Statement of our agencys values and it determines how we use our very, very limited resources in order to uphold the public good. Public transportation plays a Critical Role in the unfolding of this Health Crisis and in the unfolding of what will be likely a long economic crisis. Our job is to figure out how to steward our declining resources in order to therefore the services that essential workers need to have to get to work and in order to poise San Francisco for recovery, thats what were here for. Everything we do, whether its muni, parking is connected with the health and safety of budget of San Francisco. I want to introduce my colleague, victoria wise, who will facilitate this meeting. Do you want to go over what were doing today. Thank you, jeff. Good morning, everybody and almost afternoon. While we cant meet inperson were grateful you are joining us today online and really appreciate that you are taking the time to provide input on our budget. Its especially important that we have public input and continue to have public input as we move our budget through the approval process. So, just a couple of logistical issues and housekeeping kind of stuff. This conversation is being broadcast live on our website, on our twitter page at sfmta underscore muni. On our Facebook Page and youtube channel. And all the links are posted on our website at sfmta. Com budget. The way things will go, for this conversation, were going to get to watch at 13minute pre recorded video where jeff shares with you some of the challenges that we face in our budget and talks about what some of our proposals are taking a deeper dive no some of the issues that weve heard frankly quite a lot about like our muni fares. Now, i want to tell you that this video is pre recorded three weeks ago before we had the Health Crisis that were having now a lifetime ago. It feels like a lifetime ago, in deed. Of course, needless to say, our agencys financial circumstances have changed significantly since that time. Nevertheless, the video is still relevant because it talks about some of the challenges the agency is facing and some of our priorities and so, we will play that video for you and it will be informative to the discussion and to some of the questions that we hope to get to you in the rest of the hour. Speaking of questions, i wanted to share with you that there are different ways that you can interact with us. First of all, leave us au revoir mala voicemail or tweet us. And if you can, please hashtag that with sfmtas budget. Definitely please send us an email and leave a comment on youtube or Facebook Page. All those channels are being monitored and jeff and i will be seeing your questions and taking them and hopefully answering as many of them as we can and as time allows. I want to share with you that if you wanted to submit questions in chinese or spanish, feel free to do that. We have translators standing by. So they will translate the questions for jeff and i. We cant quite answer them in chinese or spanish but staff will be providing you answers in followup after this conversation. So, again, thank you for joining us and without further adieu, if we can view the video, that would be great. Welcome to the sfmta online budget open house. To provide your input or ask a question about the key transportation decisions to be made for fiscal years 20212022, please email sfmtabudgte sfmta. Com call 415646222 or tweet at sfmta muni. [ speaking Foreign Language ] [ speaking Foreign Language ] [ speaking Foreign Language ] [ speaking Foreign Language ] im jeff tumlin. Our agency is working on our next twoyear budget, which is the yo ultimate reflex of our values. Running a safe, equitable Transportation System, reducing our Carbon Footprint and creating a welcoming workplace with excellence service. The goals are important were making progress on operationalizing the values but i also want to acknowledge that were coming up short on several key issues. These include street safety, muni reliabilit reliability and. We will address these issues in our next twoyear budget but we have tough choices to make. We recognize that were in an extraordinary time without question, it will impact our budget outcomes. We must continue to plan and discuss the trade offs that we want to see reflected in the budget we passed within the next month. Im going inform go over the details of the budget. If you want to see this content clearly or in another language, you can see it at sfmta. Com budget. We need to get back to basics. I ride transit in my bike everyday in San Francisco and i see these issues daily. Especially i experience the most common frustration that muni is unreliable. Muni service covers the city and is scheduled to run frequently it doesnt always show up when we expect. Now that ive been on the job almost 100 days, i am seeing the roots of these problems. It includes the fact that we have a thousand Job Vacancies which means less Transit Service on the street to meet current demands, traffic fatalities are not decreasing fast enough and effect our most vulnerable populations the most. Auto speeds have declined 20 over the last decade and while our investments and transit have helped some lines, our buses and trains have slowed by about 6 . I believe because of all these things, were seeing a decline in our most efficient modes and an increase in driving. All of this means that few are people can move through our streets and grown house gas emissions continue to grow. We also have challenges with our budget. Our costs, like yours, rise with the cost of living but our revenues have not kept pace. Our costs reflect the need to pay our workforce a living wage, which is particularly challenging given the housing shortage. As a result, as our budget grows, so does our structural deficit. In the next fiscal year, were projected to have an operating gap of 66 million. We will need to close that gap in order to have a balanced budget. A lot of our revenue comes from transit fares and parking and traffic fees and fines. A significant portion, 35 , comes from the general fund. Over time, we have become more and more dependent on the citys general fund. Which ties service to the state of the economy. The agency structural funding deficit and the need for on going sources of funds is not new. In the last five years, there have been multiple task forces that have identified significant funding gaps in our Transportation System moving into the future. Together, were going to need to solve for that because our city has been growing and expected to continue to grow adding 73,000 Housing Units and 275,000 new jobs in the next 20 years and increasing the number of daily trips by 36 to almost 6 million in 2050. Before we talk about the future and striving for higher standard of service, i need to focus on the nuts and bolts that keep San Francisco running more reliably. The proposed budget reflects this by making Strategic Investments into the existing system as a down payment for the future while being fiscally part during these uncertain Economic Times. Last year the city neighborhood the muni reLiability Working Group. A team of experts and Transit Service who detailed where muni must invest to deliver the service they promised. They districted us to stabilize the Current Service and develop and fund plans for growth to move towards a higher standard. This budget focuses on stabilizing the Current Service and this means, firstly, fixing our Human Resources department and getting more drivers on the road. Second, increasing maintenance staff and car cleaners. Third, increasing enforcement to keep transit and traffic flowing and fourth investing in reducing fatalities. These are strategic and critical investments to set the foundation for the future. That means implementing the rest of the muni row Liability Working Group recommendations like increasing service by 6. 