Transcripts For SFGTV BOS Budget And Finance Committee 20240713

Presently present. Public comment is available for each item. They are streaming the number across the stream at sfgovtv. Each speaker is allowed two minutes. Comments to speak during the Public Comment period are available via phone by calling 888 2045984 access code 3501008. 3501008 press pound. You will beelined up in the order you dialed. While waiting the phone will be silent. All callers will remain on mute until the line is open. You must account for timely days between life coverag cover coved streaming. Turndown your radio. You can make Public Comment by emailing me linda. Wong at sfgovtv. If you submit via email it will be included as part of the matter. Written comments may be sent through your Postal Service to city hall. Finally, items acted upon today will be forwarded for full consideration on may 12 unless otherwise stated. Supervisor fewer thank you, madam clerk. Please read items one and two together on the budget and finance committee agenda. 1. Resolution authorizing the director of property to exercise lease amends for leases of Real Property at 3119 Mission Street and 3120 Mission Street for office and Service Space with klw investments as landlord each for fiveyear terms to commence on july 1, 2020 to expire on june 30, 2025 at the combined Monthly Base Rent of 203,231. 60 for a total annual base rent of 2438779 with base rent increasing 3 per year. Two. Resis solution authorizing the director of property to exercise an option to extend a lease of Real Property located at 2 gough street for office space with rachris, llc as landlord for fiveyear term. Call us to line up to speak. Thank you. You may remember the two items one and two were continued from last weeks agenda. We heard these last week. I believe last week we had supervisor peskin also joining us. You might recall that last week we heard these items and asked the director of real estate to go back to the landlords and ask if we could renegotiate at a lower rent. I believe you are joining us today with an update. Thats correct. Good morning, chair fewer and supervisors, i am the director of real estate. As you just stated. I was before you last week seeking positive recommendation on these leases. You asked that i go back and talk to the landlords because you were concerned that the rate that was proposed did not reflect an anticipated downturn if option in the market. I am pleased to announce we had those negotiations. The landlords are not very happy, but we were able to achieve a 15 reduction in the proposed rate for each of these leases due in large part to the willingness of the landlords to continue the partnership with the city. As it relates to 2119 and 2120 Mission Street, the current rate is 46. 75. The proposal before you last week was 48. 45 per square foot. The new proposed rate is 41. 18. I would note in this case, the new proposed rate is below the current rate and represents an almost 20 reduction. 2 gough street it is 39. 40 per square feet. New rate today is 44. 78. This concludes my presentation. I am available to answer any questions that you may have as well as robert walsh from hsa. Do you estimate the total cost savings is over the time of this rent, how much we are safing total . I do not have that figure in front of me. I believe in the resolution it gives the annual rate, but it doesnt give the annual savings. I would be happy to get that to you. That would be great. Any comments or questions or congratulations and our appreciation . Supervisor mandelman. I want to extend congratulations for taking this back to the lessor for willingness to have this conversation. It is a weird moment to enter a lease extension. That was correct last week and i think this is clearly an improved result to the city, allows the space to be used for important City Services and also recognizes the fact that there has been this economic downturn. These coffers will be strained Going Forward. Thank you. Seeing no other comments. Could we have Public Comment on items one or two, please. Operations is checking to see if there are any callers in the queue. If you have not done so press one and 0 to be added to the queue. Madam chair, no callers are wishing to speak. Public comment is closed. I just want to say thank you for negotiating on behalf of the citizens of San Francisco. I would like to mention as budget chair i would accept before we are looking for any extension of leases that there would be a conversation about reduction in rent so we know we are in economic downturns. Thank you so much. I appreciate it very, very much. I would like to make a motion. If supervisor peskin is listening, thank you very much. I would like to move to the full board with a positive recommendation. Could we please have a roll call vote. Thank you. Due to the new rates, i want to ask if the resolution is to be amended . Yes, could we have the City Attorney weigh in, please. Good morning, chair, members of the committee. I expect the resolution would require amendments to reflect new terms of the lease. I have not been sent amendments. To the extent be they would reduce the amount of the money the city is approving they wouldnt be substantive. As suggested by the clerk i would expect the resolution approving the leases would have revisions to reflect changed terms. Would we be able to vote today or have to wait for the amendments . Madam chair, we did provide red lines and clean versions of the amended resolutions to the clerk. If those are available and you want to continue this item to later in todays meeting, i think we would have a chance to look at them so the committee would vote today if they are available for review. Okay. Madam clerk, have you