs. The first hatches, giving the older sib lipping a head start. When the older one hatch, it pecs, trying to kill siblings. It worked 199 times. One younger sibling survived. The researchers counted 1569 pecs over three days before the baby was dead. Snowy owls look beautiful. They are beautiful. They dont know how much food therell be. Theres a strategy of reproduction. The oldest gets all the food and only when full the next gets fed. And emperor penn gins. We love them. There was a movie, and the males are standing against the cold, they have an egg and its a story of working as a team. When you track the data, any male on the outside of the huddle will push it to the middle and stay there. Anyone in the middle will stay there. Theres a bunch of penn gins. We look at it saying, they are cooperating. Given where they live, we cant blame them. The book is Mother Nature is trying to kill you a lively tour through the dark side of the natural world. Well be back with more consider this. A special womans story received attention on oscar night the lady in number six, at 110 this woman was believed to be the oldest auschwitz civilor. The nazis moved her into a camp that was used for propaganda purposes. Alice passed away, but the film got the award for best Short Documentary film. A lot of journalists want to know, speak to me. Before they enter my room, they ask are we allowed to enter her room. So my answer is i never hate. Never hate. Hate red breeds only hatred. We are pleased to bridge back the winning film makers, Malcolm Clark and producer nick reed, joining us from los angeles. The lady of number six, is playing theatrically and debuts on netflix. You gave a wonderful tribute to alice and talked about her attitude. What made her so remarkable . She was she was a woman who always managed somehow miraculously given what she had gone through, to see the bright side of life. Her son died and she managed, through her grief, to be happy that he died without knowing that he was going to die. Quickly, without pain and suffering. When that can look at the dark experiences that we human being have and see the positive is remarkable. She talked about the attitude and expressed gratitude. Lets take a look at that. Sometimes it happens that i am thankful to have been there, because this im richer than other people. My reaction on life is all complain in is terrible, its not so terrible. How do you plan on bringing alices story to more people . We are trying to figure out how to put an educational plan together, and have young people in their formative years listen to their lady and understand a different perspective on how to live life, its breath taking. I want to talk about you guys. Malcolm, what is the response since you won the oscar, to her story. The count at this point is 800 and something emails ive forgotten in the last 24 hours. He was winning. I kale up in the backstraight. We are neck and neck. It was the tsunami of attention. From people that i forgot that i knew, and a lot of attention from you guys, which is fantastic. Have you let your oscars go at all. When you won, malcolm gave a beautiful speech, you were about to talk and the music played. Feel free to give your final words. I think he wanted to thank me. I dont know. Sometimes people realise how many get involved in making a fim. I want to give a shoutout to the guys. It was literally a labour of love. Everyone started the journey, to bring alices story to everyone. I want to thank our composer, which, considering hes up against some of the best ever, and has to put his music in between, i imagine he was crazy. Can you do a bit of filler. Fredrik bow bot, the producer. Chris brown. Phil, malcolms cowriter and editor. Tim marr low. Grant, ryan, kevin. Me. And malcolm clerk and nick read. I think the statute et cetera are there. And congratulate for the achievement and this marvellous win. I said to someone when we talking about having you on the show, if anyone is having a bad day, we shall see the lady in number six. This show my be over, you can continue the conversation on facebook, google , or aljazeera. Com considerthis. See you next time. This is aljazeera. Com. Im Jonathan Betz live in new york. Were starting to put a face to some of the passengers aboard a missing airline. One a father from texas. More Russian Forces spotted in crimea while president obama spends part of his vacation working the phones. Well suffer. 2014. Sarah palin rallies the troops at a big republican gallery near