5 and a variety of initiatives. Making improvements based on the Muni Service Equity strategy but ill be honest, these will require new on going Revenue Streams. Its that simple. Before we can talk about additional funding for transportation, you might be wondering can we deliver on our existing proposals . While this agency has had its struggles, we are at a turning point because we can demonstrate where weve invested we have seen results. Where weve made target investments in transit, weve seen ridership grow by 60 . Where weve made safety Em Improvements weve had reduced injuries to zero. Our plan is to continue delivering the kind of projects that have shown results that are reflected in our capital plan. As you know, the streets quickbuild projects have been wildly successful, just look at our success in market street. Following that success we have implement transit quickville projects and we have others in the works to improve transit, do state of good repair and implement vision zero. Were grateful to the voters for passing drop d to fund quick build projects and signal Hardware Upgrades like new and more visible traffic lights. In this current budget were proposing onetime funds for vision zero education which is important in order to capitalized on the vision zero Construction Projects but to make a meaningful longterm change, well need sustained revenue for non capital vision zero work. Now lets talk about fares. We know this is so important to so many of you. We have a current policy called indexing where fares go up and small amounts index to inflation and to the cost of living every year and in order to avoid huge sporadic increases. As a regular part of the budgeting process, we would have simply indexed all of our fares up at the same percentage. But, based on community feedback, particularly around the goal of equity, weve developed a number of new fares that requires some trade offs. All of these fares scenarios need to be what we called revenueneutral. They cannot increase the budget gap, i talks about earlier, or force us to make Transit Service cuts. So thats where the trade offs come in. I know this slide is complicated so let me walk you through it. The gray box are todays fares. The blue box is what would happen under our existing indexing policy where all fares increase by a percentage. The green and pink boxes show two different equity scenarios that result in free muni for all youth and there are full fare single riders are low income and 65 are minority. 37 of our single riders are low income and 66 are minority but to fund these equity options requires trade offs. In the green box were paying through an increase in monthly passes at a rate higher an indexing but matches other urban transit agencies. In the pink box, were paying through eliminating most of the discount to clipper users. People who use clipper would pay almost the same fare as those paying in cash. Our customers feedback about equity included a call for free muni, not just for youth but for all transit riders. While the desire for that is not understandable, it will actually make our system less equitable and this sounds counter innu innutive, they constitute 20 of our budget. If we do not collect fares well eliminate 20 of our service with less service on our streets and more crowding, people that can afford it might switch to other modes like driving or taking uber or lyft. Individuals who rely on muni and dont have access to alternatives will be stuck with transit that is much worse. Lets talk about fines. Fine adjustments are guided by our safety values. Behavior that is unsafe should carry a higher penalty than nuisances. Certain safetyrelated violations were increased to the maximum amount allowed by state law. Parking in a bike lane is going up 14 . Riding a scooter on a sidewalk is going up by 39 . In addition to adjusting fines were responding to widespread requests by increasing office and they can help manage and improved transit reliable to intersections and making sure cars arent blocking blocking the transit vehicles. Lets talk about parking demands. It used to ensure availability and manage demand not to maximize revenue but any revenue collected from parking goes back into the Transportation System specifically to fund transit. Our policies state if theres high demand during a certain time period, we should raise prices to ensure one or two spaces are available when you want to go to your favorite restaurant or store. When demand is low, we lower parking meter prices. We recently looked at our parking policies and realized they were little outdated when it comes to evening metering and sunday metering. We know that the demand for parking in many commercial corridors is high in the evenings. Thats why were proposing extending the time that meeters are enforced to ensure that evening visitors can still find a space where they need one. We wont do this city wide or immediately. Wore going to partner with local merchants associations to determine where the hours make the most sense and see how it works. Were also proposing enforcing parking meeters on sundays where we follow a similar community and datadriven process to make sure it works for our residents, visitors and faith communities. So, back to the big budget picture. In order to stabilize Current Service, and make the critical investments to set the foundation for the future. We are proposing tim implement e working groups recommendations. Along with other targeted investments. However, as i mentioned at the beginning, we have a structural deficit. A funding gap. In order to pay for these targeted investments, we will need to use some of our fund balance. A onetime source of money. This approach carries with it some amount of risk because it draws down our fund balance and in a recession, new Services Without new on going revenues or a fund balance would lead to service cuts. Mormore over we have economic ts as a result of the coronavirus. But, we are at a moment in time where not making these Strategic Investments would be a missed opportunity. Because they are a down payment on the future of our Transportation System and they support our values of a safe and equitable system. A reduction of our Carbon Footprint and creating a workculture with excellent customer service. It is up to all of us to get to the reliable and equitable system we need. For us at mta this means making the system we have better and showing you that with specific measurable improvements proposed in this budget. Your travel will be easier and more reliable. And now i invite you to jin me fojoin mefor a discussion of ou. We have opened up the phone lines and monitoring all of our social media channels. Please, share your comments and questions with us. Thank you. Welcome back, everybody. Thank you for joining us and i want to take this time to a apologize for the delay that we had in starting this chat about our budget. We ran about 15 minutes late. So our sincere apologies as we worked out some technical difficulties and got our arms around how to hold these public engagements in virtual reality. So again, our apologies and thank you