Thank you. Chair peskin supervisor preston . Supervisor preston yeah. I just want to thank you and supervisor safai for your work on this legislation. I think its incredibly important. I was a sponsor back on the original legislation, and i think its timely on the latest version. Id love to be added as a cosponsor, and i think that youve summed up the ordinance. I will say as to the sentiment of some callers who would prefer that we not regulate the private sector, i think that you know, i dont think that we can rely on what makes sense to the owners of commercial buildings and hotels to decide what kind of protections theyre going to extend to their staff and what kind of protections theyre going to extend to the general public and to their patrons. So they have a role to this, but our role is to make sure that we put safety precautions in this. I think its important that we move forward to protect workers and patrons, and as you said, to fulfill the confidence in visitors to the city, so id like to thank you and be added to it. Chair peskin thank you. And id like to thank my staff, sunny angulo, who has been trying to bring all of the various voices together, so thank you, miss angulo, for that. Vice chair safai . Supervisor safai let me talk for a moment. So were making this versus temporary, this is permanent . Thank you talk about does this outlast the pandemic and how that interplays, and just for clarity, i understand, but i want you to talk about that on the record. Chair peskin thank you, vice chair safai. So nothing is permanent. All of these pieces of legislation are creations of governmental bodies that can amend them, rescind them, extend them from time to time. The difference is we did this as an emergency ordinance. This would be an ordinance that would stay on the books until rescinded or further amendmeed and i suspect, as the pandemic rolls on, as regulations are relaxed, as tourism returns, we will have opportunities in the future to amend this. And as the medical field learns more and i do want to say to the speakers that invoked the the medical profession, all of us have been taking our queues from our chief Health Officer, and everything in this ordinance is consistent with the most recent guidance that was released by the chief Health Officer today, this very day, september 14 of 2020. Supervisor safai thank you. Thats really what i was looking for you to say, and i think its an important point that should not be lost, chair, and colleague preston. At the end of the day, we dont make these decisions in a vacuum. Theres been constant conversation with our county Health Officer, constand conversations as to public health, guidelines that have come down from the state, guidelines that have come down from the c. D. C. , and we have designed this in a way that ensures the safety of the our guests and workers that are employed in these buildings. My other point is the other thing that you said, we are no longer making this an emergency ordinance but will be a standard for the industry, so we can come back and look at that. Chair peskin and thank you, vice chair safai and supervisor preston for your cosponsorship. With that, i would like to move the amendments on that aforementioned ordinance. Roll call, please. Clerk on the motion [roll call] clerk you have three ayes. Chair peskin okay. Next item, please. Clerk on the remaining balance . Chair peskin oh, im sorry. On the remaining items as amended. Clerk to continue next week or to the call of the chair . Chair peskin no. These amendments are nonsubstanti nonsubstantive, madam deputy City Attorney ann pearson, am i correct . You are correct. Chair peskin on the motion, roll call, please. Clerk on the motion as stated [roll call] clerk you have three ayes. Chair peskin thank you. Sorry about that, madam clerk. Item 3, please. Clerk id 3 is an ordinance amending the planning code to allow certain limited restaurants in the north beach special use district to convert to restaurants that may apply for liquor licenses. Each speaker will be allowed Public Comments which to speak by calling 4156550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1469631010. Again, thats 1469631010. Press pound, and pound again. When connected, you will be in listening mode and muted. If you have not done so already, press star, three to be entered into the queue to speak. Chair peskin thank you. Are there any speakers wishing to speak on this item today . First speaker, please. Clerk thank you, mr. Chair. James from d. T. Is checking to see if we have any callers in queue. And you may unmute the first caller here. Operator thank you. Clerk thank you. You may begin. Youre unmuted. Yeah, you know, just be careful with this ceqa, because david chair peskin sir, this has nothing to do with seekceqa. Im sorry. Were speaking about the conversion of limited restaurants to full restaurants. Then why does it say it . Chair peskin because it has been determined to be exempt from ceqa. Sorry. Please proceed, sir. Operator i believe he has taken his hand down. Chair peskin next speaker, please. Operator there are no other speakers. Chair peskin seeing no other speakers on this item that has been heard and amended, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues, i would like to make a motion to send this to the full board as a Committee Report for hearing tomorrow, september 15. On that item, madam clerk, a roll call, please. Clerk on the motion as stated [roll call] clerk you have three ayes. Chair peskin next item, please. Clerk item number 4 is an ordinance ordering the vacation of streets in the india basin project site located generally at innes avenue between griffith street and earl street along the india basin shoreline, reserving temporary public utility and access rights in favor of the city and temporary easement rights for existing pg e. Each speaker will be allowed Public Comments which to speak by calling 4156550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1469631010. Again, thats 1469631010. Press pound, and pound again. When connected, you will be in listening mode and muted. If you have not done so, press star, three to be entered into the lineup. You only need to press star, three one to be entered into the queue. Chair peskin thank you, madam clerk. I cannot remember if supervisor preston was on the board when we worked on this agreement. Weve got jonathan cherry. Mr. Cherry, if you would like to make a brief presentation. Thank you, chair peskin, members of the community. Im a worker from oewd. So i can, lets see, figure out how to share my screen. Chair peskin this is pretty straightforward, so you can compress it. So we this is an implementing legislation, streetfication legislation to remain certain easements in the street study, and this coincides with certain conveying of streets to the project sponsor, and this would happen in parallel to an exchange of properties where the city would actually receive more land than it conveys. We did talk about this previously in committee, and the legislation is being now identical to the legislation thats going back to the full board with a couple minor amendments at the previous meeting. So im happy to take questions. Chair peskin so basically, the city would quitclaim its interest in the right of way thats earl hudson and Aurelius Walker, and then authorize the city to transfer about an acre within Aurelius Walker drive and hudson and earl and galvez to the state for a public trust exchange. Is that does that sum it up . That about sums it up, sir, yes. And i have a presentation within [inaudible]. Chair peskin all right. Lets run through it. All right. I wasnt able to share my screen previously, but now, i can. Okay. You will be able to see this now. Chair peskin we see your icon but not your okay. There we go. Okay. The board approved the project on october 23, 2018. There are two components to this project, both of which are to be delivered by the developer, build. First, theres a mixeduse Development Including almost 1600 newhousing units, in which 394 of those so 25 , would be affordable units, with publicly accessible open space, including the privately owned india basin open space and an expanded portion of open space on the southeast Waterfront Network of parks. So just to to recap, the Development Agreement includes a number of other Public Benefits. I can briefly run through these chair peskin yeah, im totally familiar supervisor preston, were you on the board at that time . Do you need this . Because i know that supervisor safai and i are very familiar with the Public Benefits set out in the d. A. Supervisor preston no. Ive read through the materials, so i dont need chair peskin okay. Keep going, mr. Cherry. Happy to move forward. Thank you. So the ordinance, as i mentioned, implements aspects of the Development Agreement previously approved. The Development Agreement contemplated this streetification and authorized the advance of some of the rightofway to the developer. Part of it would be retained by the city as part of the india basin open space. It authorizes certain privately owned parcels to be granted to the city and approves a Public Land Trust Exchange Agreement between the state and the developer in order to clarify the existence of the public trust status on the park area near the bay and remove the public trust status from the private parcels on the upper part of the site. Chair peskin mr. Cherry, the state Lands Commission has approved that, is that correct . No, sir. The state Lands Commission is scheduled to hear this item hopefully in late october, so weve been working with state lands staff, but they will see the agreement that this board has already seen hopefully in october, and the idea would be when that trust exchange occurs, this has already occurred. Chair peskin okay. Thats why theres some hurry to this matter. Yes. Chair peskin okay. Proceed. In slide 5, you see the existing site, also referred to 700 innes. You can see innes along the bottom of the slide, and the site extended from there to the bay, between griffith street on the left of the slide to earl street on the right of the slide chesk thats whe slide. Chair peskin thats where shawn is. Thats where shawn the sheep is. Thats right. Here on slide 6, this is the existing ownership. In red are all of the portions of the slide that are currently privately owned. The solid green portions near the shoreline of a rec park india basin open space. In blue are the areas that would be vacated by the ordinance, and that consists of rightofway under the jurisdiction of parks and chair peskin and mr. Cherry, these are all paper streets, with the exception of Aurelius Walker. Yes. The rest are mostly grass and dirt. [inaudible] at all times, even before the permanent access is built. Chair peskin so that would be a nonexclusive easement. It would be i would ask deputy City Attorney day if she could weighin on that. She might good afternoon. Yes, thats my understanding. Chair peskin hi. Hi. How are you, supervisor. Good afternoon. Yes, that is my understanding. Chair peskin perfect. Excellent. And on the next slide, this is just here for your reference. This illustrates the 7. 3 acres of privately owned land will become public as part of the public trust exchange, and the citys acceptance of new streets, so these are not part of the streetification ordinance, so that everyone can see the full picture. This consists of 2. 3 acres in the lighter shade of green that will be added to the public trust, along with 2. 6 acres in turquoise that will be public park but outside the trust boundaries, and finally, 5. 8 acres of city streets that will be improved by build and accepted by the city afterwards shown in dark green. Heres just a final ownership area of the site. The areas in light green and turquoise will be owned by the city. The areas in dark green will be owned by the city in public streets, and the areas in light green will be owned by build. Chair peskin and mr. Cherry, while it is not material to the items that were discussing today, relative to Sea Level Rise protections, can you speak to this . Yes. So the project includes a well, there are a couple components. So there is a raising of the elevations of the site, a significant rise of elevation of both the developed the area that will be the next use development as well as portions of the park. There are also, i would say passes, mitigation efforts that are going to be constructed wetlands, improved sort of shore protection along the northside here. Y here, to sort of reinforce the dune areas, both seasonal and tidal. Its increasing the elevation of the site. Chair peskin and thats 900 innes, to my left . Yes. To the left is the [inaudible] thats right. Right here is the corner of what is currently griffith and in the future will be new hudson is the shipwrights cottage, and india basin and 900 innes and the park here are screened here, so all of this would be integrated with that. Chair peskin got. It anythi got it. Anything else to add, mr. Cherry . Not really. This is where we are, and we hope that this would take us to an effective earliest streetification in early november as discussed. Chair peskin thank you. Any questions . On behalf of the project sponsor, anything to add or subtract . Im here. I was muted. Sorry. Chair peskin, how are you . Chair peskin having of time of my life. My, too. Supervisor safai and supervisor preston, nice to see you. No, we would like to move this as quickly as move. Six years into it now, were probably going to be eight years into it before we actually get going, but we would like to get this to fruition for the neighborhood and the city and, you know, for build. So thats thats about all ive got. Chair peskin i like it. Nice and piffy. Are there any members of the public who would like to comment on this item . Clerk thank you, mr. Chair. Operations chair peskin do we have any speakers . Clerk go ahead. Operator im sorry. Ill go ahead and unmute. I have one caller. Hi, supervisors. Thank you. My name is kristin houck. Im a bayview resident and business owner, and id like to speak on behalf of this project. Id like to see it moving forward for the community. I have previous experience working with build, and theyre great in a partnership. Thank you. Chair peskin thank you. Are there any other speakers for this item . Operator that was the only raised hand. Chair peskin okay. Public comment is closed, and colleagues, if theres knno objection, i would like to move this item to the full board with recommendation. On that motion, madam clerk, a roll call, please. Clerk on the motion as stated [roll call] clerk you have three ayes. Chair peskin all right. The motion is passed. Next item, please. Clerk item number 5 is an ordinance accepting certain Public Infrastructure improvements to for purposes of city maintenance and liability, including the streets and stormwater pump station in the mission bay. Each speaker will be allowed Public Comments which to speak by calling 4156550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1469631010. Again, thats 1469631010. Press pound, and pound again. When connected, you will be in listening mode and muted. To enter the queue, press star, three. The system will indicate