Those are lines we can come up with better language. It will apply to ellis act evicts that are noticed today and if the ellis act once ellis act is trirgd when i the owner than a period of x number of years youll not been able to add the adu that was 5 years in the shortterm rentals into supervisor campos and supervisor farrell proposed. Yes. It was 5 years. It was 5 years in both of the legislation. My recollection of the condo lottery i think 5 years maybe 10 years for the length of the band if ive done awning ellis act i thought that was permanent if youre a senior disabled evicted under the ellis act i cant recall with certainty. All right. Thank you very much seeing none next is supervisor christensen. Thank you i certainly appreciate the concerns as i said niagara anything we do deserves a lot of scrutiny by i hear supervisor kim some of your concern is currently covered by restriction such as a shortterm rentals some of it is not an immediate issue in case of catalytic i hope we can address the immediate issues were about to hear on item after this one in which restrictions were passed years ago to respond to a particular condition the guidelines and changes to the Building Code were extremely narrow and extremely rigid and difficult to change what happened the circumstances changes but the regulations didnt we end up with restrictions that boxed us in as conditions changed over time this is something were in an interesting juncture were looking at where we will be in 5, 1015 years i want to marry this is reasonably enforced we leave enough room for changes to come some of the changes were worried about are either covered legally or probably not likely to happen one thing supervisor kim you and i share our district have the greatest difference in transmittals i have a lot of small cottages but we say highrises we talked to Property Owners addressed Planning Department the absorptions that most of those changes are likely to occur in the corridors p there are last year building stockton and pine and bush sutter those types of areas and you know the Telegraph Hill for example the residential units that are less likely to be effected probably and so weve generally tried to focus on making sure this work for a larger apartment buildings we feel in the district is most likely to our and use of units are probably less significant than they might be lets say if this is applied to the we were western neighborhoods. Thank you supervisor kim. I want to proficient or presented but dont want to treat attendance different i didnt support one legislation my concern with adu is around the ability for hoernz and Property Owners to be in the system and Property Owners id like to hear more about that maybe the department of building inspection can walk through how theyre assigned an address and in that arena id like to hear about that in the meantime i suggest i think i want to keep the amendment with amendment number 2 anl evictions any incision to be that we prohibit the construction of adus in any building where the taenltsz are displaced by the ellis act in the last 10 years sorry for 10 years not 5 now i want to keep anothers retrofit tilt over the week we decide donate not illegal permissible or questionable next he monday well bring it back as ms. Burns School District i dont agree we can be retrofit and up to 10 years weve done it already so my motion ill make my motion for the second piece prohibiting the construction of adus for tenants that have been displaced by the ellis act for 10 years. Lets go motion by motion. Thats referred to a motion youve heard the motion by supervisor kim any further discussion. Supervisor wiener. If the eviction as outdoor within 10 years with the adu is applied for im not sure what the 10 years is for. You cant constrict an adu for 10 years. After an ellis act eviction and after an ellis act restriction. Ill support that in terms of retrofit activity i assume well get size from the City Attorney my understanding we typically have not mating made a retrofit but the supervisors daily and others that are clearly no friends of the ellis act and so i think theres a legal reason for that i want to make sure we know that this legislation will hold up in court so the deputy City Attorney well get legal advice. Thank you deputy City Attorney mirena burns dactylothrough the chair the reason for prospective not retrofit noted punitive on people that wouldnt have known there is a restriction if they ellis acted their units. Through the chair i believe there is legislation weve promoted that retroactively but during the week well explore it. Well take that without objection. That motion passes all right. Supervisor kim could i make our second. Sure my second motion is actually just literally lifting this permissible provision from supervisor chiu which is to lgbt adus or requiring adus to be permanently maintained as right lanes for individual sale. Any financial discussion. So that amendment is a little bit different than before i assumed this to be a band on the entering the condo lottery through the chair sxm is the amendment also to say that an owner cant reside in one of the adus it has to be