been able to find that legislation . Yes, madam chair. My apologies. We do have the amended legislation. I will forward it to the members of the Budget Committee now. We can take item 3 and come back. Would you please send a copy to the City Attorney. Lets go to item 3, madam clerk, please read. Resolution approving modification number 14 to airport contract for the San Francisco International Airport Terminal One Development program with t1 to increase by 6 million for a new not to exceed amount of 38 million for services and extending the term through july 7, 2023 to commence following board approval. Members who wish to comment on this item should call us at 8882045984. Press one and zero to line up to speak. Thank you. We have cathy wagner from the San Francisco International Airport. Good morning. Cathy wagner from the San Francisco International Airport. The item before you would approve modification to an existing project Management Support Services contract with t1 partners for the airports t1 program boarding area b project. The modification increases the contract by 6 million for a new total contract amount of 38 million and extending the contract through july 7, 2023. The original contract was the result of a 2013 competitive request for proposals and was approved by the board for the current 32 million not to exceed amount. T1 partners provides Program Management services to the terminal milk project including Program Planning and Program Costs and schedule controls, cord nation of Program Management with Construction Management and other program services. The original Contract Term was one year with nine one year options to extend. The airport previously exercised six of the nine oneyear extension options through july 2020 within the originally approved 32 Million Contract amount. This proposed modification would increase the final three one year options to extend. The second phase of the t1 program opened last week with nine gates in boarding area b as well as south side tickets lobby. While the airport has reevaluated Capital Improvement andy layed projects based on the covid19 crisis. The harvey milk project is a priority and will continue as scheduled. The airport has 1 billion of capital im provement Funding Authority and we have adjusted so this will blast for 18 months with the hope that it goes through a recovery period. The budget analyst has reviewed this modification and recommends approval. I would be happy to answer any questions you might have. Thank you. Could we hear from the bla, please. Good morning. Budget legislative Analyst Office. This approves the 14th amendment to the existing contract between the airport and t1 partners to provide Program Management services to harvey milk terminal renovation project. This would be approving the final three one year extensions of the contract. It was a 10 Year Contract to 2023 and increasing amount by 6 million from 32 million to 38 million. We summarize the 6 million increase in the contract on page 15 of our report. We also did have discussions with the airport about the cost of the contract, cost of the project and funding sources. There are some Revenue Bonds that would pay for the final part of this project which would cover the cost of the contract, also, as you look on page 16 of the report we do note there is cares act funding and passenger facility fee Funds Available to the airport to meet the revenue shortfall at the airport which is estimated at 200 million in the current fiscal year. Because the program is ongoing and this has been a performing contract that we do recommend approval of the resolution. Thank you very much. I see in the queue supervisor walton. Thank you. I have one question in terms of with the decrease in revenue for the airport, does this have any effect . Do we continue to monitor this . Just to clarify. Do you need to continue to monitor the capital plan or this contract specifically . Capital plan, this contract specifically, i know this wont be the last similar request we have. I am wondering with decrease in revenue how does that affect item three, and quite frankly Going Forward items that are going to be similar . This contract will be the final modification. This 6 million will closeout this contract for terminal 2 project. You will see some ongoing Capital Project items coming before you. As i said that entire project has been reevaluated with some projects delayed or removed so we can make our existing 1 billion authority in Capital Spending last for 18 months. I would be happy to get you some updated information on what projects we will be moving forward with andy laying if and what projects we will delay if that is helpful. Thank you very much. I will provide that to the committee. I have to say the airport did not reach out to us about this before. I didnt have an opportunity be to voice kernels. I am concerned about this contract. The airport is going to be in a slump more than 18 months. You have the buffer. We dont know how the economy l bounce back. We know if you need funds that most of the time happens that there are layoffs of workers. Actually, i think i would like to see that information before we actually have a vote on this. I would like to open this for comment and make a motion to continue this item into the next meeting of the budget and finance committee. Can you please call for Public Comment. Operation is checking to see if there are callers in the queue. Please let us know if there are callers ready please be added to the queue. Madam chair, no callers are wishing to speak. Thank you. Public comment is closed. Ms. Wagner, i would like to learn a little bit more about how the airport is going to meet the shortfall. I would extend a shortfall to even