When weighed against the benefits of this project, namely the creation of muchneeded housing, and a more walkable streetscape, the mitigations were found to be sufficient by the planning commission. Furthermore, the appellant proposed alternatives that were similar to two alternatives studied in the eir. Packages of design changes to mitigate the Historic Resource were included in four preservation alternatives in the eir, which are not considerably different from the alternatives proposed by the amelants. Appel. They argue it should have been included in the chapter but similar alternatives were studied and sequa did not require that an eir consider every alternative or combination of alternatives. Based on evidence presented today, it is my belief the final eir complies with the sanfrancisco admin code, providing an adequate impact of the project and thus, will be making a motion to deny the ail peel and affirm the final eir certification. A motion made and is there a second . Seconded by supervisor ronan and then lets take role call. Deputy city john givener. Just to clarify the item that youll be voting on as a motion to approve item 23 and take items 24 and 25. That was the motion. Role call, please. role call . There are ten ayes. Ok, so the motion passes. Were going to move on to the planning commissions decision well, the planning commissions decision is affirmed. We will consider the conditional use appeal, which is items 27, 28 and 29. Consideration of the appeal of the conditional use authorization involves analysis of whether the plans commissions determination to authorize the project was appropriate. This hearing is quasi judicial. To reverse the plan Agency Decision or authorize conditional use, we would need eight votes of the board as required. So do we have a motion . Supervisor stephanie . Thank you. To summarize, we heard from the Planning Department that the alternative plan would not produce 744 units of housing with 58 familysized unit. The anies werthey were studied r the most benefits for our city and neighborhoods. Specifically, the proposal includes 186 units of subsidized affordable Senior Housing, onsite childcare for 175 children which is more than offered at that site. Over five acres of open space, including 2. 9 acres with walkways that integrate the existing neighborhoods and more than what is required of the project sponsor. The proposal maximizes neighborhood reference by offering no those presiding three quarters of the project side. It a leading level, targeted lead gold or better and increase neighborhood resiliency with an awss fee in the amount of one million. The proposal will generate millions in Community Fees towards jobs, housing, and transportation and millions more in annual property tax revenue by converting a tax except use to a taxable use. The Public Benefits this brings to our neighborhoods and our city makes the conditional use both necessary and desirable and for those reasons, i ask today that we reject the appeal so we can move forward with creating these muchneeded homes for families and lowincome seniors. Were looking at 27, 28 and 29. So i can clarify my motion. I would like to make a motion to move item 27 forward and to table items 28 and 29. Dido you have an amendment to item 27 that you would like to make . Yes, we do have an amendment that everybody has received. And this is on page 1. We have to make this amendment and i will ask deputy givener to explain lines one, 22 and 23. The amendments that supervisor stephanie circulated 27 and 31 which youll consider shortly, both merely updating the sequa findings that accompany the motion. So supervisor stephanie has made a motion to amend item 27 as described. Is there a second . Seconded by supervisor walton without any objections and well pass the amendments. Do we have a motion to approve the authorization as amended . So moved. And motion made and seconded by supervisor safaye. To prove the authorization, can we take this motion as amended. Can we take this motion same house, same call . Then the motion carries unanimously. Mr. President , youve tabled items 28 and 29, as well. Yes. I believe the motion was to approved 27 as amended is tabling 28 and 29. Correct. Thank you for the clarification. And now we will lets move to the tentative map approval. Do we have a motion for items 31, 32 and 33 . Thank you. As publics works described, many relate to sequa rather than the map itself and they are best addressed in the sequa appeal which we just dealt with and i do not want to address the i do want to clarify two claims. The first claim is that the tentative map includes inaccuracies. Public works describe the fact of the map is accurate and errors are minor in nature and corrected. The appellant i think this is important on the record why were ruling in a certain way. Specifically, the appellant claimed the map sheet that lot one has two commercial units and 17 remembe17 residential units. The proposed sconin zoning chans would allow fronting on california street. The public works identifies condominium parcels, residential or commercial. The two units to facilitate parking for the duplexes which park works considers a nonremember use for purposes of identifying the condominium. This will not allow a public use under the planning code where such code is not permitted under applicable zoning. The claim that the map is accurate is unfounded and this board should reject it. The city failed to not the appellant per the block book in the. We know the city satisfied all reviews and block books are not provided by the public works but by the San FranciscoPlanning Department. Weve been inform ed thi informe block book is not required but are intended to provide the applications for permits on property within the city that is subject to the San Francisco planning code that the requester