The Marine Corps' Force Design 2030 Is Regression, Not Progress

The commandant’s vision seeks to prepare the Marine Corps for the contingency of a war with China in the Western Pacific, but committing the Marine Corps to a specific, unlikely conflict at the expense of the ability to meet a wide variety of other, more likely contingencies is a bad bet.

Related Keywords

Bangladesh ,Afghanistan ,Iraq ,Kuwait ,Mogadishu ,Banaadir ,Somalia ,China ,Italy ,Vietnam ,Republic Of ,Saudi Arabia ,Italian ,Iraqi ,Davidh Berger ,Asea Angel ,Walter Boomer ,James Mattis ,Erik Khzmalyan ,Ii Marine Expeditionary Force ,Us Embassy ,Us Navy ,Department Of Defense ,Ground Task Forces Spmagtfs ,Fleet Marine ,General David ,Nichols Act ,Marine Corps ,Integrated Priority List ,Fleet Commander ,Planning Guidance ,Navy Marine Corps ,Gulf War ,Force Design ,During Operation Desert Shield ,Marine Expeditionary Force ,Operation Desert Storm ,Marine Expeditionary Brigade ,Desert Storm ,Operation Eastern Exit ,Marine Expeditionary Unit ,Operation Provide Comfort ,Operation Sea Angel ,United Nations ,Operation Restore Hope ,Operation Continue ,Italian Marines ,Fleet Marine Forces ,Vietnam War ,Naval Support ,Operation Enduring Freedom ,Task Force ,Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Forces ,Western Pacific ,Force Design 2030 ,Us Marine Corps ,Gen David Berger ,Amphibious Warfare ,Indo Pacific ,