you have been muted, and please wait until you have been unmuted to provide Public Comment. Chair peskin from public works, we have [inaudible]. Thank you. Mark hennesey is going to start this off. Chair peskin all right. Who knew . Thank you [inaudible] my name is [inaudible] and im with the San Francisco public works committee. Im happy to say we are now at the back end of the Mission Bay Development, so i do have a presentation here, which i hope to share with everyone. I will be brief and quick. Everyone can see my slides . Chair peskin yep. Okay. So just to orientate everyone as to the Mission Bay Development, top of the page is third street on the northside. What you see highlighted is in the various areas is approximately nine blocks that we are requesting for it to be accepted into the city infrastructure. [please stand by] in response, as part of the the discussions with Mission Bay Development and there have been some funding from Tax Increment Funding put aside in the possibility of that occurrence should happen. And there was a possibility that within your package of approximately 20 million that is set aside for the p. U. C. , along with up to 300,000 for public works and potential. And it is a potential and thats why its put as a set aside. I defer to mark who may have a little bit more history on the agreements that have been discussed with Mission Bay Development. Chair peskin do you want to discuss that and who has the out year liability and why you think that 20 million is enough and how the finance mechanisms work . Okay. The outlying liability is the city. The pipes and sewer line that have been identified to date have had some little dips in them but theres no major sinking in the mud. Theyre all functional. All hooked up to all of the vertical development. So, i mean, there is concerns Going Forward. The financial thing is that theres tax increments that are until 2028 that the developer has the rights to use and can authorize that use to go towards some of these pipes that have been identified that arent in perfect shape. Chair peskin the right or the obligation . And if the developer didnt use it to o on that, what did the developer use it on . What is it being taken away from . If the developer doesnt use it and its going to the general fund. But as of right now there hasnt been any deterioration where we had to open up streets and replace any of the water lines on the streets. We have had issues with sidewalk sinking, which is are the responsibility of the adjacent property owners, but all of the underlying infrastructure, like i said, theres concerns that there might be a couple dips here and there, but no major, you know, issues that have arisen at all. Chair peskin and have we done geotechnical studies . Is this subsidence, what is this . You havent done any studies. Minei mean, studies were done beforehand when the engineers were designing it to put in the proper base to install the infrastructure. The city and the thirdparty geotechs, along with the city staff, were observing the work going in. So as to this time, i think that the settling on the sidewalks, its a different issue. Im not sure if that was pile supported or had the infrastructure base that is put in for the storm and sewer lines. Chair peskin how much inches have the sidewalk sunk at their height . I think that the worst, the corner of fourth and china basin, was 12inches, which is probably what they thought was the worst area in mission bay. Chair peskin and that did not put any downward pressure on the subsurface infrastructure . We havent noticed any damage occurring to the as i said were hooked up to the laterals. Chair peskin and is that a function of the fact that youve got flexibility in those laterals . Have you done any studies about whether or not the sidewalks are going to reach some level of equilibrium . Do we know at what point we expect the infrastructure to fail . Do we know if these streets are continuing to settle . I think that at the worst its kind of where geotech got would be the worst. And so i think that the streets have been in place for a long time and the majority of the settling starts in the first five years, 10 years, so were already there. But specifics to your question, we dont know exactly. Chair peskin so we dont have any report look, we got a report saying that the millennium would sink the millennium tower, four to six inches over its lifetime and its tripled that by now. Yeah. Chair peskin so doe we have a geotechnical report that says that wed have subsidence or compaction that would lead to what is a truly startling number of inches its a foot at fourth and china basin. Do we have reports that say that is what we predicted . Do we have any reports that say that we dont predict anymore . Because, otherwise, why would me and my colleagues want to accept more liability . I assume if we dont accept it, its on the developer to deal with this after tax increment expires in 2028. I know that the city is determined to complete. We tell the developer that it is complete per the requirements. So i dont know what happens if we decide to not accept the infrastructure. And currently the city is licensing all of the infrastructure to use it. I mean, in order to to charge monthly fees to use this infrastructure. So were currently licensing it. Chair peskin madam deputy City Attorney, would you like to give us advice before i open up to Public Comment and suggest that we continue this to a closed session . Chair peskin, id like to see if i could get the addressing of these questions. She would bhe would be more familiar with this. Chair peskin good afternoon, john. Any Public Comment on this item number 5 . Thank you, mr. Chair peskin. Checking to see if we have any callers in queue. We have no callers in queue. Chair peskin okay, Public Comment is closed and while we wait for the deputy City Attorney, madam clerk, hold off on whatever we decide to do on this item. Read item number 6. Clerk yes. Item number 6 is an ordinance amending the planning code and zoning map to rezone certain parcels in the industrial use districts to production, distribution and repair and other use districts and affirming the appropriate findings. The members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment on item number 6 should dial star, 3 im sorry, call 1 415 6550001. The meeting i. D. Is 146 963 1010. Press pound and pound again. If you are in line for item number 5, press star, 3, to get out of the queue. If you are already in queue, if you would chair peskin we closed Public Comment on item clerk i apologize. So you can press star, 3, to line up to speak. Thank you. Chair peskin thank you. This item was brought to us by the Planning Department and it was voted for unanimously by the Planning Commission. Mr. Sanchez, diego sanchez, from the department of city planning, who is the only person on this call who is wearing a tie, the floor is yours. [laughter]. Yes, supervisors, good afternoon. Diego sanchez with the Planning Department staff. Today ill present you an ordinance to amend the zoning map to reclassified properties, largely in the m1 and m2 Industrial Districts to production distribution and repair or p. D. R. Districts. And it amends the planning code to clarify the retail limits and to accommodate the submitted permit applications under proposed new zoning controls. Supervisors, the Industrial Districts are the citys oldest Industrial Districts still in use. These districtsa allow the gamut of industrial uses, including heavy foot traffic, noise generation and nextou noxious emissions. And they allow retail and housing. The question has been there for some time. Sensitive uses like offices adjacent to the m districts and the need to balance compatibility and quality of life with the land has arisen. As a result, the city, through the eastern neighborhoods bayview and other comprehensive Planning Efforts over the last 20 years has substantially rezoned most mzone parcels. Those mzone parcels that remain today are hot pieces of land and Public Infrastructure that were accidental omissions or oversights from the previous rezoning efforts. This proposed rezoning cleans up and rezones most of the remaining parcels. It largely rezones railways and public rightsofway with p. D. R. And public uses such as the wastewater plant and the other properties either our age or mixeduse district. The senate bill 330, the housing crisis act of 2019, requires that the cities when reducing housing capacity to expand it elsewhere at a commensurate level and at the same Effective Date of those two actions. The mZoning Districts allow housing with conditionaluse authorization. Mr. Of the proposed Zoning Districts such as the p. D. R. Allow homeless shelters but do not allow other types of housing. To comply, the staff have a potential of each property proposed for rezoning and quantify the lost housing capacity. Any reductions to be offset by an increase in zoning capacity afforded by another project. The staff aimed to time this industrial rezoning with the market octavia hub rezoning. However, the staff is proposing to link this rezoning to another project. To do this the staff is requesting the city to amend the proposal before you to do so. It currently reads that this ordinance is linked to market octavia and we propose language that was sent to you already to mention the reservoir project. Theres one last recommended or requested amendment and staff is recommending modification of the proposed language on page 6, lines 810. This is language on note 22, the p. D. R. Zoning table, and its language that the Planning Commission recommended unanimously at its april adoption hearing but did want maknotmake it into the ordinance before you for clerical errors or something to that nature. So the staff also recommend that you amend the ordinance before you to include the language that also was sent to you and im happy to read to you or to share my screen to show you the language for note 22. In a nutshell, what it does is to accommodate the selfstorage project that is working its way down the pipeline. What it does is bulk up the grandfathering language to allow f. A. R. S. So thats my conclusion thats the conclusion of my presentation and im definitely here for questions. Thank you. Chair peskin thank you, mr. Sanchez. Any questions from members, seeing none, any Public Comment on item number 6 . We have one person in the queue. Chair peskin first speaker, please, and look at this moon cake. Happy autumn moon festival. Go ahead. Caller theres a number of statements made by somebody who said that he was going to present something and i doubt that the supervisors heard the content of trying to build homes on industrial land. And in the middle of the socalled presentation, trying to make a connection with the reservoir that we were hoodwinked by the board of supervisors. And earlier on in life, i was n but for some reason i wasnt called. Its land to liquefaction, and the developer builds the infrastructure and walks away and theres no checks and balances and how to after the fact you want to remedy something. Why are we losing sight of qualityoflife issues . Why are we trying to hoodwink the public in broad daylight on zoning that is dubious in nature . You all dont seem to be i think that, you know, this corruption this corruption is blatant corruption and its filtered down to the planning, through the board of supervisors. Whewhen it comes to accountabil, we cant have somebody coming out and giving a presentation and then, you know, he pointed arrows in the air and youre going to go and move this to the board of supervisors. And you notice with this virtual socalled meetings, nobody wants to participate. So who is responsible for bringing this type of methods to the public and yet the public cannot, you know, really get information about it . Clerk thank you. Mr. Chair, unmute. Chair peskin thank you, mr. De costa. Any other members of the public to speak to item number 6 . There are no more Public Comments. Chair peskin okay, Public Comment on item 6 is closed. And i would like to take the two amendments that the Planning Commission and mr. Sanchez have suggested, the First Amendment which places the market octavia with the balboa reservoir, and the second one note 22 at page 6 from lines 810 previously described, i would make that motion. Madam clerk on that motion, a roll call, please. Clerk on the motion as stated, supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor safai. Safai, aye. Supervisor peskin. Peskin, aye. You have three ayes. Chair peskin and then i would like to make a motion to send the item as amended to the full board as a Committee Report for hearing tomorrow, september 15, 2020. On that motion, a roll call, please. Clerk on the motion to update, supervisor preston. Preston, aye. Supervisor safai. Safai, aye. Supervisor peskin. Peskin, aye. You have three ayes. Chair peskin that motion passes and lets circle to item 5. Deputy City Attorney, i dont know how much you got to hear about my questions with regard to accepting the rightsofway pursuant to the completed work, pursuant to even before my time in 1998 d. D. A. , so if you can try to help us with that. And anything that we cant talk about in open session we can talk about in a closed session of this committee or other committees or the full board. And one question, what is that flag, mr. Malamut . John malamut from the City Attorneys office to the chair. This is a proposed redo of the San Francisco flag of the phoenix that i think that is gaining popularity in the last six or seven months. In response to the question about the subsidence, i would mention a few things. The Public Utilities commission did a video survey of all of the lines within the last two years i think they did a lot of work in 2019. So they have identified the areas where they think that there are some issues that may in part be a result of subsidence. But they fully have identified those issues and 20 million Tax Increment Fund that was mentioned is available to do those repairs at a subsequent time when it makes sense and it can be done with suggestion and other issues in the mission bay area. So the notion of subsidence was understood back in 1998 when the project was approved and when the first proposals for street design were set out. And the public works and the other city departments involved in the review understood that and approved the permits and inspected the work. So if the city were to proceed with this action, which is to accept the streets for maintenance and liability purposes, as was pointed out the sidewalks and any subsidence on the sidewalks and transitions and things like that would be the responsibility of the adjacent property owners. And the street, if there were further issues with it, would be city responsibility to repair. The kind of street im not an engineer but the kind of street design that the city approves is the whole street kind of moves together as i understand it in large panels. So as far as i know theres been no sort of differential settlement. So the streets are would move as a whole, at least in the street segment where the panels of concrete are. And so i think that the video work that the p. U. C. Has done