would not otherwise receive. Both Planning Department and public works satisfied all requirements in this regard. With that said, as we heard, none of the claims made an appeal before us on the tentative map approval, show errors in the. Maps anmaps. I ask that you joing the appeal. I would move item 31 forward so before you do that, would you like to make a simple intercept. Amendment . The same one made with regard to the ceu just plained by deputy city john givener and i would like to move that. The motion to move it and is there a second . Seconded by supervisor brown and with no objection, then the amendment passes. And so now the motion is to approve item 31 as amended and approving the department of public works determination is to table items 32 and 33. That motion was made by supervisor stephanie and is there a second . Seconded by supervisor walton. Can we take this item as amended same house, same call . Ok, then without objection, item 31, as amended is arrive is appd 32 and 33 are tabled. The final map is approved. Call 3446. 3436. Referred without recommendation from land use and transportation committee. Item 34 is to create the 3333 california street special use district and to make the appropriate findings. Item 35 approves the Development Agreement between the city and Laurel Heights partners, llc for the development of the 10. 25 area site located at california street and presidio avenue and make the appropriate findings and item 36, an ordinance to approve a major encroachment improvement for Laurel Heights partners to occupy masonic avenue, pine street, mayfair to drive and laurel street jan fore purpose of maintaining landscape planters, and other improvements and also to make the appropriate findings. Supervisor stephanie, would you like to make a motion to amend these items . I would like im not prepared to yet make the amendments on these items. Do you want us to come back later . Or do you have no amendments . Well, i would like to make comments about the ordinances themselves. Ok. Is that ok. You can make a comment . Ok. Thank you. I think this merits standing because i think this is an extremely important moment in terms of legislation that we are about to pass. , hopefully. Before you is legislation creating a special use district, a Development Agreement and a major encroachment ordinance to bring to life a project that has been in the making for five years. A project that will bring muchneeded housing to district two and to our city, as well as many other benefits for our community. When this started in 2014, i was a legislative aid to supervisor farrell, i was the person who went to numerous, Numerous Community meetings at the jcc, peoples homes and my office. All along, i have cared deeply about the community, the neighbors who have had their concerns with the project, including the appellants who i know well and i have wanted to make sure that we ended up with a project that would be not just good for the neighborhood, but a project that truly enhanced the lives of our community. Obviously, theres disagreement. Youve seen people in favour. Youve seen people in opposition. Thats called life. I knew that i wasnt going to make everybody happy. Its absolutely impossible, but i wanted to stand before you today, colleagues, knowing that in my heart, gut and mind and its not just about my heart and gut, but hoping to facilitate a project that would be an incredible add to an already vibrant community. To do that, i knew when i became supervisor that adjustments to the project would need to be made. So what did we do . As youve herbed at length today, the Development Agreement is for a 744 unit Housing Project with 186 projects dedicated for seniors. The developer will be responsible for funding onsite Senior Housing and the Development Agreement is the best way for the city to ensure that this major benefit is realized. Now, the original development, the original proposal had an Office Building planned for the site across from the jcc and only 558 units of housing. When the neighborhood raised concerns about the Office Building and the potential traffic that would impose upon the community, i wor worked to eliminate the office instead dedicate that to Affordable Housing for seniors. Why seniors . We know that there is an unlimited key man for all types of Affordable Housing, both family and Senior Housing in our city. And although i cannot solve all of the citys problems with this one project, i knew that i could most definitely hone in on a problem that is important to me and not just in district two but also in the city. And the facts are clear, we are not coming close to meeting the need for Senior Housing now and into our future. According to the Planning Departments 2018 housing inventory, in the years between 202014 and 2018 were for senior. The board president has been call for a larger emphasis on the production of Senior Housing and i have been there with him. As in my own personal experience, dealing with a sick father, i have immersed myself in what it takes to properly care for our seniors and learned how precious few resources are actually available to them including housing, especially in San Francisco. And so we drill down on how to make this project the best fit for the neighborhood. It became clear that there was an opportunity to increase that unit count by changing the walnut building along california street from office to housing. Seeing this opportunity to provide 186 units of affordable Senior Housing in the standalone building. This is what is so great about this project. There are Senior Services on the ground floor. Together with Childcare Services in an Innovative Partnership with the senior facility. And this is something i could not pass up. Its something i was going to insist upon if we would move this project forward. And what