for sticking with us during the delay. We will be extending, of course, how much time we spent with all of you by 15 minutes to make sure we have a full hour to cover all of your questions. So with that, i want to begin by saying clearly, jeff, the reality has completely changed for our budget in the last three weeks as a result of the pandemic. Our sources of revenue, whether its our fares or from our parking operations, are completely depleted and disappeared and we actually are not sure when well see them come back. So, given our current reality that were facing, what is the agency doing about it . Yeah, so this is the thing that keeps me up late at night every night trying to figure out how we get through the ways in which the Health Crisis is turning into an unprecedented financial crisis for our agency . In addition to the Revenue Sources that we control, which fund the bulk of our budget, the citys general fund is also taking a huge hit. Hotel taxes are down nearly to zero, retail sales are down significantly, business transfer taxes. So we know the city is in for tough Economic Times and we are doing everything that we can in order to really do two things, one, is preserve our workforce, make sure that we dont lose our people. Because we need our people to do the second thing we need to do which is to maintain Critical Services for the public. That said, we are trimming everywhere we can. We are dramatically reducing contracts and procurement and were cutting every time everywhere except for the most essential workers like our car cleaners. The other thing that were doing, which is a little eye chronic, is continuing our budget process. The one we start inside a very different economy just a couple of months ago. And that is the previous discussion about our budget were rooted in a conversation about what our agencies values are. So that we can make decisions about how to spend our expected increase in revenues in order to improve services. Ironically, all of the work that weve done around clarifying our values and understanding how to deal with tensions and trade offs. All of that work applies in a time of cuts as it does in a time of expansion. So, were wanting to move forward in these uncertain budget times because we need an essential reference point. We constructed this entire budget starting with clarity in our values and then a very deep conversation about how we address tensions and trade offs, particularly to deliver on an equity objective. We need those clarifications as the starting place for figuring out what it is that were going to do moving forward. So, we know for certain that were not going to be able to project perfectly the Economic Situation were going to be in six months from now, a year from now, two years from now. So what we need, is clarity about how we make the hard choices. And thats why we are moving forward right now. We also know with a fair amount of certainty, well actually, where beer going t were going x months from now because we track our Revenue Streams and we know the trend lines. So we dont know to what degree this is going to trigger a national or global recession, but we know where things stand now and its going to be a while before those Revenue Sources turn back to normal. That is what wore doing now. Good. Well speaking of revenue services, we all know that Congress Passed a federal reloaf package. There was 25 billion for transit agencies such as ours of which 1. 3 billion to go to the bay area transit agencies. Can you share with us what the plan is for those funds . First of all, we are so grateful to our congressional delegation in particularly Speaker Pelosi who fought hard to have the federal stimulus package include transit operations. This is the kind of money that we most need. Operating dollars are how we pay our workforce and our workforce is how we deliver service. What were finding right now, wove got fiscal year that ends the end of june. We will lose about 200 million between the beginning of covid19 and the end of june. The federal stimulus doesnt cover all of that so well use the big portion of the federal stimulus along with all of the other cuts that i talks about along with about 100 other small things in order to make sure that we can close out this fiscal year without layoffs. And were going to be probably very rare among transit agencies that can get to the end of june without layoffs. Other transit agencies that are highly fare box dependent, or dont have access to other sources of revenue are going to have to make deeper cuts than we do. Were also really fortunate and we need to talk about this as well, thanks to the Good Management practices of my predecessors, including the whole Budget Office, the sfmta has a sizable reserve fund or a rainy day fund. Its now raining and were going to have to tap our reserves in order to get through the beginning of the budget season in order or at the beginning of next year, the next fiscal year in order to be able to continue to deliver service. We t dont know what happens afr that. Things are more uncertain the father out this gets. If we dont see some economic stablation or recovery soon . We have been doing Public Outreach and a lot of people have participated in it so we tant lated all the feedback to date and i wanted to share the results with you. As you can see from the spy carts, there are four really main topics that we heard about and those were fares at 30 . A lot of people were interested in fares and asked us not to increase fares. We heard about the desire to see more muni service which would be great although as we discussed our Economic Situation is not looking very well so im be honest and say we cant provide additional muni service at this time. 15 folks talked about the extended meter hour proposal and a significant portion of the comments really asked us to look at our towing. And our fees on towing and maybe even our policy on towing. At the top of the hour, the video that we shared really covered muni fares and service and covered the extended meter hours but what we hadnt talked about yet is the towing. Can you talk about what is in our Budget Proposal as it relates to towing . This is a source of a lot of Public Comments. Including some very passionate and very personal stories at the sfmta board meeting. Staff lis listened to that carefully. Many of us here at the agency, myself included, have spent time living in our cars. So, we understand how important this issue is. So one of the places where were starting, is with the realization that sfmta loses a lot of money on the tow program. None of our tow fees cover our costs. So where were starting is trying to minimize the amount of koeing were doing. Every place where were towing cars, were asking why are we towing cars from there . So that we can shrink the size of the towing program and really minimize the number of tows where people are surprised by the tow. The other thing we heard a lot from is from individuals who have in the past or currently experiencing homelessness and had their cars towed. If you are in San Francisco at this time and you are barely making it by being able to live in your car, the last thing we want is to force people out on the street. Because weve towed their home. So were wanting to eliminate that and under ep doin end up da safety hazard for individuals who are enrolled in city limit service were eliminating the tow fee. It goes down and zero and were also reducing the tow and bot fees for folks who are low income or being