rented. No, im sorry it is a conversion of units to ownership i see what youre saying if the owner moves in theyll own the unit ill clarify to prohibit the condominium conversion or fractional ownership through a separate owner. As the reasons ive stated ill not support in amendment i dont think it is a good idea to take one class of buildings and a as theyre treating it different weve scaled back the condo lottery back to lifetime in the were going to tell owners in addition to the owners the money to build an adu well permanent band this building from the condo lottery is not the right direction. Ill be voting for this amendment and probably have a different mindset supervisor wiener i believe that all the housing unit we shouldnt be treating all rh1 and rh2 housing equally they are different ava different sdorn so ill be supporting that. To the deputy City Attorney this will cause both pieces of legislation referred to the Planning Commission am i correct. Yes. My understanding the Planning Commission didnt consider this. My request then to supervisor cowen or the maker is this could be introduced as trailing legislation so this is not referred to the Planning Commission one thing to a continuance but take this away from the board to the Planning Commission and basically restart the process from skach i would ask we not go down that road. I dont have a problems are supporting that as trailer legislation and yeah. Duplicating the file and send on amended version back to the Planning Department on this motion. Deputy City Attorney mirena burns you can introduce separate legislation. Id like to did you want the file and all the time one. Its my understanding we can do that. So lets take a vote on just mr. Clerk as a point of clarification take the vote and duplication the file and theres no need to take a vote on duplication that can happen within the request. Okay all right. Thank you very much our i think were clear on the motion before us lets do a roll call vote on the second motion supervisor kim and a. And a motion to amend the condo on the duplicate version not on the primer version. Thats correct. Did you get that mr. Clerk and the original version without the amendment number one will be duplicate and then well propose an amendment number 2 to the duplicate file and take a vote at this time. Thats correct. Roll call vote please. On amendment 2 supervisor wiener arrest no. Supervisor kim supervisor cohen that motion passes. The dial is duplicate and back to the Planning Commission and the other mr. Will move forward supervisor kim ask you introduce. The final will be to prohibit the adu from shortterm rentals. Any further discussion on this okay. Lets call a roll call vote on this. On amendments to amendment number 3 on that motion supervisor wiener no supervisor kim supervisor cowen that motion passes. The that motion passes. Im sorry was that on the that was on the both versions because that didnt have to go back to the Planning Commission. My understanding on the original version with amendment number one and now political amendment 3 to that one. Ms. Burdens burns can you answer supervisor wiener and thats correct they had that hearing multiple times. All right. Mr. Clerk can you please call item no. 7 please. Actually we have to act on the other line item say that again. We have to act on that item to the deputy City Attorney do those two amendments require a continuance to the land use commission. Yes. Regarding the ellis act they require another hearing. So i make a motion to continue items five and six one week. All right. Mansion made without objection. Im sorry the 5 and 6 for the unduplicate version and motion to table for one week. Continue. Continue items five and six that motion passes. And on the duplicate portion. Make a motion to the Planning Commission and weve referred to the Planning Commission. Well refer to planning. Well take that without objection. That motion passes. Mr. Clerk call number 7. Item 7 on amending the planning code to amend an restaurant or bar in the special integrity to open with the conditional use authorization provided that it meets purview to the Planning DepartmentEnvironmental Impact determination and making finding with the general plan. Thank you sxhiefshgs is the author of that item supervisor christensen the floor is yours. So that is one the restrictive situations weve talked about a large prominent location in north beach thats been vacant for 11 years it has been determined one of the reasons some of the use restrictions that are Police Station on that we think about changing those but in this case weve decided the benching best thing to a amend that and we have proposed and gotten an agreement with the Planning Commission to addresses this lot separately weve got a beloved neighborhood our local mommas restaurant is poepd to create a second restaurant in a specialist take out location there were very excited weve received overwhelming support from the indications that the neighborhood and altering another merchant welcome this the site is a blight unlisted and not having someone around it everybody is excited it in an active use in the hopes that will increases