we need to understand about Senior Housing is that its difficult or impossible to provide it in some type of distributed inclusionary manner and the fact we have this whole building opportunity to me was absolutely significant. And in addition, there is an existing senior facility across the street, offering the opportunity to Share Services and create a Senior Community in this location. I think we all know or we should if were paying attention, one effort worse things senior suffers from is isolation and loneliness and the fact were bringing them together with services across the street in a jcc and a neighbor transit rich and where you can walk to a grocery store, restaurant or movie is something that will enhance the lives of those seniors as we look forward to welcoming them to our neighborhood. The affordable senior building will be on california street, adjacent to transportation and retail across from the jcc. The Development Agreement requires direct marketing and a reference in leasing to seniors already living within a three quarters mile. Usually the radius is half a mile but we increased it to include not just district two, but parts of district five and district one, as well. I have come to understand the derth of housing for seniors and how expensive housing can be and how even with family help it can be hard to age in place or find a suitable, affordable home. I am determined to do everything in my power to address our seniors needs, especially when it comes to giving them places to live. That is why im proud of this Development Agreement before you today, which ilene will create more affordable senior homes than we have built in district two over the past decade. It is very telling of the Robust Community process that we do all agree that we need housing on the site and im proud to have pushed the increase to 744 units and proud that everyone does agree that 744 units at this site is desirable. The remainder of the project, the remainder of the project is designed with multibedroom units including a new large Childcare Center on site to appeal to families hoping to stay in the area. How many times do we hear about families in San Francisco and about the lack of childcare and parents who cant get to work because they cant afford childcare or not near where they work . We hear about it all of the time and we try to create Public Policy around it and we are able to create 58 more slots more children in this site. Between the Senior Housing, Childcare Centre and family size units, this project will accommodate a wide range of needs while maintaining our communitys familyfriendly character. And so since ive introduced this legislation back in july, i heard some additional concerns from the neighbors and i tried, i knew i would not be able to meet every demand. I wish i could but its not feasible and wont make the project work. I took what i heard and tried the best i could in terms of making amendments to retail that are allowed at the site in the amount of retail. As part of the negotiateds on the retail agreement, i was able to reduce the space from 64,000 feet to approximately 35,000 square feet. We also made certain all of the retail would be placed along california street so that we maintain the Laurel Village merchant corridor connecting the retail from spruce street to presidio avenue. I addressed retail use based on feedback from the community. And my amendments included limiting the hours of operation from 6 00 a. M. To midnight and right now its 2 00 a. M. Just like Laurel Village. They wanted 11 00 p. M. I decided on midnight because i thought it was the best in e ins after croof a compromise. Restricting some commercial using and adding a letter to the board file with agreements to work with the Laurel Village merchants. I believe the retail amendments i made will help to ensure a healthier corridor. Today i do have some additional amendments to address concerns about the impact of construction and removal of street trees. I have a package of neighborhood construction enhancements that will ensure the project will use best practises in minimizing the impact on the neighborhood and these are some of the best practises to develop on another project on sacramento street and vital that every developer in a neighborhood follow them. And todays enhancements include sound suppression, efficient delivery and insulation and emission controls on the construction crews. I understand the construction will impact neighbors and i wanted to do everything i could to make sure the very best construction practises are used on this project. Now i want to get to trees, because trees are emotional topics. I was telling someone earlier, trees and dogs, right. Theyre emotional. Its hard to talk about. Its hard to talk about the loss of a tree or sometimes about the fact you may not be ai able to k your dog along chrisy field what am i trying to say, without a leash. Thank you. Iits emotional and i get that. I looked hard at the tree issue because i care about everywhere who came up and talked about the trees. I want to address concerns raised. As public works described, the plan is not before us today. With that said, the site plan was specifically designed to retain key trees. You heard carla short say it, wishes other developers would do this. It was designed to retain key trees on the private portion of the excite celebrate the and cef this. Someone mentioned the tunnel tops. I was at that event, too, talking about the tunnel tops opening in the presidio. The Landscape Architect on the tunnel tops is on this project, as well. So the plan includes saving oak trees on laurel, where townhome is literal little cut in half to highlight one particular tree. As well as cypress plaza, which there is a public plaza built around one cypress tree and i want to be very clear on the tree canopy