in the last few years is sort of a good indication of what the city has experienced. And i do not know if that would necessarily increase or to be worse, but the fund is available to address that. Chair peskin and, mr. Malamut, is this joint or separated trench . As i understand it, theres a joint utility trench for all of the dry utilities. Chair peskin and separated from wha other utilities . Correct. Chair peskin okay. So relative to the value calculation on the 20 million, does that assume the current status of the sinking and presumably flexible joints that could fail . Is that a projection of future subsidence and failure over time . Are there projections of what future subsidence might look like . And is that 20 million enough to do it over time . I dont know i cant speak to all of those questions. One that i can address, however, through the chair, is that as i recall that the 20 million was based on a snapshot from todays costs. But there is a c. P. I. Indexing chair peskin so it was escalated over time . Right. So if the p. U. C. Doesnt undertake work on a particular street until 10 years from now, if there are increased c. P. I. Costs to perform what is the estimated work for that street, that would be covered. Chair peskin right. But theres no actual analysis or predictions of future subsidence and future costs . Theres just escalation of current known problems and escalation of costs over time for those known problems . I am not aware that theres been studies of projections of what could happen in the future beyond now. Chair peskin well, let me ask you this, mr. Malamut, and, by the way, these are things that should be answered by ocii or public works, but thank you for being incredible counsel to those organizations for many decades. What would happen if we didnt accept . Through the chair, i think that under chair peskin i am the chair. So directly to the chair, i think that under that circumstance, that the board might have a few options. You could direct the department of public works to work with the Development Team to undertake some additional studies that would give you information that might provide more comfort to the board of supervisors before you would proceed. I think that if the board did not proceed, we would have to look through the very sort of complex documents that compromise the Mission Bay South redevelopment plan. Theres the owner participation agreement, and a d. D. A. And an acquisition agreement. Wed have to probably do a fairly thorough legal analysis of what are the rights and remedies of the various parties, parties,ocii, the city, and the Development Team under those circumstances. Chair peskin thank you, counsellor. Mr. Hemr. Hennessey, anything t . When they did build it there was geotechnical analysis to understand the subsidence that would occur. Thats when they did the geotechnical analysis. Chair peskin you tell me that in 1998, they thought that fourth and china basin would sink a foot, really . I think they thought that it would be pretty bad. The master developer is here to speak as well, he could probably speak to that if you wanted to hear what he has to say on this. Chair peskin no, im interested in hearing what people have to say, but i actually want somebody to produce the line in a geotech report or an environmental document from, you know, from 22 years ago that actually says that we predicted that level of subsidence. I would also like to see a document that shows how much subsidence Going Forward and what those costs are and whether the 20 million estimated over time, it was sufficient to deal with that as the remaining tax increment that well have for a few more years before ocii ceases to exist. So i would like to take this offline. Im happy to do this in public, theres nothing secret about it. But i would like to have some conversations with public works, the City Attorney and ocii about this and im i mean, i can continue to another meeting here. We can actually delve down into these documents, but i would like to make a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair. But i look forward to working with you, deputy City Attorney malumat and mr. Hennessey and whoever else we have to work on this. But im not for one ready to accept this unknown liability unless i really understand it. So are there any questions or comments from vice chair safai or member preston . Seeing none, madam clerk, id like to make a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair. Clerk so this would need to be renoticed for 10 days to the call of the chair. Chair peskin it would have to be renoticed for 10 days once i decide when to recalendar it if im still the chair of this committee on that. A roll call, please. Clerk the motion as stated by supervisor peskin and supervisor preston . Aye. Supervisor safai. Safai, aye. Supervisor peskin. Peskin, aye. You have three ayes. Chair peskin thank you. We are adjourned. Vice president taylor welcome to what is going to be the continued meeting from august 19 as well as concurrently the september 2 meeting of the San Francisco Police Commission. As some of you may be aware, we lost quorum at the last Police Commission meeting due to technical difficulties beyond our control. So at that time, we had completed the chiefs report, the d. P. A. Directors report, and line item 1 before we had to adjourn. Were going to pick up tonight where we left off, so its going to be the president ial report, commission report, and Public Comment. We want to make sure the public has an opportunity to comment on items from the august 19 agenda. So thats how were going to proceed, and then after that, we will continue the remaining items on the september 2 and tonights meeting, and once thats done, we will adjourn that meeting and begin september 2. As always, im going to ask Public Commenters to reduce public noise, turn down the television. If you want to be heard, put your name in the chat. Commissioner youngblood, can you please call roll. Clerk yes, thank you, commissioner. [roll call] clerk you have a quorum. Also here tonight is chief w l William Scott from the San Francisco Police Department. Vice president taylor i wanted to say that the public will notice we have a new commissioner, and oddly enough, shes probably why every Single Member of this commission is on this commissioner. Commissioner malia cohen, welcome to your first Police Commission thank you very much. So i just wanted to, you know, just straight believe that share in my beliefs that i believe in transparency, and i believe in the examining of data and accountability and also support the positive moves toward Police Reform. And as you know, im a soontobe new mother, and im aware that we need to do a lot of work in order to create a very safe and stable future for those of us that are not only here today but for future generatio generations. So i just want to say to everyone here, thank you, and thank you to the mayor who had the confidence in me to appoint me to the commission. Im excited to be here, and with that, commissioner taylor, i turn it back to you. Thank you. Vice president taylor thank you. Okay. So can you please call the next item on the agenda, sergeant . Clerk yes. Line item 1, reports to the commission, continued from august 19, 2020. Commission reports. Commission reports will be limited to a brief description of activities and announcements. Commission discussion will be limited to determining whether to calendar any of the issues raised for a future Commission Meeting. Commission president s report, commissioners reports, and Commission Announcement and scheduling items identified for condition at future Commission Meetings, action. Vice president taylor i dont see any names in the chat, so seeing none, lets move onto the next item. Clerk item 2, discussion and possible action to adopt the Community Ambassador Program Manual, continued to september 2, 2020. Vice president taylor okay. Item 3 . Clerk item 3 is Public Comment. Vice president taylor this is general Public Comment that you werent able to provide on august 19 because of the technical difficulties. If you wish to provide Public Comment, please do so now. Clerk members of the public are welcome to address the commission up to two minutes on items that do not appear on the agenda for august 19 but that are within the subject matter jurisdiction. Commission. Speakers shall address they remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department or d. P. A. Personnel. Under Police Commission rules of order, during Public Comment, Neither Police or d. P. A. Personnel nor commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. Individual commissioners and police and d. P. A. Personnel should refrain, however, from entering into any debates or discussion with speakers during Public Comment. So far, commissioner, we have one Public Comment. Vice president taylor okay. Operator good evening, caller. You have two minutes. Caller, you are unmuted, and you have two minutes. Are you there . Okay, commissioner, i will go to the next caller. Okay. Caller, you have two minutes. Commissioners, i wanted to call you tonight to ask you to produce a reasoned plan to defund the police as tens of thousands of your constituents are calling for in the street. I understand that what was done before is clearly unacceptable, and now, as we move forward, i would love to see this commission take responsibility solely for the actions of its brutal and corrupt organization where you have members taking obscene amounts of over time. I certainly dont think theres any reason to be harassing random participants in a band in a park, and yet, weve managed to turn up six cops in riot gear. I certainly dont think there is any reason to respond to levels in force that you guys have to the protest, yet for every individual small group of people, youve managed to surface 30 or 40 Police Officers. That seems to be the only function that the Police Department has, and i would ask whether large portions of that task might better go undone. And i dont imagine any other organization has the capability to recommend which of those tasks shouldnt be done by the Police Department better than this commission. So im asking the commission to man up, do its job, and figure out how to come up with a Police Department that is responsive to what the people actually want and not abusive as its primary and almost exclusive function. Vice president taylor thank you, caller. Next caller. Operator good evening, caller. You have two minutes. Caller, you have been unmuted. You have two minutes. Commissioner, that is all for Public Comment. Vice president taylor thank you. Next line item . Clerk line item 4, closed session. Continued to september 2, 2020. Vice president taylor thank you. Next item. Clerk line item five, for the adjournment of the august 19 meeting. Vice president taylor can i have a motion for the adjournment of the august 19, 2020 meeting. Commissioner hamasaki are we done . So moved. Commissioner hamasaki ill second. Clerk okay. On the adjournment of the august 19, 2020 meeting [roll call] clerk commissioner taylor, you have six yeses. Vice president taylor okay. How do we do this procedurally, opening the next meeting . Ill leave that to you, sergeant. Clerk okay. So for the meeting of september 2, 2020, we are roll call for this meeting, as well. Vice president taylor okay. Clerk roll call for the meeting of september 2, 2020 [roll call] clerk commissioner taylor, you have a quorum. And also, we have present chief of police William Scott and [inaudible]. Vice president taylor and i dont think you included me in the roll, but im present, as well. Clerk and commissioner taylor is present. Vice president taylor all the same rules apply. Phone number 4156550001, meeting i. D. 1461408360. Commissioners, put your hand up if you want to make comments. Next line item. Clerk item 1, adoption of minutes for the meeting of august 12, 2020. Commissioner cohen i make a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner hamasaki did somebody move . Commissioner cohen yes, i did. Okay. And second. Clerk for line item 1, adoption of minutes [roll call] Vice President taylor next line item . Clerk item 2, reports to the commission, discussion. Chiefs report. Weekly crime trends, provide an overview of offenses occurring in San Francisco. Major significant incidents. Provide a summary of planned activities and events. This will include a brief overview of any unplanned events or activities occurring in San Francisco having an bakt on Public Impact on Public Safety. Commission discussion on unplanned events and activities the chief describes will be limited to determining whether to calendar for a future meeting. Presentation of the safe streets for all Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 2020. Presentation of the fdrb findings and recommendations and o. I. S. Investigative summaries, first and Second Quarter 2020. Hi, commissioner cohen. Commissioner cohen nice to see you. I just want to talk a little bit about the training ive mentioned it to the commission before. Training was created and implemented in 2018, and basically, the course was developed and designed to reinforce [inaudible] tactics to involve less lethal. As you know, weve decreased our pointings of firearms and the use of force in the chapter 96a report, but we do believe that this training that we have creates has addressed gaps and really led to more effective leadership in the field. The training actually emphasizes the principles of deescalation which has been embraced by members. Its all about coordination, decision making, response, and effective decision making. We have significantly reduced the pointing of a firearm, which is actually our biggest category of use of force from where it was in 2016, when we started to track this information until to now. Theres been almost a 70 reduction in the pointing of firearms. And also, the percentage of use of forces that involve pointing of firearms has gone from down from about 70 in 2016 to 44 of our total use of force this year, so its really a good thing that this training was recognized by the International Association of chiefs of police. I think it shows, once again, that our city is on the forefront of trying to make things better in policing, and i just want to give my hats off to everybody. The training unit, commander Denise Flaherty who was the lead on this, and the participating members. Together, weve trained 1,540 members, and we believe its had an impact on the way weve trained for Critical Incidents and leading to better yut comes for Critical Incidents. Outcomes for Critical Incidents. Wanted to start with our crime trend. Overall, we are down 28 from last weeks crime. Compared to 20192020, were down 20 . Our total property crimes were down 21 . However, we are still up in homicide 23 up in homicide. We did not have any homicides this past week, which is good news, but we still have a lot of work to do in terms of our homicides for this year. We had seven in the month of august, and the previous month, in july, we had five. Of the yeartodate cases, weve cleared 13 of the yeartodate cases, and weve also cleared some of our older cases. I know there is a desire by commissioner