Yes. Thank you very much for your comments and reports. Item 6, proposed Commission Rules to provide an administrative appeal in certain disciplinary cases. Deputy City Attorney brad russi to provide an overview. Thank you very much. Welcome, mr. Russi. I know that the commission has information in their doc ketskets, with that, in terms of item six, do you wish to proceed . Sure. Good morning commissioners and good morning chief. We have two items that relate to disciplinary process. Ill talk about the first one first. The as you know, the disciplinary process is laid out in the citys charter, which is sort of like the citys constitution. In a lawsuit about a year and a half ago, the court of appeals found that with respect to a police case, that the citys disciplinary process laid out in the charter does not fully comply with state law. So for members of the Fire Department, there is an annalgus provision of state law that would apply, meaning there is provision for members of the Fire Department as well. So what you have before you in terms of the first item is our administrative rules actually, let me explain first. The legal vulnerability with the charter provision is that there is not an administrative appeal offered following the commissions final decision in a case that involves the discipline of more than 10 days. So what state law requires is that for the citys final decision in a disciplinary case involving a member of the Police Department or the Fire Department, there needs to be an opportunity for the member to aply appeal that decision. Our current charter provision requires that where a chief is seeking discipline of more than 10 days suspension, up until dismissal, that the chief file the charges before the commission, and the commission makes the final decision. We dont presently have an appeal to that decision. The member would need to go directly to court to challenge it. The administrative rules that we put together for you in item number six would provide that the nobody has an opportunity to appeal the commissions final decision to an Administrative Law judge, who would be employed by the office of administrative hearings, which is a state agency. The city has a contract already with that department, with that state agency. And these rules mirror rules that the Police Commission adopted to provide an interim solution to resolve this problem for the Police Department. So they went through the entire commission process, they met and conferred with the Police Officers association, and these are very similar, if not exactly the same, to the rules that are applied to the Police Department. And so with respect to this first item, the commission would we would recommend that the commission adopt these rules, subject to meet and confer with the affected unions. Im available to answer any questions about that. Thank you very much, commissioner veranissi. Im sorry, Vice President covington . Thank you, mr. President. I move that we adopt the rules for administrative appeals as submitted by our City Attorney. Thank you for that motion. And im going to have commissioner ve veranisi at this particular time. I had a quick question because i was on the Police Commission for a little bit, and i saw how that second appeal was used to delay matters, and i dont want to get into a situation because i think our current system, while it is broken and needs to be fixed, by adding that second layer on that is a Legal Process caused years and years of delay on disciplinary cases. And we had cases caught up in appeals, and it was always a threat, oh, were just going to take it to an Administrative Law judge, and they ended up doing that, and i had cases that went on for years that i never saw the end of because of that. So i just had a quick question. The issue is that the person being charged doesnt have an administrative appeal remedy, right . On the cases that go directly to the commission. So what occurred in the Court Decision was that the court found that state law required the piece officer personnelpeaceofficer pt requires an administrative appeal from the citys final decision in the disciplinary matter. Im not sure what youre referring to specifically to your time on the Police Commission because this is a new thing that the Police Commission adopted in the last year and a half or so. I think there still may be a provision of the rules that apply to the Police Disciplinary cases, that allows there to be an outside officer that hear those cases. This is different. These rules provide that there is a timeline set out so the member has to file the appeal within 30 days of the commissions final decision, and there are timelines for the Briefing Schedule and when the hearing has to happen. I think this wont be dragged out as long as from what youre referring to with your time on the Police Commission but these rules are new within the last two years. Okay. Couldnt with fix the problem by as long as were doing a Charter Amendment, right, we might as well look at this thing holistically and try to fix it with the input of the union, of course. But couldnt we fix the problem by allowing giving the chief the final decision and then having the administrative appeal come to the commission for a final hearing, as opposed to going to an outside body of which we have no control over . Right. And that is the solution that were proposing in the second item that relates to this issue of the Charter Amendment. But the recommendation of my office is for purposes of the interim solution, and i dont know whether it is in the power of the commission to delegate had authority to the chief. Right. Because the charter already provides that the chief makes the recommendation to the commission, and the Commission Holds the trial and issues a decision in a manner that is more than 10 days but