Illustration: Eleanor Shakespeare/The Guardian
Illustration: Eleanor Shakespeare/The Guardian
Fri 16 Apr 2021 01.00 EDT
Last modified on Fri 16 Apr 2021 02.37 EDT
Plenty has been said about the politics of the governmentâs latest report on race. Barely any attention has been paid by most of the media to its actual evidence, even from supporters delighted that it has some. âThis report DOES have facts,â cooed Rod Liddle in the Sun, with the same sunny pleasure that a toddler might take from a book having words.
Yet the nature of those facts has barely been scrutinised by journalists. Instead, newspapers on the right have complained about âzealots of wokedomâ (the Express) and their âbaseless abuseâ (the Telegraph) of Tony Sewell, the commissionâs chief. As Matthew Syed wrote in the Sunday Times, âshouldnât this be on the evidence rather than the person who assembled it; shouldnât we play the ball rather than the man?â Fair enough, although he doesnât bother examining the evidence either. Not so much playing the ball as just being very chuffed thereâs something that looks like one.