brookter to talk about some of our shooting incidents. There are several districts that are up. The two that are most concerning are the ingleside district, with an increase of 100 of shooting incidents, and thats six 12 in 2020 compared to six in 2019. Tenderloin also has a significant increase. There is seven in 2019, 16 this year. Were talking about total shooting incidents. Bayview has one more shooting incident than they did last year, and mission has one more shooting incident than they did this time last year. Bayview, that number is 29 compared to 28, and mission is nine compared to 8. Of the remaining six districts, everyone else has had a decrease in shooting incidents. The most significant decrease is central, who went from five to one, and thats the individual breakdown of the individual districts. We, again, have a presentation scheduled with our crime strategies directors on what we are doing to reduce shootings and to work not only shortterm but longterm, so were looking forward to that presentation. In terms of property crime, we are still struggling with burglaries. Were up significantly in burglaries, which is alarming. The biggest trend were seeing are garage burglaries with items like bicycles, tools, small things that can be carried out. We are up significantly, with over 1300 more burglaries than this time last year. Our Motor Vehicle thefts are also up significantly, 900 more than this time last year, a little bit more than 900. Whats driving the decrease in total property crimes are our overall thefts are down significantly, 35 , which is a large number. Were down almost over 8,000 theft incidents than we were this time last year, and that includes our car burglaries, which are down significantly from this time last year. Overall, we are down, but we still have some significant concerns in terms of our property crime. In terms of individual cases, we had four shooting incidents that id like to brief the commission and the public on on 8 or august 30, 2020. Officers arrived and found a victim down on the 100 block of gonzalez, in the ingleside district. The victim was talking to a female, and shots rang out, and it was unknown the origin of the gunshots. The victim is expected to survive but was injured. On that same day at 2 00 p. M. , a victim stated he was walking in the area when he felt gunshots and felt weak. He was taken to the hospital, and it appeared that there was some sort of physical altercation that the victim was involved in before he was shot, so that one is still under investigation. Were trying to find witnesses for that case, as well. On august 29, at 4 23 p. M. , a victim was walking near the San Francisco general hospital, when a car pulled up and he felt pain in his leg. He was transported to San Francisco general, and no suspects have been arrested in that case. On august 26, 11 33 p. M. , two victims were sitting in a vehicle when two suspects started walking up and started shooting. One victim suffered a graze to the buck and the other a gunshot wound to the leg. They selftransported to the hospital, and both were listed in stable condition. We have some leads on that, but we have not made an arrest in that case as of yet. Moving onto major events, we continue to monitor protests in the city. We have not had any significant incidents over this past week. There are many of the events are unplanned, and we hear about them either through Community Members or through second party information, but we have not had any incidents. As you all know, there are still many very alarming protests happening around the country, but thankfully, we havent had that come to our city here lately. We will continue to monitor and facilitate peaceful protests and keep the commission updated on how thats going. There was an unplanned march in the taraval district, had about 60 to 70 people. It was in the area of sloat and great highway, and the people were peaceful as they marched up great highway. We had one unit basically trailing the group, closing off intersections in front of the group so they could facilitate the march, and it was peaceful, and that is the highlights for this week. With that, i will open it up to the commission for questions if there are any questions. Vice president taylor thank you. Commissioner elias . Commissioner elias thank you, chief. Im glad that the incident training is going to be displayed at the International Police chief meeting because i had a lot of people comment to me on the critical mindset training, so im hoping that you can discuss what the training entails because i think the fact that its already had such positive responses from Community Members will be helpful. Thank you. Be happy to do that, commissioner. Thank you. Vice president taylor thats a great idea. Im going to calendar that for a future meeting. Commissioner brookter . Commissioner brookter yeah, and thanks again, chief, for acknowledging what i brought up in the last meeting. But i do want to make sure, from what i was hearing, it sounds like ingleside, tenderloin, the bayview, and mission, homicide was up, and thats a problem. Thats a problem. So i want to make sure that as we do these reportouts, and were looking at the data, and were looking at the information thats in front of us, that we are looking at a plan to make reductions in these areas and have the staff that we need in order to see a decrease in these areas. I think that was extremely, extremely alarming. Were looking at a 100 increase in ingleside, so i wanted to make sure we pointed that out and make sure thats on our radar, chief, and were planning how were going to see a decrease in homicides in the city. Yes, sir. I may have spoke, but the shootings are whats up in inglesides, which is just as problematic. Commissioner brookter no, point well taken. Vice president taylor commissioner brookter actually stole my thought because, you know, when we look at this, it just says yeartodate incidents. It is bayview, mission, ingleside, and tenderloin pretty much where the black and brown people live. So what im going to do for a future meeting, chief, and i told you this would be coming up, but kind of more pressing now, what is the department doing in terms of the bayview. When i look at everything is down but the four areas where minorities tend to live, these incidents, i just want to know what the department is doing to reach out to the community thats clearly struggling here, so im going to ask you to present on that at a future meeting, chief. Thank you for that, Vice President taylor. We will definitely put together a presentation on that. Vice president taylor thank you. Commissioner dejesus . Commissioner dejesus so chief, im looking at the data that you gave from 2016, 70 pointing guns down to 44 . Thats good. Thats a 26 reduction, but i guess for the public to understand, the pointing of the begun, gun, is it still pointed at black and african americans, besides the training, what else can we do to bring it down because its still quite high, i mean, close to 50 . Yes, commissioner. It has been reduced in terms of the first of all, let me back up. Youre correct. Theres still disparities in that particular demographic, and definitely, its less of a disparity than it was four years ago, but we still have work to do on that. So part of this, with training as the cncr and other training that were doing is helping greatly in that regard, but we still do have some work to do movement on that issue. And you look at the trainings over the last three, four years, the number has been reduced, and the biggest demographic as far as the pointing of guns have been african americans. So that number has been reduced significantly, as well. However, its still disproportionate, and that is a concern, and its something that were continuing to work on. But this training definitely helps, and that in conjunction, some of the work that were doing, particularly in the area of bias and the work that the department has recently revised we think will all lead to Better Outcomes. A lot of work to be done, but i think were putting the pieces in place to make that situation better. Vice president taylor thank you. Commissioner elias . Commissioner elias i think its important to note, too, and maybe the chief can speak to that, the use of force numbers are going to be drastically different from this point forward given the use of force bulletin that we just passed a few weeks ago because the new bulletin is going to require officers to account for any time a weapon is pointing someone, including those that dont result in hospitalization or an actual shooting, so the numbers are going to be very coming in the forthcoming months and years, so i think thats something that we should also consider, as well. Vice president taylor yeah. I think we should expect a decrease in use of force Going Forward. Yes. Just to your comment, commissioner elias, how we track, just like we did when we introduced resolution on use of force, we hope to capture that in use of force policy, use of force on those overcoming resistance, so if we set it up right, well be able to track those captured by this policy and be able to track what the changes are. Just like with use of firearms. We know how many pointing of a gun use of forces there are, so we can kind of compare apples to apples in the use of force. That has to do with the tracking, and putting together the right mechanism as we roll this thing out. Vice president taylor thanks. Commissioner cohen . Commissioner cohen chief, i wonder if you can give me some insight, whats the plan to deal with outside groups that come into San Francisco with the view of disrupting Peaceful Demonstrations . A lot of it, commissioner, is about getting ahead of it. We track a lot of that information, and a lot of it is posted online. We kind of get a feel its not a perfect science, not anything near a perfect science, but we get an idea. Also, some of whats being said online gives you an indication. A lot of what we saw online was a lot of violent talk, saying they were going to come in and do certain things. We saw trends around us, and sure enough, those trends were in our city. The more information we have, the better prepared we are. Now when we get a situation where we have a small group thats trying to create a situation or incite a violent situation, our plan is to deal with the group effectively as a whole. Oftentimes, we can isolate, if you understand who it is thats causing violence or causing disruption turning into violence, and isolate on that group and not take it out on the whole group and end up having to deal with 1,000 people when its only ten that are violent. Commissioner cohen so it sounds like youre surveying and gathering intelligence so youre able to pinpoint yes, thank you. Thats exactly what were trying to do. Weve been able to do that so far, and had some good outcomes. Weve spent a lot of time talking about what the appropriate thing to do is. So so far, we havent had a lot to deal with in our city so that Peaceful Protesters can get out and do what they need to do. Commissioner cohen thank you. Vice president taylor commissioner hamasaki . Commissioner hamasaki chief cohen, to follow up on commissioner cohens question, theres been a lot of surveilling and monitoring protesters and Peaceful Demonstrations. What procedures do you have in place to ensure that your surveillance of political demonstrators isnt inpinging on First Amendment activity . Who is your Department Monitoring . Are they monitoring protest groups that want to speak out against black lives matter . Is that something that theyre monitoring . We monitor online, open Source Information to know whats happening in the city. But surveillance on those groups or any group thats planning a protest, thats not something that we do. And there is policies and protocols and county ordinances on that. The board of supervisors right now is going to go through coit the city office of Information Technology is creating data under the ordinance. We are working with coit to get our policies before them, but we monitor open Source Information. We always will do that so we know whats out there and whats coming. If there is a protest thats unplanned, spontaneous, we will monitor that in terms of actually having officers either in the area or helping to facilitate or something in the area. There is very thoughtful processes to make sure that we avail peaceful protests and we allow them to exercise their First Amendment rights in that sense. Commissioner hamasaki all right. Well, i think this came up last week. There was a release of documents relating to surveillance at pride and at the fourth of july. We went through this at the last meeting, as well. I think theres some other surveillance activities, and ill ask to schedule that meeting because there is a bigger item than what we should be covering in the chiefs report. Thank you. Absolutely. We want the publics confidence that were doing the right thing. So we definitely welcome that, and again, working through this whole process with Surveillance Technology and what were going through. We welcome that. Vice president taylor thank you. Next item, chief. Thank you. Next item, we actually have commander correa reporting on our safe streets for all report. Good afternoon, Vice President taylor, commissioners, members of the d. P. A. , members of the public. Sergeant youngblood, am i coming through loud and clear. Vice president taylor yes, thank you, commander. Okay. Appreciate that. My name is commander correa, and i am the commander of the special Operations Bureau of the Police Department. Tonight, im here to make a presentation for safe streets for all, our Second Quarter yeartodate update. And the next slide, please, sergeant. So our goals and efforts in our safe streets for all program, to continue to support vision zero, to continue to patrol citywide uniformed officers from our district stations and motorcycle officers. Conduct investigation on area thats have been identified throughout the city as highinjury corridors, collaborate with other agencies and our district stations, participate in Community Meetings and educate the public. Down below, we have vision zero and some of our partners, including San Francisco department of public health, d. P. H. , sfmta, which is the San Francisco municipal transit authority, walk sf, which is a group for safe pedestrians and travel throughout our city and other coalitions. Sergeant, if you could go to the next slide, please. Thank you. We have a twitter account where we try to get out information to the public about operations that we conduct with our Traffic Company. Our name or our tag on twitter or handle is sfpdtrafficsafety, and what we have here are slides or screen captures from our twitter account which display a number of Traffic Safety operations that weve conducted in the last year, Second Quarter of this year, along the high injury corridors which include the taraval, police district, ingleside, and Bayview Police districts. Next slide, please, sergeant. Thank you. In addition to those districts, weve been in the central, the southern, and the Northern Police districts, which are our top two slides. They are our top two photos. Beneath, on the lower left corner and the lower right corner, the program that we were involved with in connection with getting information out to the communities during the citys response and Community Response to covid, there were several Community Caravans that were held to raise awareness in different communities throughout the city, which include the bayview, the oceanview, l. M. I. , the southern district, the northern district, and the park police district, and the roll that the Traffic Company officers played on motorcycles with facilitating the caravan. Sergeant, if you wican go to t next slide, please. So this slide, this graph depicts our Traffic Violation by our individual units, ten district stations and Traffic Company. 