since were changing the charter, cant we just fix the problem there . For the next item that is under consideration, youre recommendation what the Commission Wants to see in the potential Charter Amendment, that is the solution. Okay. That would be presented to the board of supervisors, and if the board wants to put it on the bullet, then t ballot, thene voters. It is an interim solution until the charter can be amended. Got it. Thank you for that clarification. Thank you very much, commissioner. Commissioner cleveland . Thank you, brad, for your report. Just a quick question has local sub 98 signed off on this . Or they will review it once the commission has approved it . Basically, as i said, the motion i dont know whether commissioner covington said this in her motion, but it should be adopted subject to the meet and confer. So if they want to meet, the city would do that. And if the city agrees to any changes, then the rules would come back to the commission for a final adoption. Thank you. On that note, i will second Vice President covingtons motion to approve these interim rules. There has been a motion and a second. Did you need Vice President covington to make clarity on that motion . As the City Attorney had said in his statements, it would involve meet and confer with the unions. So i have now said it as well. All right. Thank you very much. Is there any call for Public Comment . Public comment on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners, are you ready to vote. All in favor, say yea. Yea. Okay, item seven. Item seven, potential Charter Amendment concerning Fire Department disciplinary process. Continuing the same discussion, we separated it. As you all know, the city charter is sort of like the constitution that governs the City Government. In order to cheque it change itt requires that the changes go on the ballot and the voters to approve it by a majority vote. In order to get something on the ballot, the board of supervisors has to place it there by a vote of six or more members of the board. The purpose of bringing this forward for you all to consider today is to, i guess, express your agreement, if this is how you would like to see the charter changed. The proposal that we put forward, which the chief has reviewed, would allow the chief to make the final disciplinary decision in all matters. So the way it works now is the chief can impose discipline up to 10 days, and for those up to 10day decisions, the members have a right to appeal. But anything over 10 days, the chief files charges with the commission, sort of like a recommendation to the commission on what discipline to impose. The change would allow the chief to make the final disciplinary decision in all matters, and there would be an appeal to the commission in all matters, the right to appeal. The member wouldnt have to appeal, but the member has a right to appeal to the commission, in all matters from oneday suspension up until termination. This seems to be the most simple way to solve the problem. So if you all recommend that this is what you want to see, or if you have changes, you can propose them, and i can make changes to the language in the proposal. But if youre happy with what you see before you, then the recommendation would be that you move to recommend that the board of supervisors consider this Charter Amendment. Thank you very much. One more comment, the Police Commission can they considered changes to their provisions of the charter and they actually approved the language. Their situation is a little more complicated than whats before the Fire Commission because they have a separate department, a department of police accountability, that has a role in discipline regarding Police Officers. Theyve come up with a somewhat more complicated solution. All right. Call for Public Comment on this item, number seven . Any member of the public who wishes to give Public Comment at this time . Seeing none, the Public Comment is closed. Commissioners, any discussions or questions at this particular point . Commissioner veranianisi. Sorry about that, commissioner cleveland. Thank you, mr. President , and mr. Russi, i appreciate and applaud your work on this Charter Amendment. And i would like to move to approve it. Thank you very much. Commissioner veranissi . Veranisi. I just want to clay what these changes are. Sometimes it can be a little confusing. The first page is the om only page that applies to the Fire Department, and the rest is all police stuff, right . Correct. The effect of this is i want to see, of course, if the chief sports this, because it is important for me to know whether or not she supports this, but the affect of this is that the commission will not see all cases brought directly to it, it will go to the fire chief, this chief or the next chief or whoever it is, and that may increase her load, correct . Well, the chief has a role in all disciplinary matters, regardless of whether she has to fill discipline so it is not going to increase the cases that go before her. That is good. It will decrease the cases that goes before us, which i guess is good. But it alt also takes the authority away on determination cases unless they are appealed through the chief . Thats right. We dont know whether it is necessarily going to reduce the case load for the commission. It may be that every member appeals their suspension up to 10 days, which would be cases you would have heard under the current system. But this gives every member to appeal any case, whether it is a oneday suspension or twoday suspension, so it could increase, theoretically, our case load . Well, you would only hear appeals. The way the charter works now, members anything under 10 days is an appeal. The chief can make the final decision, and the member decides whether or not they want to appeal. Were just