towed for the first time, its sort of a San Francisco car owner right of passage to have your car towed once and then you learn not to do that again. We dont want to be punitive around our tow program. We want to keep the streets safe. So, theres a lot more detail you can see in the detail budget package at sfmta. Com budget and that outlines the details of this program. Its probably a pretty good example of how our agency values are reflect inside this budget in a pivot towards equity. I will go through some of the questions wore getting on youtube, hiedi p is asking, do parking permits go up by the same amount as the muni fares and why is parking so much cheaper than a money pass if were frankly a transitfirst city . So this is one of these things that drives me absolutely nuts in San Francisco. So our residential parking permit stickers basically cost 30 cents a day. So, cars get deeply discounted rent when we have them park on city land on city streets. Unfortunately, its against the law for us to raise those permit prices because we are only allowed to charge what it costs to administer the program. So in some parts of San Francisco and the west side and near the big universities, the Residential Parking Permit Program is a very useful tool that helps limit spillover parking makes it easier for residents to find a parking year and its working well and in the more urban and his valley and we sell far more residential stickers than we have on Street Parking spaces. And so the residential sticker is just a hunting license and it doesnt actually provide any useful guarantees and someone coming home late at night can find the parking space any where near their house. One of the things wore going to want to do in the coming year is to ask some hard questions about where the Residential Permit program is working and where its not and if we need to use new mechanisms to balance supply and demand, like changing the rules or the law so that we can use price to balance supply and demand and to have that price reflect the actual rent of that eight by 20foot piece of city land that were giving away for free. I certainly hear you. Why are we charging nothing to provide nearly free rent on very expensive city land while we charge 3 for thro three squaret of space on a bus. Moving on though some other questions we have here. On twitter and ive actually heard similar questions from other people, with respect to charging for muni right now. The question goes, you know, you could do what San Francisco and ac transit is doing free fares, Public Transportation is a public good but sfmta keeps running it like a business. Why . I want to break that down a little bit. Theres two separate questions in there i think. One is why dont we have free fares during this pandemic, during this Health Emergency. Wouldnt it help keep our operators safe due to social distancing and thats question one and question number two, is a little bit more bigger in nature and weve heard this a lot during these budget conversations with the public. Why dont we just offer free muni for all . So im glad you actually brought that down into two questions. On the Operator Safety side, sfmta is unique among any Transit Agency until the United States in that our operators have not collected fares for years. Were proof of payment system. Weve got clipper card reading machines at all doors. And more importantly, we have plexiglass security barrier that is pretty unique to sfmta. We have mandated that operators close the security barrier to separate them from the rest of the vehicle in order to protect them. Weve also recent low changed the rules and collaboration with our partners of the Transit Workers Union to direct passengers to use the rear doors, except for passengers who need the front door because theyre in a wheelchair or they need the kneeling to be able to step up into the bus. Were allowing our vulnerable passengers in the front, everyone else in the back. Thats providing a far higher level of protection for our operators than it possible almost any other agency. So theres no needs for us to stop their collection which is basically the reason why agencies like ac transit stop fare collection is because they do have card readers in the back. The other question is different, why did we charge a muni fare at all. On part of this question is perfectly reasonable. We let people drive on our stress for fro. Why do we charge people to take the most efficient form of transportation. Part of the answer has to do with the way our budget is constructed and why were having this conversation as part of the budget. Free muni has a lot of popular appeal. I understand that. But our transit fares represent 20 of our budget so in order to provide free muni for everyone, we would have to eliminate 20 of our Transit Service. When we talk to our riders weve been having a lot of conversations over the last month with our riders, one of the things is o super clear to almost everyone we talk t. When we ask a question, do you want fro or better muni . Almost universally, the priority is better, faster, frequent, reliable service. And this question is even more important when you actually look at demographic of our riders. San francisco is unusual, particularly here in the United States, in that most of our riders actually have moderate to high incomes. So if we cut service in order to provide free fares for everyone, what were actually doing is subsidizing rich people by Cutting Service to poor people. This creates terribly inequitable outcomes because rich people have other choices. If transit were cut for me, i could ride my fancy bike or take a taxi in order to get to work. Lower income people dont have those choices. So in order to actually create a more equitable system, we have to prioritize Better Service, more importantly, if were going to be we need to direct toes to the people who need it the most and providing free Transit Service to lowest income people and to our local children and Homeless People who need it the most. So what were trying to do is to create a budget that is less about popular appeal and more about actual social equity outcomes. In the long run, i would hope we dont have to make that zero sum choice. That we dont have to choice che between Better Service and fro fares. We have to make that choice. In a utopian San Francisco we would have the resource we see needs to deliver excellent Transit Service that San Francisco needs and not have to rely on our fares. Were a long ways from that and in order to fund it we have to have a conversation about difficult topics like downtown congestion pricing. So if you are interested in how we might actually make free transit work, go to the website, the San Francisco county transportation authority, our sister agency, which is leading a downtown congestion Pricing Strategy as well. If you google downtown congestion pricing that study will come up and tell you how you can participate and actually, maybe, coming up with a Transportation System, that is what San Francisco needs and is far more equitable than what weve got now. You just mentioned possibly taking a taxi which is great so we would be remised if we didnt talk about our taxi industry. It was suffering way before the Health Crisis happened and many people have asked us online and in other forums through out many months, what is our agency doing to really support this very important industry if. So i want to make it really clear i am a huge fan of the San Francisco taxicab industry