11 reported reports out for the period of january through june 2020. Our Department Wide totals, 9,520 Traffic Violations. 2,124 nonTraffic Violations, and our focus on the five violations, 5,211. The percentages in parentheses there indicated we were to report all our citations, were at an average of 55 . The Police Departments commitment to vision zero was to meet 50 of all of our citations, so for the through First Six Months of this year, our average is 55 . Sergeant, if you can go to the next slide, please. This slide depicts our focus on the five violations percentage by each of the ten district stations and our Traffic Company. The red line was our yeartodate for 2019. The blue line indicates our yeartodate for this year, and in all but i believe two instances, our percentages have increased for focus on the five violations. The reason for members of the public, who may not be aware at the moment, the reason that we are focusing on the five violations, its been identified as a primary collision factor in serious injury and fatal collisions in the city and county of San Francisco. Our goal is to Issue Citations and hold and make traffic stops for these violations in the hopes of both changing the behavior and raising Public Awareness in the belief that if we can reduce the instances where these violations occur, we can have an impact on the number of serious injury and fatal collisions. Sergeant, the next slide, please. So we have two graphs here, two pie graphs. The first indicates these are for traffic fatalities. Unfortunately, they occurred between january 1 and june 30 of this year. The information relayed there is the type of or method of transportation of an individual who died as a result of a collision, so you can see we have for passengers and exterior passengers, we have two individuals. One person on a bicycle, four people walking under the category of pedestrians, three people on motorcycles and two who were driving a vehicle. As a note, the passenger category, where i said exterior passenger, earlier in the year, we had a passenger riding on a coupling between two vehicles on muni, and that person fell off while muni was making a turn and suffered and died from their injuries. This also displays the ages of victims of each individual category. Sergeant, next slide, please. So this depicts our traffic fatalities from january to june of this year. All the blue lines that you see on this map are areas that have been identified through vision zero stating or research in the downtown network. Youll see in the eastern part of the city, the tenderloin, almost every street is on High Injury Network corridor. The points on this map indicate individuals who died in a collision. If you look at a location, for example, crossover drive and m. L. K. , as well as the method of transportation motorcyclist, bicyclist, people walking, pedestrians. In some cases, a determination has been made to the actions that precipitated the collision, and those are noted, as well. Sergeant, if you could go to the next slide, please. This depicts our fatalities, comparing the same period in 2019 to this First Six Months of this year period for 2020. Pedestrians, we had a change of 64 . Motorcyclists, we have an increase of 200 . We had one the same period of 2019 and three this year. Minus, a cut in half percentage of 50 for drivers killed in collisions. And then passengers and persons using bicycles were the same for 2019 and 2020. Sergeant, if you could go to the next slide, please. And thats the information that ive prepared for this presentation. Thank you for your time, commissioners, and i want to ask if anybody has any questions that i can answer. Vice president taylor thank you. I dont see any names oh, commissioner hamasaki is waiving his hand. And youre muted. Commissioner hamasaki sorry. I feel like i just wrote it in the chat. Vice president taylor i dont see it any ways. Commissioner hamasaki hang on. Im having a little bit of problem. Can you hear me . Vice president taylor yeah. Yes. Commissioner hamasaki okay. Thats weird. You can hear me . Vice president taylor yes. Commissioner hamasaki okay. Its showing my microphone as muted. Commander pereia, just a question. I appreciate these interactions. We all want our pedestrians and bicyclists and everyone to be safer. Do you have any data to support that these Enforcement Actions in the high injury, high accident corridors are effective . Meaning, are you seeing a decrease in collision, decrease in injury accidents following the enforcement action or is it more just, like, theoretical, that hopefully if we do this, that this gets the message out . Being okay. Thank you for your question, commissioner. Ill try to answer it as best i can. Part of our strategy, we want to raise awareness. Whether its officers just being present in the area in high injury corridors, or traffic stops, or whether that results in a traffic citation or advisement, all of that helps to raise awareness. All of these areas that we are focusing our attention on identified by the vision zero s. F. Committee working out of sfmta, the department of public health, and we get also get ive had a lot of strong input and feedback from walk sf and the Bicycle Coalition in terms of their desire for us to be in these areas to help prevent fatalities. Hard numbers, i dont have at this point. I dont have any data that i can point to specifically that say things change by the presence of collisions or [inaudible]. Commissioner hamasaki right. I guess im trying to be thoughtful about the use maybe its because budget season is stretched, and weve heard a lot of issues raised about use of resources, and we want to be sure that the resources that were using are being used effectively. So if there is a way and maybe this is something that we can think about to track the data to show that these programs are impactful, that would probably be helpful to present down the line and be able to demonstrate with data as opposed to anecdotal effectiveness. Yes, sir. Vice president taylor okay. I dont see any other questions, so wican we call th next item on the chiefs report agenda . Thank you, Vice President taylor. Deputy chief [inaudible] will present our findings and recommendations. Okay. Good evening Vice President taylor, commissioners, chief scott, chief of staff hawkins, and administrators. My name is [inaudible] and ill be presenting to you the fdrb findings and recommendations to the board. Next slide, please, sergeant youngblood, and then, the next slide, please. So tonight, commissioners, i will be presenting the summary of o. I. S. Next slide, please. So officer involved shootings 17005 occurred september 23 of 2017 between the hours of 2335 to 0330 the following morning. The location of this occurrence, this officer involved shooting was in the [inaudible] block of salmon and [inaudible] in the city of San Francisco, september 23 of 2017 approximately 2335 hours, officers responded to the area. Officered attempted to persuade the suspect to surrender. The host age Negotiation Team established communications with the suspect via telephone. During the negotiations, two separate single gunshots were heard coming from inside the residence. After the incident, the suspect indicated he had shot his wife in the head. The team initiated a tactical rescue. The officers made their way into the room and contacted the suspect. The suspect had a gun in his lefthand and was ordered to show his hands. The suspect did not comply and moved toward the officers in an aggressive manner, lunging up from a seated position. Two officers simultaneously discharged their departmentissued rifles. The suspect was struck and taken into custody. Aid was rendered, and the suspect was transferred to San Francisco general, where he later died. The hostages were rescued, and there were no other injuries. The recommendation to the chief of police was that the use of firearms in this incident was in policy, and chief scott concurs. Next slide, please. Officer involved shooting 18003 occurred on march 21, 2018 at approximately 1629 hours, at 949 geneva avenue. San Francisco Police uniformed patrol and plainclothes offers responded to 229 amazon avenue to investigate a 911 call regarding an i imagine in front of the residence with a gun. As officered were responding, dispatch advised that the suspect had flashed a gun and tried to break into the residence. Officers onscene were directed by dispatch and a resident as the suspect was now at the amazon barber shop, located at 949 geneva. Officers observed an individual inside the barber shop who matched the description of the suspect broadcast by dispatch just minutes earlier. As officers entered the barber shop, the suspect opened fire at the officers. The two officers drew their firearms and returned fire at the suspect. One officer and the suspect were struck by gun fire. The officer and suspect were transported to San Francisco general for the injuries. The suspect was pronounced deceased at the hospital. The recommendation to chief scott for this incident was that the use of the firearms by these officers were in policy, and chief scott concurs. Next slide, please. The next is an officerinvolved discharge 00119, occurred july 31, 2019, approximately 1542 hours, cero magnum and market streets. Officered were flagged down by an anonymous person stating that there was an aggressive dog in the shopping center. The dogs owner was not present. Officers requested animal care and control to respond to the scene with the animal grohling and being aggressive. The animal ran and lunged at one of the officers. The officer sidestepped and drew his weapon and fired one time at the dog, striking it. Animal care and control responded and took care and custody of the dog. Next slide, please. The following are still open o. I. S. Cases, and they list the status active and still pending criminal investigations. And then, the last slide, sergeant youngblood, thats the presentation for this evening. Vice president taylor thank you. Can you give us a sense of why you think it takes to long the first case that you talked about was from three years ago, september 2017, and i noticed some open items as early as from january 2017, so just educate us and the public, what the process is and why these things take so long to go through the review board. Its a Vice President taylor, its a combination of whether the theres going to be a criminal charge to the d. A. S office, the length and time it takes to review the criminal charges or criminal investigation, the administrative investigations, and any other investigations performed by any other entity, including the d. A. S office. [please stand by] i dont know if were ready for the Vice President. Next line item. Next line item dpa directors report. Report on recent activities and announcements. The descriptions of dpa activities and announcements. It will be limited and any of the these issues raised inaudible . Good evening members of the viewing public and chief scott. Ill start tonight with an overview of our statistics to date we have opened 549 cases compared to 495 this time last year and we have closed 595 cases and in compare ton to 430 cases this year. We have 392 cases pending as opposed to 367 at this point last year. We have sustained 39 cases and currently we have cases pass the 2780 day mark. We have 34 of those cases down from 38 at this point last year and the reason they are passed the 270 day mark are because officers are out on disability pay or because theyre told for other reasons including on going criminal or civil litigation. Or criminal investigations. Currently, we are at 30 cases mediated to date as compared to 26 last year. As we will recall a new stat that commissioner ally as asked for was the number of cases we have pending and number of caseses we have pending with the commission. Currently, we have 14 cases that are pending with the commission and the oldest was filed with the commission in april of 2019 and there are two other cases currently pending with the commission filed in 2019 and there are 10 cases pending with the commission from 2020. One of those is an appeal and one actually, as i believe commissioner thomas mentioned earlier tonight, its set second hearing tomorrow. In terms of cases pending with the chief, we have 32 currently. I did get a request for commissioner alliance in an attempt to on exactly what stage each of those 32 cases is in. I have been working with sfpd and corresponding with ac moeser and with one of the sfpd lawyers. I would rather, if its ok with the commission, present those pum stats next week and one of the issues istats and they havey officer names so i have an updated list with the officer names and were working on that. At the next presentation well be able to give an accurate report and a fair report of the status of those cases. Thank you. inaudible . Better. Speak really closely. Its also my understanding that that information will be more readily available because the dpa and the department are having conversations to streamline documents exchange between the two agencies to ensure it will be exchanged and dpa will provide those reports. That is correct. We are on track to work on automating or more seamlessly sharing the information and in the meantime, were still struggling with the manual data pools but we will be able to achieve those goals for the commission and for the public. One request was an update on the investigation and what i can say is that dpa opened two cases related to the death of public defender jeff adachi. One of those investigations was regarding the leak of the incident report related to that death. That investigation is open and on going. The second investigation was with regards to search warrants that were issued in San Francisco Police Departments investigations of the leak. That investigation has been completed with dpa and its currently involved in the process outlined in the city charter for what happens when a dpa and given confidentiality rules cents th, its the updatet investigation but i did want to share that information and with the public as well. Thank you, go ahead. Go ahead. So, i also wanted to share some information about the upcoming release of the reporting on use of force audits. The dpa and the controller staff met with a number of people from sfpd command staff with 37 recommendations and sfpd has a month to respond to those so we had a discussion yesterday, sfpd will file a written response by september 25th and well have that report filed by september 30th and are hoping that well be able to agenized that before the commission pending your schedule but hopefully and week remote we do virtual outreach on august 24th, dpa hosted a virtual session on oversight and sb1421. On august 28th, we held a dpa101 session where one of our attorneys, Stephanie Wilson gave a presentation about San Francisco civilian oversight and the rights afford today seville comincivilians. We have two interns this fall. Im sure you will hear from them at a future date. We also have another virtual dpa101 on friday september 11th and on thursday, september 15th, we are hosting a talk called Police Reform and Community Involvement and happy to report any questions that you have. Thank you. inaudible . Next line item. Commissioner will be limit today activities and announcements. Commissioner session will be limited raised for future Commission Meeting. Commission president s report, commissioners report and commissioner announcements and schedule items identified for consideration at future Commission Meetings. Anyone else hearing feedback. Maybe we can have folks mute themselves and maybe it will help. So commissioner, do you have our report for the commission . Sorry, i thought it was two agenized an item, sorry. I see no reports to the commission so maybe we can move on to the next item. So at this time we need to take Public Comment. Before Public Comment, i think commissioner alias has something she wants to agenized and i have something as well. Thats what i meant. The next item under this we went through the commissioners report and its time for the commissioners to say what they would like to act for future meetings. So commissioner, ill ask you. Id like to agenized dgo5. 