after 18 months. We are looking into the next two or three fiscal years to get an understanding, deeper understanding how you are going to meet these shortfalls because airports have been hit very hard and also the airline as. We dont know which airlines will recover financially. I dont have any idea on what your plans are. If you could provide some information to us that would be great. Supervisor mandelman. I want to make sure there is no client sensitivity acting on this rather than next week. No, that is fine. I would like to make a motion to continue this item to the next budget and finance committee and could i please have a roll call vote. On the motion supervisor walton. Aye. Supervisor mandelman. Aye. Supervisor fewer. Aye. Three ayes. Item four ordinance amending ordinance 17019 the annual salary ordinance fys 20192020 and 2020221 to add active military Service Related to the covid19 pandemic to the enumerated events that qualify for supplementary military pay. Supervisor stefani, i think you are the speaker today. Thank you. Good morning. Before you today is a minor amendment to the annual salary ordinance which i have put forth to make sure everyone who responds to covid19 is adequately compensated. The annual ordinance provides the city to pay employees on military leave the difference between the city salary and military pay. The city pays the retirement contribution while on leave and other benefits to about which they are entitle if it is over 30days. This only applies to terrorist attacks. These do not apply to unit training or similar events. My amendment expands to include members of the military called into active duty for covid19 response authorized by the federal government in march. This came to me after i heard from two individuals who are currently served in this capacity with diminished pay and benefits. They are doing the work, most vital in our country right now. I dont believe it is right they suffer additional Financial Hardship for doing so. As the budget and legislative analyst pointed out this will cost approximately 55,000 for employee deployed. San francisco has a very low number of individuals deployed. I have identified only two individuals in San Francisco. There may be others. We know only about 1,000 people actually meet this definition statewide which is only. 2 of one percent or two people per 100,000. This will have a tremendous impact on the lives of the individual families but small impact on the county. I want to thank those who drafted this so quickly. Thank you for your consideration. Members of the committee, supervisor stefani. In response to what is presented this would amend the annual salary ordinance for 19202021 for those called up for military pay. Based on information provided by the department of Human Resources we estimate the cost for individual 55,000. This is generally paid out of existing City Department budgets, not an additional budgeted cost to the city. The number is not known at this time how many San Francisco employees would be eligible, however, as supervisor stefani pointed out based on data from the state legislative analyst only about 1,000 individuals have been called upstate wide as of early april. We consider approval a policy matter for the board of supervisors. Any comments or questions . I am sorry. I am on by phone. Hi, supervisor yee. Do you have a question or comment . Yes. I know that in talking abou ther day when the numbers that San Francisco had that were deployed, i think they were saying 2018, 2019, somewhere around there were out of the whole year there were 23 deployed from San Francisco. I dont know what the number states on there, but right now they have deployed about 1,000. Is that the same ratio you are seeing for those whole year deployment in which a small number of San Francisco residents were involved . I think 23 or something. The two that supervisor stephanie seemed reasonable in terms of the sort of the ratio San Francisco versus california . That is a question. Is that a question for supervisor stefani, is that correct or the bla . Bla. Reasonable percentage. 1,000 deployed so far for the pandemic. Supervisor stefani said possibly two versus some concrete data we have for the Previous Fiscal Year in which 23 san franciscans were deployed. Yes, president yee through the chair. We did not have any kind of estimate on how many San Francisco employees would be called up and qualify. 123 that we put in the report was basically we requested information from the department of Human Resources over the past two years how many have been called up and calculated the average cost. That was 123 San Francisco employees over the past two years called up or receiving military pay in an average cost of 55,000. There is no number in terms of those who would be called up for covid19 response. What we did get is state legislative Analyst Office state wide about 1,000 were called up as of april 8th. We assume if 1,000 were called up the actual number in terms of San Francisco would not be very large based on that information. We dont have a specific estimate. So i get the number i am after is for those two years in which there were 123 deployed. How many were deployed statewide . I do not have that information. I am sorry. Do you have that information . Thank you. I am not understanding the question. My understanding was 123 were deployed for active conflict. It is not statewide or for covid19. Go ahead. Can you please repeat the question. Thank you. I am trying to get a sense of proportion of the San Francisco versus statewide. What is the typical proportion. Since we dont really know if it is 1,000, i think that is in the state right now. What we dont know are the true numbers for San Francisco. We