Trademark Infringement | Except In Most Exceptional Cases , No Ex-Parte Injunction If Defendant Has Been In Market For Some Time: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that in cases where the impugned mark has been used by the defendant for any length of time, the courts must give an opportunity to the defendant to respond to the...

Related Keywords

Delhi ,India ,Gurgaon ,Haryana ,Nikhil Sabri ,Akshra Arshi ,Ajay Dubey ,Justicec Hari Shankar ,Harkirat Singh ,Tushar Singh ,Adarsh Chamola ,High Court ,Division Bench In Dabur ,Emami Ltd ,Wander Ltd ,Delhi High Court ,Division Bench ,Antox India Pvt Ltd ,Silvermaple Healthcare Services Private ,Dabur India Ltd ,Supreme Court ,Division Bench Of The Delhi High Court ,Dabur ,Division Bench In Dabur India Ltd ,Single Benches ,Pvt Ltd ,Silvermaple Healthcare Services Private Limited ,Trade Marks Act ,Non Competitional Confidentiality Agreement ,Severance Agreement ,Specific Relief Act ,Lakshay Makhija ,Trademark Infringement ,Interim Injunction ,Hearing Opportunity ,Abur India Ltd Vs Emami ,