3 and have that come up before the commission. Weve put it off and i think its time that we bring it back and see what we can do about it and see where we are since we already passed 517 and they were lumped together. Yeah, sorry. I agree. We had a consensus from the working Group Commissioner and changes and they were trying to work through that since then and i hope we can have a product that is ready to go and chief, id like for you to report. Yes, commissioner. Thank you. Next line item, please. So commissioner. Thats what i left it in the chat route hitting return. Chief, i not chief, as far as agenizing items, there was a couple of items that i raised a few months ago now that i wanted to get followup and from the chief. On the agenda. One of them was for misconduct reporting by the department by officers and theres selfreporting or reporting of other officers and theres always been a concern about the blue code or thin blueline and you dont inform or rat on your fellow officers. And so, we discussed having a Quarterly Report about obviously about whether or not in fact sfpd officers are willing to report misconduct when it occurs in their presence as they are obligated to do so thats one item and chief,oid like you to,o be prepared to followup with that and get it on the agenda. We talked about when we came back was the use, if any, of noknock warrants. This came up relating to the discussion of grandma taylor and i had asked the condition or procedures underway the department does execute noknock warrants and i wanted to get a report to the commission on that to ensure that we have the highest standards to protect human life during those if there are to be the use of those type of warrants and and thats the second item. Thank you, well add those and make sure theyre added to future agendas. I see no other hands in the check so please call the next line item. At this time the public is welcome to make Public Comment online item 2 regarding reports to the commission. Members that would like to make Public Comment, start now to raise your hand. And at the moment, we have one comment. Good evening, caller, you have two minutes. Is this Public Comment . Yes. You have two minutes regarding line item 2. Is it Public Comment for all . For line item 2, reports to the commission. Ok. Im not sure. Is it general Public Comment . No, this is the chiefs report, dpa report and the commissioner reports. Ok. The chiefs report. So this is public grounds. Hi, how are you. Good, how are you . Im getting out of this noise coming from my phone. Im calling concerning my son ab rewhaubry who was murdered in 26 and im still seeking justice for my son and he was shot, i met with the police with my investigator today and michael, you know, just try to get some information and i was just glad that i was able to meet with them today. You know, even with all of that i still just wondering what is going on and how were going to go forward about getting my childs case solved. Like i was saying, i also run a service for mothers and fathers who lost their service and healing and im considering the cold case and unsolved homicides and i was wondering what we can can do and if you can do a blast out concerning my son. We had the media blackout age and i was glad everyone supported me and who was able to come out on the 14th for the Media Coverage and the circle for the other mothers and fathers out there. Again, im just calling to ask you to do another blast out concerning my son who was murdered august 14th, 2006. Thank you. Glad to hear from you but you know, i want to intrigue members of the public if you have any information and please call the non tip line and 415575444 and ms. Brown is here every Commission Meeting asking for justice for her son so if you have any information call that tip line. Thank you. Commissioner, that was the last Public Comment online item 2. Thank you. Next line item. Discussion to adopt the manual discussion and possible action. We have com panderer darrell fong who will make this presentation. Commander fong. Thank you, chief. Good evening Vice President taylor commissioners, welcome commissioner cohen and chief hawkins and chief scott and members of the community. My name is daryl fong com commar of the Community Engagement position, i will present an overview on the embassador program. Its comprised of civilian non sworn members who serve to supplement foot patrol business within business and commercial corridors. The goal of the program is to bridge the gap through partnerships with the distance improvement districts to provide inkeysed visibility in an effort to reduce crime. The Union Square Area has been identified as the area for implementation of a Pilot Program for the Departments Community embassadors with the uni square Business Improvement district. The goal is to implement this city wide and the Programs Mission is to provide enhanced safety for the community in retail and commercial corridors for visitors, merchants and residents. To serve between the department and Community Benefits and Business Improvement districts and reduce crime and assist in province stopping by using working partnerships with city departments and within the community. The community embassador staff consist of 10 embassadors, which are committed to working 20 hours a week and 960 hours for fiscal year and their proposition at the city charter amendment. The program is facilitated by the department the primary focus is to observe and report. Reporting response of the Department Personnel for any crime in progress and contacting 911 and cellphones and this quality utilizing fell services are resources and collaborate ing Community Partners within the Community Policing and province solving effort and demonstrating mind set. Building relationships with merchants in businesses to discuss and resolve reported issues and to distribute cards for engagement, sfpd safety, park smart, Homeless Outreach resource and San Francisco Safety Awareness for everyone to educate the community on resource available in hand safety and strengthen partnerships. The product cal for the embassador checking in with a signed district station platoon commander attending lineup for current district issues foray wareness and communicating with the district officer that discusses area issues and and contacting the district sergeant for administrative issues the district supervisors responsibilities involve monitoring conducting and administrative investigations such as on duty injuries, allegations of misconduct involving our community master. The training for embassadors consist of first aid and cpa and crisis i think soar selection escalation training and time and distance in deescalation and overview of the homeless and healthy streets Operation Center as known as a collaborative of city agency task with assisting with reported encampment issues. Training puts a buy as and procedural justice which focuses on the four tenants of procedure justice of voice neutrally and on 21st and the focus on two pillars. Building trust and legitimacy and Community Policing and crime reduction. Members are signed a jacket with a community sfpd community embassador logo on the back and embassador logo on the front of baseball cash and as well as the canadian embassadors would be wearing as part of their uniform. Within the department, the community embassador program is a sign within the Community Engagement division. And over seen bit embassador Program Coordinator and non sworn civilians who is responsibilities include assignment, training inspection and scheduling of embassadors. To summarize the embassador program and manual highlights include, establishing duties and responsibilities of the community embassadors and defining the embassadors role as civilian non sworn members and clarified that they do not possess Law Enforcement authority and that they are not authorized to use force in their positions. Training standards include implicit bias, principle policing as well as working knowledge that the six politifact pillarpillarslisted y policing. Theres no guarantee or expectation of employment hours as the employment will continue at the program would be reviewed for budgeting on an annual basis. In discussion with the department of police accountability, the complaint process will also be updated on the Department Website to inform the public that any complaints involving embassadors would follow the department civilian complaints process as outlined under the department general order 2. 05 apron approval of this meeting. That concludes my presentation. Im open to any questions at this time. I have questions about this but my fellow commissioners might get to them. Thank you. This is not a question but a request or recommendation. In reviewing the presentation as well as dpas recommendation about the program, one of the things that id like to point your attention to was r2 which is the recommendation that even though the embassadors are not allowed to use force, i still think its official to have a mechanism in place to a count for that in the event that it does happen. Because, you know, i believe that we are moving towards a more datadriven system of collecting data and analysis of it and i think that its not fair to require Police Officers to be able toll record their uses of force and be held accountability to that and yet were not requiring that from embassadors, even though they arent supposed to be using force. I still think we should have a mechanism to track that. Thank you, commissioner. I know that i think the response of the dpa at the time was the embassadors as a non sworn capacity are not authorized to use force because they dont fall at 830 of the personal code which authorization peace officers to use force. Certainly there is a process that we try to also outline in the ambassador manual that should there be allegations of misconduct involving such as use in force, theres a clear process in terms of an investigative process or reporting process to followup on the allegation. I wanted to make sure they go through a chain of command or sworn officers so i think we would need to sworn officers to also be able to report and provide that information just as we would expect them to do so for sworn officers. Thank you. I think this is going to be a theme moving forward but im going to be asking questions about budgeting and costs of programs like than this. You just mentioned the annual budgeting for this. Can you tell us what that is . As far as the annual budgeted for this program, commissioner . Yes. Well, i dont have the figure front of me and the Program Costs or employees 10 embassadors part of this community and that is the framework that as i mentioned and they are allotted 960 hours under the charter under prop f and i dont have that in front of me but its 10 embassadors working an average of 20 hours a week which is a maximum of 960 hours per the school year. And what is the hourly cost per ambassador . I dont have that available but im happy to look at that and get back to you. Were not talking about officers salaries for this work is i guess what im trying to get to. Its the rate of a q2 without the french benefits and just on the budgeting, when we first began implementation or planning for implementation we did request in the 2019 budget to get this program started with the we were never able to use the money and this manual was supposed to get to the many months ago and we already had chosen the retirees and trained them and we used a budget to do that and for this coming year, we have not asked for additional money and we have to manage it through our existing budget and its like were doing it the proper employees for other components of the Police Department had h we had to get the manual approved before we can do anything and we didnt asked for money for this fiscal year because of the issues with the condition of the city but we do think think will be a viable program and we have a non arm response to deal with some of the issues is that we face. And then my final question on that program, is how you are the embassadors selected what kind of screening process do they go through. Obviously, if theyre going to be in such a public capacity, the former officers are retired officers, are we reviewing their disciplinary and personnel files to ensure that these arent had our use of force. Thats a great question. One other criteria, this is to scott, commissioners. The people that were selected all had a lot of experience with positive Community Engagement. This is Community Engagement and the people who have been on the department established a solid work history and work reputation and knowing how to deescalate those type of things, even before that became a thing. Those are the type of employees when they are on the department. Most retired by the time i got here but, it outstanding and understanding really the departments mission and the positive Community Contact out there and deal with issues without escalating so those are the type of people that we thought to seek out for this position and from everything that i know about the people that showed an interest, there are those people. Like joe garrity who really was designed to put the program when he was statement in the den per loin district and carl payne, who you all might know carl payne. He worked for muni for a number of years before coming over to the Police Department but Just Community oriented