comparemela.com


TribLIVE's Daily and Weekly email newsletters deliver the news you want and information you need, right to your inbox.
MONTGOMERY, Ala. — The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against an Alabama inmate whose lawyers argued that his trial counsel should have done more to try to show he is intellectually disabled and therefore he should be spared a death sentence.
In an unsigned 6-3 opinion, the conservative majority on Friday reversed an 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals finding and said that a state court had correctly rejected claims that Matthew Reeves had ineffective counsel at trial because they did not hire a neuropsychologist to present evidence he is intellectually disabled.

Related Keywords

Alabama ,United States ,Matthew Reeves ,Justice Sonia Sotomayor ,Willie Johnson ,Justice Elena Kagan ,Us Supreme Court ,Us Circuit Court , ,Sonia Sotomayor ,அலபாமா ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,மேத்யூ ரீவ்ஸ் ,நீதி சோனியா சொதோமாயோர் ,வில்லி ஜான்சன் ,நீதி எலெனா ககன் ,எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,எங்களுக்கு சுற்று நீதிமன்றம் ,சோனியா சொதோமாயோர் ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.