expanding that to all discipline in order to address the state law. Im curious, and i think the number is pretty high. The number of cases that historically that have been brought to the chief for less than 10day suspension, are those historically all appealed . Because we saw a pretty high case load at one point. Im wondering what this will do to our case load. Nope. Its not . Nope. Im trying to get into this eyes wide open. Ill second the motion. And i should have also mentioned in my presentation that this the city must also meet and confer with the affected unions prior to placing this on the ballot. So there will be an opportunity for leeward to have a say. It is already too late to get this on the november 2019 ballot, but there are two elections next year, so there is still time for march 2020 and time for nov 202 november 20 as well. Commissioner veranisi, thank you. Commissioners, i call for the question, all in favor say yea. Yea. Any opposed . None. Madam secretary. Im 8, commission report, report on Commission Activities since last meeting on june 26,. At this time, are there any reports or updates from the commissioners . The only thing i want to duly note to you, commissioners, recently we have attempted to coordinate an activities calendar from the commissioners, in the sense that various commissioners make requests to the Chiefs Office or to the or even to the Commission Secretary. We would like to have this a little more centralized so there is a coordination, again. We have a new secretary for the Chiefs Office that im not quite sure many of you met yet. Teresa nutawit, who is the new secretary for the Chiefs Office as well. The spirit of this is a cooperative spirit in terms of continuing communications with the commissioners office. I just would like to make that gesture in terms of continuing that coordination. I dont know if we really got off into creating the activity calendar, but the attempt is certainly going to be something that were trying to accomplish. If there are no other questions or comments on this at this time commissioner veranisi . I dont understand why the activities calendar means. Are you saying if there is something you would like the department to participate in, we would communicate not with yourself and the Commission Secretary and the chief, but go directly to the chiefs secretary . No. Im trying to have it centralized that where our activities are at least centralized with the commissions office. At various times there are requests that we make as commissioners, maybe perhaps to the Chiefs Office, that the Commission Secretary is not aware of, nor am i aware of as president. Im only president for this term that is remaining, but the spirit of this is to have some kind of communication and coordination through the commissions secretary, of activities that were doing. Again, it is upon your discretion in terms of submitting that kind of information or requests. Sometimes we get requests that im not aware of, or the secretarys office is not aware of, and were just trying to centralize it in terms of cooperation. Are you saying you would like the communications to go to our Commission Secretary . Because there was a mention of the chiefs secretary to our secretary, hoping that the coordination through our secretary, the commissions secretary, will be a coordination between the Chiefs Office as well so that we are having some coordination and communication. And weve done this unofficially, looking at some best practice implementation upon the discretion of the president. And we have rotating collective leadership in this commission. So im just suggesting that now, as we move along, for the remained of this term. All right, madam secretary . Public comment on that commissioner report . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Item 9, agenda for next and future Fire Commission meetings. I enjoy the different individual reports through your deputy chief. I think that the report, when chief ravarro gave his report was really, really helpful. I believe this mornings report by chief tong was very wellreceived, and it gives an opportunity for us, as the commissioners, to have your individual command force do a presentation and verbalize. Within that spirit, upon your discretion, maybe this is a great opportunity to ask the fire marshal to maybe look at an updated presentation in terms of what is currently occurring within your area as well. I know there ar is a lot in your report, but at different times, perhaps you would like to have your colleagues within the command force be able to verbalize it as well. For us, as a commission, it gets us in touch with the individual chiefs. And thank you very much, chief tong, for this morning, because many of us have not had the opportunity as you ascend yourself in this position. And upon the discretion of chief nickelson and chief decasio, whether or not in is feasible at all. Thank you, president. That is absolutely feasible. We just need to be mindful of i think the next Commission Meeting is the chase center scenario. So im not sure if youre going to be closely involved with that. Yeah. So maybe we could do it in a month. Yeah, you can go under operations thank you very much. I think thats within the spirit of not taking the various chiefs out of order, but really working that as a collaboration between operation report and administration report. It just enhances materials as well, as other various components of the department. It is just good and healthy for the commission to be able to have interaction with the various chiefs, and whoever else this Commission Wants us to call on. All right. Public comment on this . No Public Comment. Commissioners comment . I have one quick question the commission has the obligation to do an annual review, i believe, of two employees, correct, the