comparemela.com


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
A district court in the Eastern District of Texas granted a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss computer-implemented claims as patent-ineligible abstract ideas under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Patent is directed to credentialing visitors and checking them in and out of an access-controlled environment, and the court found that the alleged inventive concept was nothing more than applying technology to “a method of accomplishing [a] longstanding human activity.”
Plaintiff Repifi Vendor Logistics, Inc. sued IntelliCentrics, Inc. for infringing U.S. Patent No. 10,304,268 (“the ’268 Patent”). The ’268 Patent “is directed to a method for credentialing visitors to an access-controlled environment by an access administrator.” Specifically, the claimed method streamlines the credentialing and check-in/out processes for visitors to access controlled facilities (like health care facilities and office buildings) through a smart phone app that communicates with an electronic badge.

Related Keywords

Texas ,United States ,Jordan , ,Akin Gump Strauss Hauer Feld ,Plaintiff Repifi Vendor Logistics Inc ,Microsoft Corp ,Bank Intl ,Supreme Court ,Us Supreme Court ,Hp Inc ,Repifi Vendor Logistics Inc ,Alice Corp ,Intellicentrics Inc ,Akin Gump Strauss Hauer ,Eastern District ,Repifi Vendor Logistics ,Vendor Logistics ,டெக்சாஸ் ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,ஜோர்டான் ,மைக்ரோசாஃப்ட் கார்ப் ,வங்கி இந்தில் ,உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,எச்பி இன்க் ,ஆலிஸ் கார்ப் ,கிழக்கு மாவட்டம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.