issue and correct misinformation. While not part of the major encroachment permit, the project overall will be adding 286 additional trees, bringing the tree count from 226 of the current site, existing trees to 512 trees. The project was designed, also, as lead Neighborhood Development gold and one of the first projects aligned with the citys new bio diversity guidelines to support aims just as Water Conservation and quality healthier air. Now, again, with the trees, ive looked at the plans for the trees. I sat down with the project sponsor on several occasions to discuss the tree removal and ive been on the site several times to understand the tree canopy and what is being removed and more importantly, what is being added. And for me, i know that we can have tree expos trees and housi. The idea that the project sponsor is willing to create trees cant be further from the truth. This is not a case of theyve paved paradise to put up a parking lot. I would never let that happen. What is before us today is the major encroachment permit. The permit includes enhanced Pedestrian Access to the site, increased Pedestrian Safety, to increase Pedestrian Safety which is much needed, as well as increase to current sidewalk lifts around the perimeter of the project. So accomplish these improvements and the objectives that the overall Housing Project, the major encroachment ordinance is seeking the removal of 15 street trees and 18 significant trees as we heard. Now, as noted in the arborist report, many of the trees on california street are leaning and have circling roots and codominant leaders, mature news Christmas Trees can uplift sidewalks as they age and drop fruit litter as the report says and would create serious tripping hazards for seniors in the new Affordable Housing. So the proposed replacement rept street are fruitily olive trees. The trees recommended by our own City Department by the citys bureau of urban forestry due to grout tolerance, Strong Branch structure and low maintenance requirements. Fruitless olive trees are very neat trees and they do not drop debris or fruit and they will be installed at a 24inch box size meeting the borough of urban requirements. Installed in front of Laurel Village improvement project, creating what i think will be a beautiful long tree canopy on the length of california street. I also want to address the 18 significant trees that were described. As defined i dont need to get into the definition. Its located within ten feet of the property edge of the situation and 25 feet in high with a canopy 15 in diameter or trunk diameter in 12inches at breast height. Of 18 significant trees, only one this good health and that one tree is located directly in the middle of the parcel where 186 affordable senior homes will be built and there will be Childcare Services. They propose replacing this with 49 new trees and the replacement tree list includes the species we heard about. Something supervisor pes kirks n drilled down on was the 88 street trees. Thrill arthey revert to the jurn of pu public works to avoid a fragments structure and we all know and have been dealing with streets and we know that the city has limited funds to maintain the current trees we have under or jurisdiction. So today, i am introducing an amendment that will require the project sponsor to extend the warrant period from three years to six years, to ensure the proposed new trees properly take root and well established with an understanding that at the end of the period public works and the project team will discuss the project sponsors ongoing maintenance of the trees. I want to thank the project sponsor for agreeing that. Before i wrap up, i would really like to thank several people because this has been a process. First i want to thank the community for the feedback and input. I know theres been several different opinions on this project and i know several will leave unhappy today and im sorry for that. I cannot please everyone and can only do what i think is right for this Community Based on all of the needs that we need to take care of. And i want to thank those who weighed in without the vitriolic anger. We dont need that level of discussion talking about projects and housing and childcare. Thank you all for your feedback and for coming to Public Comment today. I also want to thank our departments, oewd forrering that youve done on Development Agreement. Theres many of you, so thank you. And our City Attorneys Office who has been helpful. Its a complex project. For those willing to work with them when i pushed back to achieve what i think is the best project for our community. And also, i want to thank my staff. This is an undertaking mainly daniel herstein, who has been great and helpful in this project, so thank you. Colleagues, i want to wrap up by saying i have worked hours, days and years on this project as a legislative aid and now a supervisor and i have tried my best to balance the competing interest and opinions and i have been determined to land on a project that i know is right for the neighborhood community. I implore you to support the three ordinances to bring this project to life and to bring more housing to district too. Thank you. Thank you for the details. Supervisor stephanie, you made a motion to amend, correct . Correct. The First Amendment with regard to the maintenance of the trees, does everybody have that in front of them . Our City Attorney has all of amendments. Would you like him to describe that . Yes, that would be wonderful. Deputy city again. The amendment that supervisor stephanie mentioned requiring the permitee to take on three years of street tree maintenance is on page 3, beginning on line 18 of the major encroachment permit ordinance, which is item 36. Supervisor stephanie has circulate thed amendments to 345 and 36 to reflect the updated supplemental