chief and one of the doctors . The doctors physicians office. And when do the reviews come up . I believe those are the only two. And the Commission Secretary. Right. There is an annual calendar that usually occurs in the Commission Secretary im not sure about the physician, but there is an annual basis we work off of. As far as the chiefs appraisal went, it was always started through the Mayors Office and d. P. H. They would send out the forms to get that started. And do all three of them happen at the same time . No. No. No . In terms of the commission, except for the chief. And in terms of the Commission Secretary, i think it was the last i believe the last time was in review of the past president at that time. At that time, i believe commissioner cleveland was president of the commission, and we agreed upon that evaluation being handled by the president of the commission at that particular time. Okay. Just so that our jurisdiction is covered. And dr. Torazo as well . Yes. I think upon your questioning, we can try to make that schedule. The one thing for me is that we work closely with the chief and maureen, but i dont know the doctor. And the only time he ever appears in front of us is when he does the annual review, and thats kind of a weird situation. The reason i bring this up is i would like, perhaps, some sort of presentation to what he is doing and how he is doing it, or what the state of the department, the health of the department is. Thats kind of his job. So that our only interaction with him is not our appraisal with him. I recollect that you brought up these comments prevly, spreviously, so we do he it under our discretion to bring the good doctor in for a summary update. And i asked the question last time in terms of daytoday supervision, and i believe it is under chief ellis office, just so we have that kind of oversight. In terms of jurisdiction oversight, it is us. And we could call the good doctor up on some timely matter. I think we can check with the Commission Secretary. I will, as to when he last appeared, which wasnt too long ago. I think the last time he appeared for us was permission to obtain secondary employment. It wasnt the actual review. So it could have been a year ago. I dont want the first time i see him to be the time that were doing his appraisal. Duly noted, commissioner. I will work with the Commission Secretary to put that up at some timely manner in the future. All right. Any other comment, Public Comment, commissioners . Madam secretary. May i just yes. Thank you, president. I just received an email from d. H. R. About the employee appraisal report, so ill get that to you. Okay. Thank you very much, chief nickelson. Madam secretary . Item 10, a adjournment. I need a motion. It is seconded. This meeting is adjourned. Everything is done inhouse. I think it is done. I have always been passionate about gelato. Every single slaver has its own recipe. We have our own we move on from there. So you have every time a unique experience because that slaver is the flavored we want to make. Union street is unique because of the neighbors and the location itself. The people that live around here i love to see when the street is full of people. It is a little bit of italy that is happening around you can walk around and enjoy shopping with gelato in your hand. This is the move we are happy to provide to the people. I always love union street because its not like another commercial street where you have big chains. Here you have the neighbors. There is a lot of stories and the neighborhoods are essential. People have they enjoy having their daily or weekly gelato. I love this street itself. We created a move of an area where we will be visiting. We want to make sure that the area has the gelato that you like. What we give back as a shop owner is creating an ambient lifestyle. If you do it in your area and if you like it, then you can do it on the streets you like. All ri 2, 1 you innovation on or was on over 200 years they went through extensive innovations to the existing green new metal gates were installed our the perimeter 9 project is funded inform there are no 9 Community Opportunity and our Capital Improvement plan to the 2008 clean and safe neighborhood it allows the residents and park advocates like san franciscans to make the matching of the few minutes through the philanthropic dungeons and finished and finally able to pull on play on the number one green a celebration on october 7, 1901, a skoovlt for the st. Anthonys formed a club and john then the superintendent the Golden Gate Park laid out the Bowling Green are here sharing meditates a permanent green now and then was opened in 1902 during the course the 1906 San Francisco earthquake that citywide much the city the greens were left that with an ellen surface and not readers necessarily 1911 it had the blowing e bowling that was formed in 1912 the Parks Commission paid laying down down green number 2 the San Francisco lawn club was the first opened in the United States and the oldest on the west their registered as San Francisco lark one 101 and ti it is not all fierce competition food and good ole friend of mine drive it members les lecturely challenge the stories some may be true some not memories of past winners is reversed presbyterian on the wall of champions. Make sure you see the one in to the corner thats me and. No . Not bingo or scrabble but the pare of todays competition two doreen and christen and beginninger against robert and others easing our opponents for the stair down is a pregame strategy even in lawn bowling. Play ball. Yes. Almost. clapping . The size of tennis ball the object of the game our control to so when the players on both sides are bold at any rate the complete ends you do do scoring it is youll get within point lead for this bonus first of all, a