do know the true number for San Francisco deployed over the two years for combat was 123. I thought we had the numbers for how many were deployed statewide for those two years. Then we could get some idea of proportion. You are saying two out of 1,000. It could be true, i dont know. I am trying to find out if that is close to what the proportion might be. We dont know the proportion. You dont have the number, nothing we can do. Okay. Thank you very much. Lets open this up for Public Comment. Are there any members of the public to comment on item four . It is breaking up. There are no callers in the queue. They have to fill it out on their timecard. We would follow up. Okay. Madam clerk, is there something wrong with my speaker . Then i would like to make a motion to move with a positive motion to the floor. Roll call, please. On the motion. Supervisor walton. Aye. Supervisor mandelman. Aye. Fewer. Aye. Three. Ayes. Can i ask to see if they can get how many in california were deployed over those two years. So i have a better sense on this at the full committee, full board. We will provide that information prior to the Board Meeting next tuesday. Thank you. Thank you very much. Would it be possible to go back to items one and two before the next item which is lengthy . Back to items one and two. I have the information you asked for previously. For the Mission Street leases, the savings over fiveyear term is 1,942,000,840. For the golf street lease over the 5 year term the savings 586,215. The total savings for all three leases is a little over 2. 5 million. All right. Every dollar helps. Thank you very much. Are these amendments substanti substantive . Madam City Attorney . No, they are not. I make a motion to approve the amendment roll call vote, please. On the motion to approve the amendments for items one and two supervisor walton. Aye. Mandelman. Aye fewer. Aye. There are three eyes. I would like to make a motion to move items one and two as amended to the board with positive recommendation. Roll call vote, please. Supervisor walton. Aye. Supervisor mandelman. Aye. Chair fewer. Aye. There are three ayes. Thank you very much. Madam clerk, did you read item 5 already . Item 5. Resolution authorizing the Treasure Island Development Authority to execute a standard agreement with the California Department of housing and Community Development under the Affordable Housing Program Total award of 20 million to the department sponsor of 100 Affordable Housing project at parcel c31 and 6. 2 million to be disbursed as a grant from hcd to the authority for Public Transportation improvements on Treasure Island for the period starting on the execution date of the standard agreement to june 30, 2039. Members of the publicsual call the 8882045984 access code 3501008 and press one to line up to speak. Thank you. We have bob beck here from tie a and the San Francisco tda. Mr. Beck, are you presenting . Thank you, chair. Yes, members of the committee, bob beck. I have a half dozen slides to present, but eric of the Transportation Authority and mercy housing are also on the line if members of the committee have questions. Okay. Can you see my presentation . No, we cannot. Let me try again. As mentioned. We have an except and expands resolution for a 20 million grant award from the state department of housing and Community Development. The Affordable Housing and Sustainability Community Grant Program is administered by the Strategic Council and implemented through the department odepartment of housid Community Development and provides grants for transportation and housing and infrastructure housing to achieve Greenhouse Gas reductions and deliver community benefits. The nofa was issued by the department of housing and Community Development november of 2018, and in january of 2019, the board of supervisors approved resolution 3919 authorizing tida to apply jointly with mercy housing under the Grant Program. We filed an application in february of 2019, and hcd issued award announcements on july of 2019. The resolution before you today authorizes tida to execute the standard agreement and related documents to accept the fundin fundings. Of the funding and the application, approximately 13. 75 million is directed to mercy housing to help fund the development of our second 100 Affordable Housing project on the island in partnership with Catholic Charities. It will be 138 apartment units, 71 replacement units for existing Catholic Charities households on the island. 23 transition units helping tida fulfill the obligation to existing market rate residents on the island. Additional new 44 affordable units. It has a mix of one, two, three and four bedroom units. Our predevelopment loan was approved by mohcd in february of 2019, and their target start for construction is the First Quarter of next year. You can see the renderings of the proposed building that mercy is designing along with the architects and where it will be located on Treasure Island. The transportation elements which will be implemented through tida include funding that we will direct to the Transportation Authority for bike and ped elements within the limits of the recently awarded south gate hillcrest interchange project. Those elements will connect the east span bike path with bike and ped improvements by the master developer on mic collow road. A c transit buses will serve the islands and some funding to help support the construction of the intermodal hub improvements serving bus and ferry improvements at the front of the island. A small amount of funding for tod partnerships, 189,000 will go to mercy housing to support the purchase of transit passes for residents for the first three years of occupancy and 40,000 to go to