officer when he was in the department so those are the type of individuals that we sought out. Thank you. Commissioner cohen. Thank you. I actually had my question asked about how the persons were selected. Now my followup question to that was, the how is the location for the Pilot Program selected . And then my second question is, are the community embassadors bilingual . Are there a few that speak other languages other than english . Ill start with that last question. I believe so but as the commander to verify that but with the selection of the location, it was designed to be a pilot and the reason that we started off in union square is because of the infrastructure that union square provides and they have a very robust bid with private security and many of the businesses there and they have an infrastructure with cameras and with the sfpd to try to prevent type of issues and the Union Square Area so it was really that combination of those things and we wanted to have a chance of success with an eye forward hopefully if it takes off the third steed and those things went into play in terms of our decision to start there and a small enough union square we with can pilot it and hopefully with a chance of success. I have a couple of questions, these are all retired Police Officers. Yes, commissioner. I know they dont have a department assigned where these are all people who carry firearms . They will not be permitted to carry firearms during these assignments at all. Regarding the use of force, they know theyre not supposed to use force but obviously if you are a retired officer, youve had training on uses of the force and the recent training on the use of force so give us a sense of what theyre told and how the message is drummed if that theyre theyre training and experience should not make come into play in this role . Absolutely. The training theyve gone through portions or abbreviated crisis and most of them have retired and its really started to roll out it was around when they were here so theyve gone through that training and theyve gone through training on the dos and donts and the rules are including as commander fung said that they were no longer peace officers and they are not authorized to use force, period. That is part of the training and everybody who agrees to take it understands that and theyre willing theyre not out there to use force. Theyre out there to be ambassa, eyes and ears. Give directions and put a good face on and also, they know the linger and they know when to call on to resources when things go beyond what theyre called to do and they have that training and they know the radio goods and its a good fit. I attend part of the training myself to greet them when we started the training its spelled out clearly what they can and what they cant do. My last question has to do a the attire. I saw the vest and pants. Its not in San Francisco but there have been not in San Francisco but terrible examples of programs run by Police Departments where you have civilians who the public or children stated Police Officers. Right, so, i know that the sfpd community embassador but maybe its worth putting Something Like non Law Enforcement because you can think of terrible examples and someone thinks of Law Enforcement and bad things can happen and so its just something to consider the first line i saw was sfpd. Thank you for that. And just a little bit more context on some of the models that we looked at when we were creating this the university of Southern California has an Ambassador Program that is a robust program. They call the yellow shirts and they supplement the basically they focus on corners around campus and get directions and make students get to and from safely and that type of thing and we took a good look at that model when we were dividing this and actually talked to the chief down there and the person running their Ambassador Program. Really like that program, its not meant to be a Law Enforcement response. Its not meant to be that at all and we will stress that ticken into account what you said about the public maybe being confused they see sfpd on the shirts. Well take that into consideration and we can make adjustments there. Again, it is a part of the Police Department. I understand what you are saying. I just want to ensure the commission and the public this is not meant to be, you know, a Law Enforcement tactic or theyre not meant to use force, make Law Enforcement tactical decisions. This is a report and call us if it gets what you are called to do. Call the on duty resource . Commissioner cohen. Vice president taylor, i could adjust two things. To address the acknowledgment of the ambassadors, at the last page of the manual, the ambassadors signed acknowledgment of what their role and responsibilities are and it clearly states there are acting as a non form member and do not possess Law Enforcement powers or use force. Its reinforced there and they sign an acknowledgment as such. To commissioner cohens question regarding our embassadors, we do not have bilingual embassadors to to the chiefs point they have a wealth of experience based on a wealth avenue signments that they side of when they were in a sworn capacity. Perfect, thank you and i appreciate that. That was my followup question and i wasnt sure if i missed the answer. Chief, this program actually, im excited about it. I think this is a good Pilot Program and i hope that it will be successful. You know, i think were all involved in Public Service otherwise you wouldnt spend our time here in the evening on wednesdays on a weekly basis. So i can see retired officers coming back and wanting to serve. That seems logical to me. I would like to know what kind of benchmarks do you have in place to determine whether or not the Pilot Program is going to be successful, how are we going to evaluate this and then im also thinking about the future. Scalability . How do we begin to move n this into different neighborhoods, chief, you talked a little bit about key things that you looked for when selecting a neighborhood, right. The infrastructure and in terms of a Camera Network and merchants, neighbors, some level of organizations that you can kind of come back in and sound like augment or not augment but maybe just something that is complimentary. How do we do this . I want to know, so, we all are in agreement. This is successful and we go to the budget process and we try to get funding. What are those established benchmarks, thank you. Really good question and so first of all, one of the things is to measure the whatever the crime in the area. I mean, particularly if there is crimes happening. Robberies, purse snatches, even some of the velour leve lower l. People urinating on the streets that are qualityoflife issue. Whether theyre embassadors or o private security or Police Officers, we can curtain that activity. Some of it is tracking statistics saying what is happening on the streets. The other part of it though is really, an eye test, is being out there Walking Around and you can feel when things go better. And a lot of our an and i knw its subjective to that degree but its a valid way of determining how you are doing when you walk around a neighborhood and you do see the things that drive people to call the police and say things have to change here. So, the eye test is one and statistics is the other and surveying and evaluating from the Community Members were partnering with. The union square bid was a big partner in this in terms of working with them to ensure they supported this and theyre willing to work on this and they are and theyll tell us how were doing. Theyll tell us if its working or not working and there are a lot of, as you know, commissioner cohen, a lot of willing Community Partners that we just have to put a model out there where we can work with them in the best and most effective ways so all those things in total will give us a sense of whether or not were successful and really were looking forward to decreasing crime and a decrease in activities that causes and generates calls for service and particularly the relationship when you see someone that needs help, to get in front of that before its a crisis where someone is either getting hurt or hurting themselves. Those are the things that were asking and well track those things and track the number of engage and the calls and all but were looking for results. Thats the bottom line. Result and Better Outcomes and better feel. You know when an area feels safe based on the activities happening there and definitely the crime stats are part of what we monitor. Thank you. Commissioner alias. Thank you, chief. I wanted to give you an opportunity because i think you were going to Say Something with request to mregard to in thought used to be using it. Thank you. Thats are really an easy fix. If we have a use of force we can track that and report back on that and that is really its not supposed to happen but if we do it wont be counted as department use of forces i just want to make that distinction but definitely something we can track. Thats fine. As long as its tracked and we have the data available, thats fine. The other suggestion i wanted to make to you was perhaps we can also include the critical find set training in their training program. I see they received the cit training which is great. Even though its the eighthour versus the 40hour. If we incorporate the critical mind set, which also highlights deescalation, that would be beneficial too. We can do that. Thank you. I just wanted to followup om thinking about it, some of the questions that have been asked so when, say an ambassador is walking down the street and sees someone run out of a retail store with some goods, toothpaste, whatever. What do they do . In that situation, they would be the best witness that they can be understanding license plate numbers if theyre there or description of the suspect. Theyre going to have radios. Make it a broadcast and calling the on duty resources and we have supplement them and a lot of the businesses hire private security and some hire officers through uniform officers off duty. Really their role would be to report. If theyre trained observers by trade. Good information will allow us to followup because often times, if some of these cases were able to solve them on the back end when we get the right information and write down license plate numbers and description and with the video instruct we request video and these cases tend to come together. That type of role is what theyll be doing. Ok. And so just a followup to one of the previous questions. It sounds like this is not, from everything you are saying, its not a Law Enforcement role so potentially if it was a non Law Enforcement individual who wanted to apply for this, with that be possible . That would be possible. We started with the prop s and 960s because we have a pool of people that we can draw from. Were open to we cant hire them as 960s so they would have to actually be a more thorough budgetary process to create a position and actually hire them in some other capacity. Definitely something that were open to, if this pilot is successful. Its something were open to. Thank you. Thank you, chief. Commander, you have a comment. Do you want to be heard . No, i apologize. I believe sergeant kinly who oversees our Community Ambassador program was trying to raise his hand for some comments but i just thought if he just contacted me we could discuss what the concern was. Sorry about that. I apologize. With that, do i have a motion to adopt the Community Ambassador program . So moved. Do i have a second . Second. Do we need Public Comments . At this time, the public is welcome to make a Public Comment regarding line item 3, the Community Ambassador program. Those who wish to make Public Comment please press star 3 now. Commissioner, we might have two question marks. Im going to open them to see if they are raising their hands. Ok. Good evening, caller, you have two minutes. Do you have a comment . Good evening, caller, you have two minutes, would you like to make a comment . There is no Public Comment. All call roll for the vote. On the motion to adopt the Community Ambassador program [ roll call vote ] [ roll call vote ] i think were adapting the Program Manual but, yes. Presentation of the sfpd and general orders policy proposal sparks report. Second quarter 2020 discussion. Executive director mcgwire, i think you are on mute. I still cant hear you. It looks like were having technical issues and this might be a good time to take a fiveminute break. So well be back in five minutes and hopefully those will be resolved. Sorry about the delay. Good evening, Vice President taylor and members of the commission, welcome commissioner and chief scott and chiefofstaff hawkins and members of the public. Im catherine mcgwire, im the executive director of the Strategic Management bureau and ill present the Second Quarter report for the sparks report. Great. [please stand by] so as you can see, the duties of patrol officers, [inaudible] the serious Incident Review Board has a working group in process, and the Field Training program also has d. G. O. Is under revision, so [inaudible] excuse me. Sorry. Siri is talking to me. Siri decided that serious Incident Review Board was siri, and she was talking to me. The Field Training program is under revision right now. We did do some work with d. P. A. On that d. G. O. And came to agreement with the subject Matter Experts in a couple of sparks meetings, so we feel that weve made Good Progress on that d. G. O. , and then finally, as you know, the 3. 09 and 5. 03 are scheduled for future Commission Meetings. And arrest by provide persons, arrests of on will lookers, ar by officers are all under revision, and these are all in the final stages of drafting, so theyll be going to concurrence soon, and then, you all are very aware that the deaf and hard of hearing d. G. O. Has been confirmed. The Domestic Violence d. G. O. And the manual has passed concurrence and are now back to d. P. A. For final look, and then they will be coming to the commission very soon. And then finally, property processing and victims of Violent Crime are in the final stages of revision or are about to go to commission. People in custody and children of arrested persons are in process. The hostage and barricaded suspects are in revision right now. The hostage and barricaded suspect was merely to confirm. And then finally, the investigation of officerinvolved shootings and discharges is complete and has a working group process, and that is in the final drifting stages, and then, intervention and Resource Program is also under revision, in the final stages of that revision. Thats my update for you, and if you have any questions, im happy to answer to them. Vice president taylor yeah. I just want to confirm, 5. 03 is not in commission. Thats what commissioner elias and i were talking about before. Yeah, commissioners. Would you like me to update this presentation and send it back to the public the public documentation . Vice president taylor sure. I just wanted to make sure that the public was aware of that because thats not the case, and then, ill move onto other commissioners. But i do have one other question. You mentioned that there was a working group. Im sorry. For which . The serious Incident Review Board, 3. 