jack can be moved and a or picked up to some other point or move the jack with i have a goal behind the just a second a lot of elements to the game. Were about a yard long. Aim a were not player ill play any weighed see on the inside in the goal is a minimum the latter side will make that arc in im righthand side i play my for hand and to my left if i wanted to acre my respect i extend so it is arced to the right have to be able to pray both hands. clapping. who one. Nice try and hi, im been play lawn bowling affair 10 years after he retired i needed something to do so i picked up this paper and in this paper i see in there play lawn bowling in San FranciscoGolden Gate Park ever since then ive been trying to bowl i enjoy bowling a very good support and good experience most of you have of of all love the peoples and have a lot of have a lot of few minutes in mr. Mayor the San Francisco play lawn bowling is in Golden Gate Park were sharing meadow for more information about the club including free lessons log hi. My name is carmen chiu, San Franciscos elected assessor. When i meet with seniors in the community, theyre thinking about the future. Some want to down size or move to a new neighborhood thats closer to family, but they also worry that making such a change will increase their property taxes. Thats why i want to share with you a property tax saving program called proposition 60. So how does this work . Prop 60 was passed in 1986 to allow seniors who are 55 years and older to keep their prop 13 value, even when they move into a new home. Under prop 13 law, property growth is limited to 2 growth a year. But when ownership changes the law requires that we reassess the value to new market value. Compared to your existing home, which was benefited from the which has benefited from the prop 13 growth limit on taxable value, the new limit on the replacement home would likely be higher. Thats where prop 60 comes in. Prop 60 recognizes that seniors on fixed income may not be able to afford higher taxes so it allows them to carryover their existing prop 13 value to their new home which means seniors can continue to pay their prop 13 tax values as if they had never moved. Remember, the prop 60 is a one time tax benefit, and the Property Value must be equal to or below around your replacement home. If you plan to purchase your new home before selling your existing home, please make sure that your new home is at the same price or cheaper than your existing home. This means that if your existing home is worth 1 million in market value, your new home must be 1 million or below. If youre looking to purchase and sell within a year, were you nur home must not be at a value that is worth more than 105 of your exist egging home. Which means if you sell your old home for 1 million, and you buy a home within one year, your new home should not be worth more than 1. 15 million. If you sell your existing home at 1 million and buy a replacement between year one and two, it should be no more than 1. 1 million. Know that your ability to participate in this Program Expires after two years. You will not be able to receive prop 60 tax benefits if you cannot make the purchase within two years. So benefit from this tax savings program, you have to apply. Just download the prop 60 form from our website and submit it to our office. For more, visit our website, sfassessor. Org, in november of 2016, california voters passed proposition 64. The adult use of marijuana act. San franciscans overwhelmingly approved it by nearly 75 . And the law went into effect in january of 2018. [ ] under californias new law, adults age 21 and over can legally possess up to 1 ounce of cannabis and grow up to six plants at home. Adults in california can legally give up to 1 ounce to other adults. In the state of california, we passed a law that said adult consumption is legal. If you are an adult and in possession of certain amounts, you will no longer be tried. You will not be arrested or prosecuted for that. That is changing the landscape dramatically. [ ] to legalization of cannabis could bring tremendous economic and social benefits to cities like San Francisco. This industry is projected to reach 22 billion by the year 2020. And that is just a few years away. It can be a huge Legal Industry in california. I think very shortly, the actual growing of marijuana may become the biggest cash crop in the state and so you want that to be a legal tax paying cash crop, all the way down the line to a sales tax on the retail level. The california medical industry is a 3 billiondollar industry last year. Anticipating that multiplier as 20, 30, 50 times in the consumer marketplace once adult use is really in place, you could go ahead and apply that multiplier to revenue. It will be huge. When that underground economy becomes part of the regular tax paying employment economy of the bay area, it not only has a direct impact, that money has a ripple impact through the economy as well. It is not just about retail. It is not just about the sensor. Is about manufacturing pick a lot of innovative manufacturing is happening here in San Francisco in addition to other parts of the state as well as the cultivation. We should be encouraging that. There is a vast array of jobs that are going to be available in the newly regulated cannabis industry. You can start at the top tier which a scientist working in testing labs. Scientists working at extraction companies. And you work towards agricultural jobs. You have ones that will require less education and you look towards Cannabis Retail and see traditional retail jobs and you see general management jobs. Those things that are similar to working at a Bar Restaurant or working at a retail store. We are offering, essentially, high paid manufacturing jobs. Typical starting wage of 18 20 an hour, almost