the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition to help fund bicycle education and advocacy efforts. That concludes my presentation, but i would be happy to take any questions that you may have. Thank you very much. Colleagues, any questions . There is no bla report. Public comment first. Could we please hear Public Comment on item 5. Operations is checking to see if there are callers in the queue. If you have not done so please press one and zero to be added to the queue. For those on hold waits until you are prompted to begin at the beat. Madam chair no callers are wishing to speak. Public comment is closed. I would like to make a motion. I see no one in the queue. I would like to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. Rolling call vote. Supervisor walton. Aye. Supervisor mandelman. Aye. Chair fewer. Aye. Three ayes. Thank you very much. Madam clerk please call item one of the budget appropriations committee. Item one please review the budget process and related updates and request the Controllers Office and Mayors Office and the budget and analyst report. Members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment should call is 8882045984 access code 3501008 and press one and zero to line up to speak. Thank you very much. We have with us ashley from the mayors Budget Office and ben from the Controllers Office. Good morning, supervisors. Thank you for having me this morning. As the chair said i am ashley, deputy budget director in the mayors Budget Office to provide a brief update on spending in the citys response to covid19. I have one slide. Can everyone see that . No. Now we can. Okay. As of monday, may 4th, the city has expended im sorry. This seems to have an old number. I am not sure what happened. 68. 9 million on the covid19 response effort to date. That is a 5. 4 million increase from the prior week. Much of that increase is made up for an increase cost of ppe and additional spending on noncongregate shelter. To remind you of the big cost drivers here. The city has expended 31. 7 million in salary and benefits for staff involved in the response. This is mostly reallocation of existing budgeted staff time. The second largest category we are tracking is 19. 9 million for health response, which includes additional nurse or physician staffing, supplies such as ppe. We have spend 8. 1 on noncongregate shelter and Homeless Support Services increase from the prior week. Lastly, this other category which i will resend the slides. 9. 2 in other costs that is mostly for cost related to it or maintaining the Emergency Operations center, things like that. That is a very brief update. Our office in conjunction with the Controllers Office will provide additional detail in the coming weeks with a little bit more of projection for how the city will spend through the remainder of the fiscal year and some Additional Information on state and federal revenue. That concludes my very brief presentation. Thank you very much. Does the controller have anything for us today . Hi this is reesa from the Controllers Office. We are working with the Mayors Office within the next week or so. Thank you very much. Supervisor ronen. Yes, thank you so much. Last week you or kelly and ben had mentioned that the majority of these costs were going to be covered by federal and state reimbursement. I am wondering if that still continues to be the case as you prepare this report. We will get it next week and have the full picture. In terms of update from last week is that still the case . As part of this big report that reesa mentioned we are getting a lot of matching sources and uses so there is a lot of information out there. We are hopeful that fema will reimburse us for many of these costs and that we can fill other remainder gaps with other sources, but, like i said, we project the cost for the remainder of the year to see if fema and the money we received from the federal government to date will be sufficient. That exercise is very much happening. We will have a much fuller update for you at that time. Thank you. I think, also, that mr. Delarosa mentioned that they will submit reimbursement every two weeks. The actual number so we can get an update how much we received, how much has been approved and what they are submitting for. That would be a good thing for us to hear, also. Comments or questions, colleagues . I have a fewments few comments. For the last few weeks i have asked a standing weekly item for updates in realtime and ask questions. The next few weeks we will get significantly more information about the budget. It is my commitment to ensure that the board of supervisors is prepared to participate in the budget process. My office will send out the final updated calendar today and posting on the website. Colleagues there is room for additional hearings in the coming two months. I will work with your office to identify the top pressing budget related issues that we must prioritize as a committee. I wanted to lay out what the next few meetings of this committee will look like. Next week, may 13, we will go back to regularly scheduled 1 0d Appropriation Committee meeting. May 13th will be a presentation on the updated joint report from take mayors on an legislative age list will provide an update. May 20 the committee will hear the proposed new balancing plans to address the deficit in the current fiscal year and plan to hear the mayors budget instructions for the coming two year budget. In the month of july and june we will hold Department Hearings to inform the boards priority and how to engage in the budget process. This caused by the covid19 is rocking San Francisco, the country and the world, particularly our city. Incredible particularly for or city which has seen incredible Economic Growth consistently for several years. This is requiring us to think differently. I want to be clear. While we are facing tough decisions, San Francisco is still a city of immense wealth. In the previous worse Case Scenario posed the city will face a 1. 