and i am committed to ensuring a viable financially path forward for the taxi industry that provides a living wage for taxi drivers. This is more important to me give the fact we have no regulatory control over uber and lyft and uber and lyft are not finding a way to serve our wheelchair passengers in a way that the taxis do. They also are not contributing enough compared to the impacts that they create on our streets. So i want to make sure that the taxi industry can compete successfully on particularly in an economic return and so, we are doing altright now a lot rd including the fees taxi drivers pay for their permits and so on. Im trying to increase the use of taxis for city trips so we can save money by getting rid of our fleet vehicles and having City Department trips taken on taxicabs. We are working really hard, given the complex reality that the taxi operators are experiencing with the San Francisco federal credit union that holds the loans they have on their taxi medallions and trying to get the credit union to defer payment on some of those loans during this particular economic crisis. Were lowering insurance requirements so that the operators can save some money and were changing a lot of the small rules necessary to make it easier for taxi operators to get by. We are also ready. Once the legal situation with the San Francisco federal credit union is resolved, to ensure that there is a strong market for taxi medallions again and that we make the system work and we make it competitive. Moving on to some of our other questions from desert flyer, we have, i have trouble getting around at night on the sidewalks because all the cars are parked on the sidewalks. Staff told me they only enforce when i complain. Can you budget for proactive enforcement, please. Yes. So one thing, theres a lot of rumors out there, let me make it really clear. Its never legal to park a car on a San Francisco sidewalk. You should not do that. You should not do that for two minutes while you are running in. Please, do not park on the sidewalks, particularly now as we need to create space for social distancing as people walk around San Francisco. There is still some communications old views from previous eras where it was tolerate. Its not in this injury is in t so our buses arent stuck in congestion and theyre now working to deal with traffic and help out most of the City Hospitals and theyre doing 100 things dealing with logistics and delivering supplies for covid19 and we love our parking control officers. Its unclear how many of them we will be able to afford and if we do afford them, whether theyll be able to bring in enough revenue as economy starts to recover in order to cover their costs but also to expand their services. One of the limitations we have is the parking control officer shifts are concentrated in the times when the meeters are running. And where theyre based is around where we have them do enforcement with high traffic or high numbers of parking meeters. Sometimes it takes us a while to be able to send them out to the neighborhoods to deal with complaints and sometimes you have to to have any around to send them out. Were asking increasingly for them to cite on site and so rather than waiting for calls, to site vehicles blocking the pedestrian way. This is another way in which sfmta is being clear about its values and operationalizing those values. I cant promise that im going to fix in that of that fast but were pointing in that direction. Excellent. Im going to go to yevette. Do you know when the equity our neighborhoods have been long neglected and many housing projects as we know are pending in the area of which will create of course in influx in people and demand for additional service. I hope the agency devotes time energy to this part of San Francisco. Im really glad you raised this question. Theres a couple questions i urge all of you to look at. One is the muni equity strategy and another is a little bit it includes the greater bayview is the Bayview Community plan which is a key guiding document. Theres also another set of documents you can find called the muni forward program. You can see, for example, the huge improvements that weve made on the nine san bruno in order to improve speed, reliability and frequency on the nine, that has been met with a huge increase in ridership and we hoped to solve the crowding problems on the nine but what weve done is created a lot of new nine riders which is good but we still need to do more. So one of the relation we want to adopt this expansion budget is because the expansion budget focused on efforts on neighborhoods that needed the most where our residents have the fewest transportation choices. Changes really significant changes on the 29 sunset which serves all of the southern neighborhoods including bayview and all the way out to really all of the schools and the southern half of the city including city college and sfus and to baker beach in richmond so improvements to the 56 in order to make it more reliability. Right now, i believe the 56 only has one bus on it so when theres a surface problem on that bus, it basically destroys service in the 56 and making it super unreliable. Were not going to fund those improvements any time soon, what our values does is tells us where we should and should not make service cuts. Were committed to if we have to make service cuts, the last place we make cuts is in the neighborhoods with the few events mobility choices and that particularly means parts of district 10 and 11. That, yes, we acknowledge have been neglected in the past and we want to correct for that. Were not able to make the expansion correction any time soon but we can help with, you know, not having it loss more and then setting up conditions to allow our services where people need it the most to be the first that come back and get expanded. So, thats probably more dough tail that you want and not the full answer you want but its a commitment weve made to the neighborhoods that need service the most. Absolutely. Im going to come of our phone lines and tim is asking us by phone, can you discuss the status of crossing guards and what is ahead for them in the next budget cycle and he is asking what are the chances of expanding the program to 20 hours per week of service . Tim is referencing the fact that currently crossing guards to work a full 20 hours, they work 12 and a half hours in the morning for schools and in the afternoon when kids leave so he is asking if were going to expand the program and or go to 20 hours . Yes, this is a good question and its interesting trade off question. So weve got about 200 crossing guards. We have about 200 crossing guards all over the city and their schedules are concentrated at the beginning of school and the end of school and theyre very popular. Theyre much beloved in the community and i say high to Harvey Milk Academy crossing guards. Or at least i did when there was still school in session. And, so part of the question is, do we use our limited resources in order to expand the number of crossing guards and the number of schools that they can serve or to expand their hours. In talking to the crossing guards, most of them are retired people. Theyre doing this to keep busy and contribute to their community. They and the schools were really clear that they wanted to see more crossing guards and more schools rather than paying crossing guards during the middle of the day. Frankly we dont have that much work to do for them that our parking control