no barrier to entry, you do not need an education. That means that people who do not have college educations, workingclass people, will have an opportunity to have a job at cultivating cannabis plants. Theres a whole wide array of Job Opportunities from the seedling to the sale of the cannabis. [ ] last year, they said 26 Million People came to San Francisco. The Tourism Industry continues to be very robust here and the city and county of San Francisco is about a billiondollar industry. If we use a conservative cannabis user Adoption Rate to 15 that means 4 million tourists want that means 4 million tourists want to purchase cannabis. And we need to be ready for th them. In 2015, as adult use legalization efforts gained momentum in california, the supervisors created the San FranciscoCannabis State Legalization Task force. This task force offered to research and advice to the supervisors, the mayor and other city departments. We knew that adult use legalization was coming to the ballot and stat that would bring with it a number of decisions that the city would have to make about zoning and regulation and so forth. And i decided at that time, at a know it was a great, that rather than have a fire drill after the ballot measure passes, as suspected it would, we should plan an event. So i authored a task force to spend a year studying it and we made it a broadbased task force. We prepared ourselves by developing a Health Impact assessment and partnered that with key stakeholder discussions with washington, oregon, colorado, to really learn lessons from their experience rolling out both adult and medicinal cannabis. Within days of the passing of the proposition, ed lee called on agencies to act decisively. He issued an executive order asking the department of public health, along with planning and other city departments to think through an internal working group around what we needed to do to consider writing this law. We collectively, i would say that was representatives from g. S. A. , as well as the Mayors Office, met with a lot of departments to talk through what prop 64 and the implementation of prop 64 it meant to them. The mayor proposed an office of cannabis, a onestop shop for permits allowing operators to grow and sell cannabis. He wanted a smart structure. He wanted a regulatory structure that ensured that kids didnt have access and communitys were safe and that consumers were safe. And he wanted to ensure, more importantly, it was a regulatory structure that encouraged diversity and inclusivity. This is an office that will be solely charged with a duty of wanting not only the policies that we create, implementing and enforcing them, but also executing the licenses that are needed. Were talking about 20 different licenses that will put us into compliance with what is happening on the state level. This is a highly, highly regulated industry now, at this point. We have anywhere from 710 departments that will be working with these industry participants as they go through the permitting process. That is a lot of work at a loss of coordination. We are creating a permitting process that is smart and is digital. It is much easier for the user and for community input, and is less mired in bureaucracy. For the First Time Ever in San Francisco history, standalone licenses are available for all aspects of the nonretail side of the cannabis industry. Now, a cultivator can go in to the department of building inspection and to the department of health and say, with this first registered and temporary license, and then what will eventually be a permanent license, this is the project, this is what i am going to do. Very rarely in City Government do we interact with industries that are asking to be regulated. These guys want to be regulated. They want to be compliant. They want to work with the city. That is rare. San francisco has created a temporary licensing process so that the preexisting operators here in San Francisco can apply for a temporary state licensed. We have taken teams of up to 12 inspectors to inspect the facility twice a day. We have been doing that with the department of building inspection and the department of public health. And the Fire Department. It is really important for the industry to know that we are treating them like industry. Like manufacturing. Like coworkers pick so that is the way we are approaching this from a health and safety and a Consumer Protection network. This is just the way practice happens with restaurants or manufacturing facilities. Because there are so many pieces of industry that people havent even thought about. There are different permits for each piece. You have to set up a permitting system for growing, for manufacturing, for testing. For delivery. For retail. You have to make sure that there is an appropriate health code. Certainly the regulation of alcohol in terms of restaurants and retail its probably a model for how this industry will be regulated as well, both on sale and consumption. It is completely uncharted territory. There is a blessing and a curse with that. It is exciting because we are on a new frontier, but it is very nerveracking because theres a lot at stake. And quite frankly, being San Francisco, being the state of california, people are looking to us. We hope that cannabis does become more of an accepted part of society in the same way that alcohol is, the same way coffee is. It is a very innovative fear, particularly around manufacturing. San francisco could be an epicenter. San francisco can be a leader here. A Global Leader in the Cannabis Movement and set a bar just to other communities and cities and states and this nation how it is done. Done. Good morning and welcome to the San Francisco county Transportation Authority for today, tuesday, july 9th, 2019 mr. Clark, please call the role. [roll call]