10. So as you know, the department has identified at the chiefs end and at the time president hirsch had identified certain d. G. O. S for working Group Processes that then we also developed and the chief and Chiefs Office developed a working Group Guidance for the department on how to assemble those works groups, and so this is independent of the c. R. I. Executive sponsor working groups. We can bring you all a little bit more information on that in a few tour presentation. Vice president taylor i didnt realize that there was a working group. Im sure that therell be commissioners who would want to be commissioner elias im just confused because im actually assigned to this Vice President taylor yeah, thats what i thought. Commissioner elias so the fact that theres a working group is news to me and alarming. So when we say a working group is in progress, its been assigned for a working group. Commissioner elias okay. And that progress is underway. Vice president taylor right, but is there a commission if there is a commissioner assigned to that, thats something i should be made aware of. Yes. Commissioner elias, you are assigned. We are reviewing the draft, but its not quite ready for you, so we want to make sure that we give you a product thats further along, but i think we are close to having something to bring you. Commissioner elias and im glad to hear you. When i spoke to tamara, that was one of the issues as far as i knew, when i spoke with her, she hadnt received that yet, so i think thats definitely something we need to keep on the radar and get a Progress Report on. Yeah, sure. Vice president taylor and commissioner elias will probably cut me off, but i want to be clear, on these presentations, i dont want the public to have the wrong impression of whats happening here. When they say a working group, its not that a working group has been convened so that the public is not thinking that theres things happening that have not been happening. Commissioner elias, do you have anything else . Commissioner elias no, just what you addressed, and then, i cut you off, also. Vice president taylor commissioner hamasaki . Youre muted. Commissioner hamasaki yeah, so i guess i have a different question, but i think everybody kind of keyed right in on it. You know, the policies for the department are in the jurisdiction of the Police Commission, and so i think the earliest contact that should be made when the police are consider drafting it are the Police Commission because were going to want to have a say or should have a way in who makes up the working group, obviously. I have this issue coming up on the 7. 01 working group, which was, you know, i think put together with a lack of subject matter expertise, and i was able to bring in people that had expertise in juvenile law and criminal law. So i would strongly urge, if you want this to be a collaborative approach, to bring the Police Commission in. And ultimately, if youre going to be doing this work behind the scenes, and then were going to have to come back and start from scratch again, i dont think thats very productive, and i dont think it shows the proper collaborative attitude towards the process. So if you are approaching d. G. O. S, and you are considering revising them, i would consider them or encourage you to contact the Commission Office and let us know so that we can determine amongst ourselves who are the appropriate commissioners who oversee the process. Because one of us ultimately has to come out and be able to work on it and explain it to the other commissioners why its gone through the commission process. Vice president taylor commissioner dejesus . Youre muted. Commissioner dejesus so i see the d. G. O. That commissioner mazzucco was working on, 1. 08, and last i heard, it was going to the d. P. A. So are we getting it back from the d. P. A. To talk about it . Like, exactly where it is in the process . Vice president taylor im trying to figure out where 1. 08 and i actually have a phone call scheduled with former commissioner mazzucco tomorrow, because youre right. He was the one working on it, and theres no one on the board thats currently part of that process. Commissioner dejesus what i recall, it was a slightly detailed eight, ten pages, it was a slightly detailed d. G. O. And i just want to make sure that if were going to be voting on it, that the public has the opportunity to review it. I dont know if its on for next week, if thats enough time. Vice president taylor no, its not on next week. Im talking to commissioner mazzucco, about who the stakeholders were to present it to the commission, exactly as you said. Did i hear you on that one correctly, commissioner, 1. 08. Vice president taylor yes, 1. 08. Yes, that d. G. O. Had a tremendous amount of Community Input. I know that i had asked for an extension so i could actually have deputy chief lozar who was heading that before he got promoted, there was a lot of Community Input and process on that. So its about ready to go. Whatever questions we can ask to get it on the agenda, were more than happy to answer those questions. Vice president taylor yes. But theres a lot of people involved, and i just want to make sure that the commissioners understand who was involved. I have a conversation with commissioner mazzucco tomorrow, and i hope to have it on the schedule in two weeks, depending on how many people were involved and the stakeholders, actually. Commissioner dejesus okay. So i have another question. 5. 16, search warrants. Im under the understanding that this is the working group, and this isnt the group that commissioner hirsch and i were trying to put together for search warrants or is it . Search warrants for doctors or for the privileged type of information . So im just wondering, would that groups be encompassed in 5. 16 or is 5. 16 something separate . Commissioner, its separate. Youre correct. Its the actual 5. 16 revisions, and you were on the wosh group when we attempted to get a work group together on the other part. I gave you a draft on the skill part and other part that we were working on. I think i gave one to commissioner taylor, as well. Vice president taylor yeah, i was supposed to be on that working group, as well, and im not sure what became of it. Commissioner dejesus yeah, i dont remember the status. Yeah. The decision was made either by president hirsch or somebody in the commission to separate the two, and so thats why we had a separate draft of the piece about the shield laws and all that thats really ready for feedback. And then 5. 16 needs some revision, too, because theres some things that we worked with on the district attorneys office, policy, to make sure we abide by the rules. Vice president taylor so when you say revision. [inaudible] commissioner dejesus yeah, it must have gotten lost in covid because i dont recall seeing any draft. If you could send it to me aga again. Vice president taylor im sorry, chief. That must be my bad, but if you could give it to us again, that would be great. Sure. Vice president taylor commissioner hamasaki . Youre muted. Commissioner hamasaki thank you. I think were all a little bit confused tonight. What might be helpful, a way to manage this so everybodys on the same plate is if the department can confer with the Commission Office d. G. O. By d. G. O. And make sure whoever is the representative is connected to that, and if theres no representative, we can look at it and assign commissioners just to make sure that we know whats going on in the area thats in our citymandated duties or charter mandated duties, so that would be super helpful. Vice president taylor [inaudible] for myself or commissioner dejesus, so that would be very helpful. Am. We will put some processes in place. Were going off of the schedule that the commission passed, the d. G. O. Schedule, so as youll recall, but we can put a reminder there to make sure we have it. Commissioner dejesus yeah, but that list was created by commissioner hirsch, so we it was sent without our input, so i think we you know, commissioner hamasakis suggestion is correct, that we should have the Department Contact the Commission Office and go through whats coming up. Sure. Vice president taylor okay. Commissioner dejesus wait. I also recall that we were setting up members for the First Amendment rights and others the Bar Association to go over this with us, and then covid hit, and i dont remember what happened to the working group we were trying to put together. So when you say revisions, i assume you mean the departments making revisions, and we dont have the Bar Association or the Public Defenders Office or anybody else on the working committee. Vice president taylor yeah. I think what the chief is saying they send a first draft to us, after which the working group will convene. That was on my plate. Im going to ask the chief to rescind it, and then, we can go from there. Commissioner dejesus okay. Thank you. Vice president taylor okay. Is that it for sparks . I believe so. [inaudible]. Vice president taylor oh, director hawkins. Just a couple of comments from d. P. H. On 1. 08, it was sent back with d. P. A. On 1. 08, it was sent back with our comments. Now just the general sparks report, i dont have any slides. Im going to highlight a few of the things that we filed. In the Second Quarter, we made multiple recommendations regarding sfpd policies, some related to the d. G. O. Revision process itself, and some were specific recommendations with regard to particular d. G. O. S. Of interest is 6. 14, which is the psychological evaluation of adults. That d. G. O. Is from 1994. One of the key things that we recommended is that the policy incorporates provisions that enable, in appropriate cases, for a Mental Health response instead of a police response. Obviously, thats something thats being discussed locally and nationally, and thats a recommendation that we made. Similarly a similarly old d. G. O. 5. 07, we recommend that policy incorporate First Amendment rights to protection, an individuals right to record, question, and observe the police. Another thing recommended was that sfpd create a disengagement policy which would outline and give the opportunity for officers to know when it was appropriate to disengage from a situation, take a minute, and potentially reengage in a different way as best suits Law Enforcement needs and Public Safety principles. So those are some of the highlights of the recommendations that we made. Over the Second Quarter, we made recommendations on 15 d. G. O. S. In total, over 150 recommendations were made. Obviously, were working through Department Standards and following the sparks process to make sure that our revisions are being made and getting discussed at marsparks meetings and with spubt Matter Experts. I think one example where the process worked well was with the police force d. G. O. I feel like that was a really productive process, and the result is much stronger for it. [inaudible] is that different than time and distance conceptually, and can you explain what that is . Yeah. Time and distance, i think of and im not the expert as a delay. This is a situation where we no longer necessarily need a Law Enforcement response, so how do we kind of exri indicacate our from this situation and call in another professional or another type of responder, so its a slightly different time and distance from our perspective. Vice president taylor okay. [inaudible]. Commissioner hamasaki did you just call me . Vice president taylor yeah. I think you might be the cause of the feedback, so if you could mute yourself. Commissioner hamasaki thank you for explaining that, miss hawkins. I would just encourage, if there are additional groups that d. P. A. Is involved in i know this isnt your necessarily your responsibility, but i feel like theres been this hole created with samra leaving. And i dont this isnt anybodys fault, but, like, im getting as good information as where policy stands, so, you know, if theres and i dont know quite where to loop us in, but just if theres a a better way from d. P. A. Side to ensure that were involved because again, these policies are ultimately going to come before us, and were going to have to work through d. P. A. And all the working group commitments. Thats a wonderful policy, and i think we could work with Bill Morehouse and Tessa Mcguire on the d. G. O. S and where they are in the process. Commissioner hamasaki thank you. That would be great. Vice president taylor thank you. Next line item. Clerk at this time, the public is now welcome to make comment online item 4 regarding the presentation of the sparks report. Any member of the public would like to make Public Comment, please press star, three now. Commissioner, there is no Public Comment. Vice president taylor okay. Next line item. Clerk line item 5, general Public Comment. At this time, the public is now welcome to address the commission for up to two minutes on items that do not appear on tonights agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Police Commission. Under public rules of conduct Neither Police or d. P. A. Personnel nor commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. Members of the public wishing to call in may do so by calling 14156550001 and enter meeting code 1461408360. Press pound, and pound again, and press star, three to enter the queue to make Public Comment. Anyone would like to make Public Comment regarding general Public Comment, please press star, three now. Vice president taylor do we have any Public Comment . Clerk no, commissioner, we do not. Vice president taylor okay. Next line item. Clerk line item 6, Public Comment on all matters pertaining to item 8 below, closed session, including Public Comment on item 7, vote on whether to hold 8 in closed session. Anyone wishing to make Public Comment on items 7 or 8, please press star, three now. And there is no Public Comment. Vice president taylor okay. Next line item. Clerk okay. Vote on whether to hold item 8 in closed session, San Francisco administrative code section 67. 10, action. Vice president taylor do i have a motion . Commissioner hamasaki so moved. Commissioner cohen second. Clerk okay. On the motion to hold item 8 in closed session, we n [roll call] clerk commissioner, you have six Vice President taylor do we need to have Public Comment . Clerk item 9, vote to elect whether to disclose any or all discussion on item 8 held in closed session, Public Comment. There is no Public Comment. Vice president taylor okay. Roll call vote. Clerk on the vote to elect whether to disclose any or all discussion on item 8 held in closed session [roll call] clerk president taylor, you have six yeses. Vice president taylor next line item. Clerk line item 10, adjournment. Vice president taylor can i get a motion . Commissioner hamasaki motion. Second. Vice president taylor roll call vote. [roll call] clerk you have six yeses. Vice president taylor have a wonderful night, everyone. Welcome, commissioner cohen. Commissioner hamasaki welcome. Commissioner brookter congratulations, malia. Dont get used to this
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.