officers couldnt do so its a situation where given limited resources, expanding the program best serves the public good back to twitter, zack is asking us, hi, sfmta seems relevant to recess the budget in six months when we have a more realistic picture of the state and transit and people can participate more. Do you have any thoughts of that . The city has a sort of fixed twoyear budget cycle and the official budget we adopt on this schedule is the leverage point for all future changes. We know that we are not going to guess our revenue numbers precisely and they become the leverage point that we pivot from when making other justments the budget is a policy document so it establishes the values that then inform how we deal with the inevitable tensions trade off of how we allocate limited resources in order to best achieve the public goods. We want to adopt the policy framework and we want to adopt critical policyrelated measures lick fares and fines and penalties. We want to do that now. We will likely need to make adjustments as we go along. We certainly will not be able to spend for proposals and money to spend. Because if budget does not balance, we will layoff our workforce and thats the last thing i want to do on my watch. Absolutely. More from twitter. Sarah green wald is asking did mta have an emergency plan what has mta learned from this pandemic and shes asking how are you making this budget process accessibility to the public now . Some, for example, do not have internet access. These are all good questions. One of the things that im so grateful for being at this agency for is that my predecessor and our current Budget Office have set aside a substantial rainy day fund. A reserve fund for when there was a catastrophe. We have one and that reserve fund is going to save amount of jobs. And im so grateful for it. The other advantage is the leadership of mayor london bredd and the fact we are a City Department and we have arguably the best Municipal Health department in the country. So, their leadership meant that San Francisco got started on the shut down sooner than any other place did and that is saving us. Its also meant weve been able to collaborate with the department of publichealth to have really clear plans in place for what happens when, as we knew would be inevitable, sfmta employees tested positive for covid19. Are we activated . Our Department EmergencyOperations Center promptly entered the crisis. Weve been collaborating on a daily basis with the department of publichealth getting approval and guidance from them on all the details in order to protect our workforce and to do Contingency Planning for what happens. So, i am really proud and i cannot claim credit for any of this but im proud that my colleagues have done such excellent advanced planning that is making our agency more secure in this crisis than almost any of our other counterparts. Ive lost track of the other part of this question . In terms of having access to public process in the ages where wore basically doing everything digitally and of course as we know, some folks dont have access to the internet. This is something we want to be sensitive too. Sincsince covid19, we were proy as an agency having the Biggest Online presence. Weve been hosting our board meetings online and this is our Second Community town hall that weve done online. Weve also been doing a whole array of Online CommunityOrganization Meetings and for the public meetings, including this one, we know not everyone has internet. Most people have access to a telephone. So all of our public meetings, including this one, theres a dialin number for people who cant get online and cant see our faces can still hear the text and can call in on their telephone. In fact were getting a significant number of people picking up their phone and calling in. All of those phone calls are transcribed for us and vick has been reading some of them. We want to make sure people have a real opportunity to participate and we have been reliant for some of our communitybased organizations, like so many can and the social equity organizations have been participating by phone as well and we have still early in the crisis did some inperson meetings with social distance. I have a question from youtube. Can you raise the tickets for safety violations and for r. P. P. S . Yes. So this is another complicated question. Again, if you go to sfmta. Com budget, you will see all of the details proposals for how were making adjustments to our citation fees and fines. Some of those fee and fine categories we have control over and many of them we do not. There are limits controlled by the State Government where we cant razor lower and the rules are complicated. What weve tried to do is think about fees fines, well, first of all, the objective of fees and fines should never be either revenue nor should they be punitive. Our primary objective should be getting people to pay their fair share and to do the right thing. Thats the only reason why we have fees and fines. To the extent that we have fees and fines we want to make sure that we look at them with an equity len lense. So a fine for something jeopardizing safety of vulnerable users should be higher for the fine that is annn annoyance. Over staying your time limit for your parking space, your meter, should be greater than the fine for not paying your 3 muni fares for your three square feet of space. Were trying to make sense of all of them to the extent that we can. Ultimately, we know that fixing the equity problems in fees and fines requires a state legislative strategy because the most important once we do not have control over. Its one of the reasons why the sfmta has been leading in order to make sure that those fines for things that are jeopardizing the safety of vulnerable user are increased. And that its a fine for stuff that is an annoyance are reduced at the state level and we have an equity framework that would allow San Francisco to adopt and take it a couple steps further. As you can see im passionate about this topic and really frustrated that we dont have the control that we need as a municipality in order to get it all right. Where we do have control, weve been very diligent and for example, we are increasing fares for people double parking in a bike lane which is a complete safety violation. To the state maximum. And similarly, where we have people riding scooters on the sidewalks, that fine is going up as well. So, very good. Were closing in on our time. And i just wanted to take a minute and clarify a little bit about the tow policy and say the fee for first time tow is eliminated for individuals experiencing homelessness. Certified by and the first tow fee is still in place for most others. Although it was reduced for low income individuals. So just wanted to clarify that point. Were at 12 47. I just want to acknowledge again that we ran a little bit late and apologized for that and we answered quite a few questions and there are questions remaining that we will followup with folks that asked us after this meeting in the next couple of days, should you hear from us. But to be respectful of everyones time, just want to go ahead and close question do you have any closing thoughts and remarks given where we are where the budget and health pandemic. First of all, thank you for putting up with this long conversation. Your input is important to us and its very much shaped the work that weve done so far. I want to repeat. That the only relevant statement of any organizations values is its budget. This is an incredibly important exercise for us and whether our revenues are collapsing or expanding, we can make good decisions about how we use our limited resources to uphold the public good if were clear about our values and if we understand how to make the difficult trade offs. For me, i can promise to continue to update the public to be fully transparent and really to be brutally honest. This is going to be a really, really difficult two years. Perhaps unprecedented in the last 100 years. And the only way were going to get through this is by being honest, by being transparent, by engaging with the public and by coming back to our core values to make the tough choices. So thank you all for joining us. And well be back with more information as history unfolds. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon and welcome to the meeting of the land use and transport Committee Meeting for today, monday, march 30, 2020. And it is a special meeting. I am the chair of the committee, supervisor aaron peskin. Joined by vice chair supervisor safai and supervisor dean preston. And the clerk is miss erica major. Miss major, do you have announcements . Clerk yes, please due to the covid19 Health Emergency and to protect Board Members and the City Employees and the public, the board of supervisors legislative chamber and Committee Room are closed. However, members will be participating in the meeting remotely. And precaution is taken pursuant to the statewide stay at home order and all preceding and proceeding local, state and federal orders, declarations and orders. Members will be by teleconference or telephone if the video fails and participate in the meetings to the extent as if they were physically present. Public comment is available on each item of this agenda. Channel 26 and sfgovtv. Org are streaming the number at the top of the screen. Each speaker will be allowed two minutes to speak. Comments or opportunities to use to speak during the Comment Period are available via phone call by calling 888204 8882045984. Again, that number is 8882045984. The access code is 3501008. Again, the access code is 3501008. When connected, wait until the Public Comment is opened and dial to speak. And they are to call from a quiet location and speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television or radio. Alternatively, you may submit Public Comment in either of the following ways email myself, the land use and transport Committee Clerk at my email and it will be forwarded to the board of supervisors. And it will be included as part of the official file. Finally, items acted upon today will appear on the board of supervisor agenda on april 7, 2020, unless otherwise stated. Supervisor peskin thank you, miss major and i thank the clerk of the board of supervisors and her incredible staff during this period. In addition to clerk calvillo and our Committee Clerk, miss major, id like to thank john see and john carroll and prent halipa, and john carroll, i think that i said john carroll. Thank you for your incredible behinbehindthescenes effort te this and other meetings possible as our participatoriy democracy survives during the coronavirus time. And with that, madam clerk, please call the first item. Clerk item 1 is an order to submit the planning code to create the intermediate occupancy residential use characteristic with the administrative code for enforceability and to prohibit rental units for temporary occupancies and the controller to analyze the impact and appropriate findings. Supervisor peskin thank you, miss major. Colleagues this was continued from the meeting which occurred a few weeks ago right before the shelter in place order was issued by the mayor. And it is my intention to continue this item to the call of the chair. But before we do that we need to take Public Comment. So, madam clerk, please work whatever magic you need to work to allow the members of the public to comment on this item. Clerk we are checking to see if theres any callers. Operator, let us know if theres any callers ready. indiscernible . Supervisor peskin seeing no Public Comment on item number one, Public Comment is closed. And colleagues, again, we have a roll call vote on continuing this item to the call of the chair. Clerk and continue on the call of the chair. Supervisor peskin. Aye. Clerk aye. Supervisor safai. Safai aye. And supervisor peskin. Peskin aye. Supervisor peskin this item is continued to the call of the chair. Next item please. Clerk two, the Building Code to extend the time for existing buildings with a place of public accommodations to comply with the requirement to have all primary entries and paths of travel into buildings accessible for persons with disabilities. Supervisor peskin this is brought to us by president yees office to provide flexibility to Small Businesses and other places of public accommodations, seeking to come into compliance with mandatory accessibility requirements. I spoke with president yee and his chief of staff jim lowe who are actually here at the Emergency Operations center. They do not have any comments and we are joined by the department of building inspection with mr. Bill strong and Thomas Kessler as well as the office of Small Business. I thought that wed start by having a presentation on this ordinance which was introduced before the coronavirus emergency and recommended by the building inspection commission. With that, mr. Strong, would you like to make a presentation to this committee and the public . Yes. Supervisors, thank you very much. Bill strong with the department of building inspection. Weve asked supervisor yee and members of the committee to consider this extension because as of todays report we have a weekly monitoring report of the accessible business entrance compliance and our compliance category is still running at about 60 . These numbers are actually getting a little better, but the reality is that i think that especially with the public Health Emergency, Property Owners are going to need a little more time to come into full compliance. So the Building Department having taken a look at this is saying that we should extend this at least until september 1 of this year and possibly consider tying it to the ending of the shelter in place order, with an additional, say, 90 or 120 days after that. But im happy to hear any specific questions that the committee has on this. And we just think that in this time this is a stress since most of these properties indiscernible it makes sense to give the owners a little bit more time to comply. Supervisor peskin thank you, mr. Strong. Mr. Kessler, anything that you would like to add . No, i think that he explained it pretty well. One of the things that were not doing right now because its these are commercial buildings, theyre not considered essential infrastructure under the mayors order. So we would not be issuing any permits if the permits were required under this ordinance. We would not be processing them at the present time because theyre not considered essential. Theyre nonessential construction. Supervisor peskin understood. So it sounds to me like well probably have to continue this or further continue this beyond september, but we will look forward to the advice of the department and your commission as we go forward. Are there any questions, colleagues, for the department of building inspection . All right. Why dont we move on to the office of Small Business. Thank you, supervisor peskin. And committee members. So