7 billion deficits over 2. 5 years. The San Francisco budget last year exceeded 12 billion annually. Yes, we will need to make sufficient decisions. As the city will be okay. As this pandemic pulled back the curtain on the disparities. Iit is important to protect our residents who are hurting the most. How we prioritize will be telling what kind of city we want to be. We could be a city that continues in the great inequities precovid19. I will be asking with regard to spending in the coming weeks. Some of this will come through the updated joint report that will be heard at this committee next week. The Controllers Office will compare how this compares to the two prior recessions so we have historical context. I will be also working to ensure the most transparency on the budget for departments to consider service in the coming years. I am asking the office of Racial Equity to help provide analysis of any proposed reductions in services or staffing. Colleagues will continue to be in the process in the coming weeks and months, dont hesitate to reach out to get ideas or thoughts how to spend our time as a committee moving forward. Any comments or questions, if not we will open it up for Public Comment. Can you see if there are any people in the queue to speak. Operations is checking to see if there are any callers. Please let us know if callers are ready if you have not done so please press one and zero. If you are on hold continue to wait until you are prompted to begin at the beat. Madam chair, no callers are wishing to speak. Public comment is closed. I would like to make a motion to continue to the call of the chair. Second, please. Second. From president yee. Roll call vote, please. On the motion. Supervisor walton. Aye. Mandelman. Aye. Aye. Aye. Supervisor ronen. Aye. Chair fewer. Aye. Five. Ayes. Any more business before us today . No further business. We are adjourned. Thank you. Welcome to the epic did you know that many buildings in San Francisco are not bolted to the foundation on todays episode well learn how the option to bolt our foundation in an earthquake. Hi, everybody welcome to another episode of stay safe im the director of earthquake safety in the city and county of San Francisco im joined by a friend matt. Thank you thanks for being with us were in a garage but at the el cap center south of market in San Francisco what weve done a simulated the garage to show you what it is like to make the improvements and reduce the reflexes of earthquake were looking at Foundation Bolts what do they do. The Foundation Bolts are one of the strengthening system they hold the lowest piece of wood onto the foundation that prevents the allows from sliding during an earthquake that is a bolt over the original construction and these are typically put in along the foundation to secure the house to the Foundation One of the things well show you many types of bolts lets go outside and show the vufrdz were outside the epic center in downtown San Francisco well show 3 different types of bolts we have a e poxy anchor. It is a type of anchor that is adhesive and this is a rod well embed both the awe hey that embeds it into the foundation that will flip over a big square washer so it secured the mud sell to the foundation well need to big drill luckily we have peter from the company that will help us drill the first hole. So, now we have the hole drilled ill stick the bolt in and e postoffice box it. That wouldnt be a bad idea but the dust will prevent the e postoffice box from bonding we need to clean the hole out first. So, now we have properly cleaned hole whats the next step. The next step to use e postoffice box 2 consultants that mixes this together and get them into tubes and put a notice he will into the hole and put the e postoffice box slowly and have a hole with e postoffice box. Now it is important to worm or remember when you bolt our own foundation you have to go to 9 department of building inspection and get a permit before you start what should we look at next what i did next bolt. A couple of anchors that expand and we can try to next that will take a hole that hole is drilled slightly larger marathon the anchor size for the e postoffice box to flow around the anchor and at expansion is going into the hole the same dinning room well switch tamet so, now we have the second hole drilled what next. This is the anchor and this one has hard and Steel Threads that cuts their way into the concrete it is a ti ton anchor with the same large square so similar this didnt require e postoffice box. Thats correct you dont needed for the e postoffice box to adhere overnight it will stick more easily. And so, now it is good to go is that it. Thats it. The third anchor is a universal Foundation Plate when you dont have room above our foundation to drill from the top. So, now we have our Foundation Plate and the tightened screw a couple of ways to take care of a foundation whats the best. The best one depends on what your house is like and our contractors experience theyre sometimes considered the cadillac anchor and triplely instead of not witting for the e postoffice box this is essentially to use when you dont have the overhead for the foundation it really depends on the contractor and engineering what they prefer. Talking to a qualified good afternoon and welcome to the may 5th, 2020 regular meeting of the San Francisco board of supervisors and i want to wish everybody a happy cinco de mio. Madam clerk, please call the roll. role call