sequa findings. And has also proposed acceptingg amendments and the Development Agreement has been modified to change the parking ratios to reflect the amendments that were adopted in the la land use and transportation committee. Any questions on the amendments made . So supervisor stephanie, youre going to make a motion for all those amendments and is there a second . Seconded by supervisor safaye. Can we take these amendments supervisor, im sorry. I missed one of the amendments that supervisor stephanie circulated in the sud ordinance permitting arch activities. So i would like to amend the ordinance to add the sequa findings on page 2 to read, and adopt a supplemental sequa findings on board, as well as technical amendment on page 3, line 25, to strike other residential uses to replace it with arts activities. So we have amendments that were described by supervisor stephanie and our deputy City Attorney, john givener. Seconded by safaye with additional amendments. Can we take these amendments without objections . Then it passes. Supervisor stephanie, do you want to make a motion to the rest of them . You need a role call, mr. President or without objection on the items . To 34, 35 and 36. Lets take that as amended and is there any can we take this same house, same call . Then all three passes as amend amended. So without they pass and the first reading. And madam clerk, to role call for introductions again. Thank you. Supervisor stephanie, if you kneeneeded to come pack, we coud come back to you or start with you for new business. Submit. Thank you. Supervisor walton. Submit. Mr. President . Sure. One item. We have been having muchneeded conversations about Mental Health throughout our city recently and thank you for several of my colleagues who have promoted and elevated that discussion. We are aware that Mental Health im going to wait a second. I will acts for another hearing on Mental Health and youth and what our city is doing around childrens medical. 15 youth under the age of 18 suffers from some type of Mental Illness. The most includes anxiety, depression, eating disorders and attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder. And the World Health Organization found that half of our Mental Illness begins at the age of 14 and three quarters by the mid20s. If untreated, they influence the Childrens Development and their education retainment and potential to live fulfilling and productive lives. Children with mental disorder face stigma, isolation, discrimination as well as lack of control over their access to healthcare i and treatment. But while we know that prevention can work to help our children and youth, this has stayed flat and there is a major shortage of Mental Health services with children and adolescentses. Adolescents. This is an alarming increase in suicides among our young children. , young people. According to the center for Disease Control and prevention, from 2000 to 2016, the rate from girls 16 to 24 rose by 80 and rose by 20 for boys in the same age category. And the cdcp found that suicide is now the second leading cause of death. Death is more prevalent than death from cancer, aids, influenza, birth defects, lung disease and Heart Disease combined. So while we move forward with a united desire to fundamentally reform and improve or Mental Health system, i want to be sure that we understand the current state of Mental Health services and programming for our children and youth and what we can and should keep in mind as this reform effort moves forward. This is why im calling for this hearing on the topic of the joint School District and college select committee. In particular, i would like to know how the School District is heading to identify children who might need help and how our students who are identified refer to City Services in helping you with Mental Health conditions to continue to support and expand. I want to mention that the world day of remembrance door world traffic victims is happening very soon and i personally want to invite each one of you to the San Francisco bay area for safe street and walk at city hall this sunday at 3 00 bring arenas awareness. The rest i submit. Thank you, and before i call on supervisor brown, supervisor walton, did awas you wish to spo his role call . I would love to be added as a cosponsor. Thank you. Supervisor brown . I also wanted to be added on as a cosponsor and president yi, i think this is such an important issue. I am wondering if i could make a friendly suggestion that it be sent to a full Board Committee versus a committee with the School District and city college. I actually think that i would like to find out what were doing first as a city and to call the School District to a full hearing with the board . I can discuss this with you later. I just think that it would give us more time to really get the early ed folks there, too, and have a comprehensive hearing and i think this is an issue that is very fresh. We have not heard this before and we had not had a hearing on this before and i thank you for bringing this forward. I just wanted to actually cosponsor the hearing with you and make that friendly suggestion that we properly have it at a board of supervisors hearing. I would like to consider that and i will talk to, also, the chair of the joint committee to see what makes the most sense, thank you. Thank you. Supervisor brown . Its november and its honored usher in American Indian month here in San Francisco. Its important that we reflect back on our collective history and remember the injustices that we have survived as a community. Its also a cause to celebrate. Our culture is neither dead, not what you see in the movies or the stuff in history books. Our culture is here, its alive and its thriving. And we accomplished a lot this year from the removal of the racist day statue to