in your packet you did see that the Small Business commission endorsed and is recommending approval for the extension. Our office is working very closely with the department of building inspection, working with the Small Businesses, that are being required by their Property Owner to meet this compliance. And we do have a Grant Program that is available for them. This grant money is not general funded so there will not be any issues or concerns about that funding still being there to assist businesses who need to access it to achieve compliance. And i think that the last thing that i just want to keep reiterating is that as a city that prides itself on civil rights that this is an Important Initiative that were undertaking to ensure the civil rights of individuals with disabilities are upheld. Supervisor peskin thank you. And if businesses want to get in touch with the office of Small Business about the grants that you just mentioned, how would they do that . They can do that by calling 4155546134. Or emailing sfose sfgov. Org. Supervisor peskin thank you. And maybe we should just further clarify things with d. B. I. Which is insofar as you indicated that no Building Permits for this type of activity are allowed under the emergency order issued by the mayor and concurred to by the board of supervisors during the coronavirus emergency, our permits that were previously issued, can those be acted upon if they were already issued . Or are those held in advance during this time as well . Yes, in general they would be they shouldnt be working on these because theyre they are considered nonessential or to the mayors order would extend to issue permits also. Unless, you know, of course if theyre partially in process, i think they should continue until theyre complete. But i would say if we havent issued a permit and they havent started the work, they should suspend the work until the emergency order is changed. Supervisor peskin thank you. And back to miss dickendreesy. Is the office doing any proactive outreach to businesses . I realize that is difficult now, but its still an important question. The office of Small Business is not doing proactive outreach. The way in which this is working is through the checklist that needs to be submitted. When d. B. I. Receives a checklist and its been identified that a Small Business is being required by their Property Owner to complete the Building Code requirement, d. B. I. Puts that business in touch with us. And, of course, weve been working closely with the merchants to make sure that theyre informed about the program. And just to reiterate that this is a requirement of the Property Owner and so if the Property Owner is not submitting the checklist then theres a particular form that they can state that has to be filled out and submitted with the checklist which is one of the ways in which were able to identify that a Small Business is now engaged in meeting this compliance requirement. Supervisor peskin understood. Thank you for that. Supervisor safai or preston, any questions or comments . Not at this time. Nope. Supervisor peskin why dont we open this up for Public Comment. Any members of the public that would like to comment on this item, number 2 . Clerk were checking to see if theres callers in the queue. Operator, please let us know. Mr. Chair, there are no callers wishing to speak. Supervisor peskin okay, seeing no Public Comment on this item. Public comment is closed. And colleagues, why dont we send this to the full board with recommendation, if that is acceptable to you. And i did see, madam clerk, in one of the memoranda from the president and from the clerk of the board, can this item be sent as a Committee Reporter on just be sent in the normal course of business . Clerk in the normal course. Supervisor peskin okay. So on the motion to send this item to the full board of supervisors with recommendation, can we have a roll call please. Clerk on the motion as stated, supervisor preston. Preston, aye. And supervisor safai, safai, aye. Supervisor peskin. Peskin, aye. You have three ayes. Supervisor peskin okay. The motion is approved. Next item please. Clerk an ordinance amending the planning code to correct typographical errors, update outdated crossreferences and make nonsubstantive revisions to clarify or simplify code language, amending article 4 to move the language regarding timing of fee payment and amending the code to correct outdated planning code crossreferences and affirming the planning. Supervisor peskin thank you, miss major. Colleagues this is the next up in a long series of planning code cleanups which has been the life long persui pursuit ofe aaron star at the cit departmenf planning. And we have this as the title indicates these are almost all technical corrections and typographical corrections together with a couple of policy changes or clarifications to article 4 which miss juarez can talk about. Thank you, supervisor peskin. As miss major outlined, it amends the planning code to correct typos and to update crossreferences and make nonsubstantive revisions to clarify and simplify the code. It will amend article 4 to move the language regarding timing of payments to the beginning of the article and then crossreference this with new subsection into the individual impact fee sections. Lastly, proposed ordinance will also add an additional fee waiver based on the replacement of buildings damaged or destroyed by fire or other calamities. The reason behind this is that theres thought to be no new net impact when were replacing said building or said use. The Planning Commission heard this item on december 12th, 2019, and recommended that you approve the ordinance with modifications. indiscernible . The first modification is to update planning code references and the administrative, health and police codes. And the second modification is to revise planning codes, section 155 to clarify that commercial thruway streets to find a better streets plan to also be protected. And the proposed ordinance will improve the quality of the planning code and make it easier for the objective and the goals of the code to be carried out. This concludes staff presentation and im available to answer any questions. Supervisor peskin miss flores, i assume that the additional modifications suggested by the Planning Commission are in the second version of the legislation which is the version that is before us, is that correct . Yes, that is correct. Supervisor peskin right. So no amendments are necessary and those have already been amended in between version one and version two . Correct. Supervisor peskin thank you. Colleagues, do you have any questions or comments . No. No. Supervisor peskin seeing none, is there any Public Comment on item number 3 . Clerk operator, please to check to see if theres any callers. Chair, there are no callers wishing to speak. Supervisor peskin with that Public Comment is closed and, again, i will make a motion to send this item to the full board of supervisors with recommendation. And on that motion, madam clerk, a roll call, please. Clerk supervisor preston. Preston, aye. Supervisor safai. Safai, aye. Supervisor peskin. Peskin, aye. We have three ayes. Supervisor peskin okay, the motion passes. Madam clerk, anymore business before this committee . Clerk there is no further business. Supervisor peskin seeing none, we are adjourned. 5, 4. Great. Good afternoon, everyone. The meeting w good afternoon, everyone. The meeting will come to order. Welcome to the monday, march 30 sp