the thread exhibition to the Second Annual official ceremony honoring Indigenous People in San Francisco. I want to invite you all to our annual American Indian heritage night celebration tomorrow, wednesday, november 13th. We will be celebrating here at city hall from 5 30 to 7 30 and i hope you all will join us. This annual gathering honors the american culture, local heroes and leaders who have worked to strength astrengthen initiatives will feature the kickoff of the american indi Indian Cultural c. Im glad were making this a reality. Lets remember while justice begins with recognition, it hazardous not endoesnot end the. I will continue that fight on the rest of my committee. The rest i submit. Supervisor fewer. Colleagues, im thrilled to announce legislation to develop the Business Plan for the first public bank in San Francisco. With the passage of ab857 creating a Pilot Program for charts in state of california, we want San Francisco to be the first in line to create our own public municipal bank. The taxpayer money is currently held in private commercial banks that often engage in socially and environmentally destructive practises, fundamentally against the values of San Francisco. A public bank would allow the city to have a more local control, transparency, selfdetermination and expect investments in Affordable Housing, Small Business development, loans to lownext house holds, Renewable Energy and reducing student debt crisis. Sanfrancisco should lead the pact and this moves us closer to realizing the creation of a public bank. The legislation will engage key banking, fiscal and lending experts to a Planning Task force and bring on a consultant for the Business Plan which will come to the boards consideration is approval. I am so appreciative of the San FranciscoPublic Bank Coalition for their ongoing advocacy and our state policy makers for passing landmark legislation. Thank you also to the treasurer for the work his office did on the Feasibility Study and for being willing to engage with my office on this issue and thank you to my colleagues who are cosponsored this, supervisor walton, ronan, brown and all of you, i like forward through this legislation that we have taking the nex necktie next step. Tout the resthe rest i submit. Supervisor hainey. I introduced legislation to extend justcause extensions to New Buildings here in San Francisco following up on Assembly Member chus 482. This allows us to extend just cause protections ending what can still be arbitrary evictions on buildings not covered under our rent ordinance, including ones that were built over the last 15 years, which member chus legislation did not cover and im introducing substitute legislation today to add an additional piece, an important piece to this legislation and with the new rent cap, new cap on rent increases, statewide and the expanded eviction protections, theres been a spike in evictions as landlords seek to evic evict tenants befot goes into effect. Others have responded with eviction moratoriums to protect tenants before the new law goes into effect and today im introducing our new version of emergency eviction and substitute legislation to the justcause expansion and the emergency protections effectively make eviction protections retroactive for some tenants and protect tenants during the vulnerable transition period. I want to thank supervisors fewer and ronan who are cosponsoring this and i look forward to protecting people immediately and have this moving forward. The rest i submit. Thank you. Mr. President , seeing no other names, that concludes the introduction of new business. Then, lets go on to item 38, Public Comment . At this time, the public may not address the entire board of supervisors up to two minutes on the subject matter of jurisdiction matters of the board to include the minutes from october 8th, 2019 and items 3942. Please direct your remarks to the board as a whole and not to individual members. If you would like to display a document on the overhead projector, please state such to sfgov tv and remove the document when you would like the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. Global Climate Change should be infused in all of our planning. I would say one small step was the passage of proposition f which i gather will be the law of the land, which will make it harder for developers to have undue influence on the planning process. That will help. I want to i got ten seconds here and i want to say once again we know as Global Climate temperatures go up, it has an increasing effect and it builds on itself and physical factors that are driving that. But the third and the biggest problem of causing Global Climate increase as temperatures go up is how humans respond to it. We seem to be responding to it by a great deal i did hear there would be 200 units of Senior Housing available. And that area maam, maam, were pausing your time. The president has a message for you. Ok. That item has had Public Comment. The second thing was on the item that was brought up on i have brain damage, but the housing i think it had to do with im not supposed to mention individuals but it was my former supervisor and i was promised ten years ago, when i was placed in transitional housing at the hotel. Next speaker. Im a cab driver and i come again to see you guys today. I drive taxi cab. I have stroke like long time ago. I have very bad pain. And id i dont know how im surviving. I make a plea to you to please help. Good afternoon. Hes too weak to walk and hes disabled. Theres still three hours waiting at the airport for lyft is we cannot survive. We are expressing this situation and we are in misery. This did not happen and they have to consensus. This is a real hardship. Moneymaking as a cab driver. It you havyou have to respect wa lot of points. You heard everybody, what they said