the business traffic to the surrounding businesses this was heard by the Small Business commission and they made a couple of recommendations im happy to include and if i can ask supervisor wiener assistance in this they have suggested we strike bar from restaurant and bar and on this use a restaurant we have a continuance business is allowed to occupy this space and they ask we change that from a business and Continuous Operation from one to 5 years so if the committee will accept those recommendations then ill put this for the for your approval. Supervisor christensen has made amendments before we vote we want to take Public Comment on this item please members of the public please come up for. Hi, im kevin with the Planning Department staff can i get the overhead. Im sorry, i didnt know that we had a staff presentation. For just by way of orientation this as map of the various special use districts that apply not north beach area the north beach special use district the subject of the discussion today is old in the black and yellow line ill trace here as you can see it rinses primarily along the columbus avenue and grand avenue frontals within north beach along the commercial properties as indicated this would be an amendment to the north beach sud regulations that are currently bring in a restaurant and bar that was previously occupied by service this is the case at the location proposed for that the second mommas restaurant on vallejo street that applies to two other properties provided they meet criteria so as amended this could only be amended noted by supervisor christensen the existing restaurant would have to operate within the neighborhood for 5 of the last 5 years the proposed location for a second operation will have to be a ground level measure 5 thousand square feet and vacant for more than 15 months and 40 percent of the psychiatrist set aside for noncommercial uses that is the Neighborhoods Service intent and the proposal consistent wtd general policies and planning the planning code and provide a intellectual benefit to the neighborhood and it will be considered through the conditional use authorization for individual users that might cocome forward and that cu been considered by the Planning Commission in terms of the legislation on june 4th the Planning Commission recommended approval the memento amendment and approve the ccii on vallejo street and the Small Business commission recommend the amendments so this that concludes my presentation. Im available to answer any questions thank you. Thank you so youre here for Public Comment. Yes. Im Vince Sanchez part of family who is operated mommas on Washington Square our parents michael and francis theyve been in business since 1951 on the corner of stockton and part of the north Beach Community for 64 years it is a very popular restaurants theyve line up daily from two to two notch hours that was the line for looking at 627 when the Small Business community educating less than bringing this to our attention 627 fits our plans we understood that was a always some concerns in the neighborhood we listened to everybody that came up with a concept little mommas grocery is unique to the ear in listening to the concerns and to the overwhelming supporter from the get go it become apparent quickly that had we not had the supports right from the beginning we with would stepped away if this were going on 33 judges weve valued our time and the money weve expended on the project the concept is unique and 627 as the the code reads will not be rented again not said it is not feasible for Grocery Stores e. R. Hardware stores it is a building that time has changed and part because of technology a ton of xheefgs to walgreens sea trade joes and smaller markets little mommas is the right place at this time thank you. My name is nick sanchez a member of the thirdgeneration to be involved in mommas the overwhelming population if my cousin and i will a part of north beach to carry on the legacy that began with our grandparents and conditioned with uncle mike and aunt deb that will be a business known for its food and telling him as benefits of the north beach neighborhood we do so i ask you to please join us and the rest the City Committee members to pass this thank you very much. Good afternoon kathy less than north Beach Business Association our association is here to support this legislation we think it is a great use of a difficult to fill space as mention before on the Small Business commission we recommended striving bar as parts part of it becomes vacant im sure we can agree we have enough bars in north beach and if the restaurant wants to go in theyll get an alcohol permit the other was the change to make it at least 5 years for a business to be in operation in north beach because im sure youre aware of we know that restaurants fail very easily we wanted to make sure it was like mommas a scholastic business last thick i didnt have a chance to review ill mention for the merchant 40 percent of the space that is vacant needs to be held by neighborhood serving business unfortunately, we reviewed that and saw a liquor store will quality were asking for a liquor store to be specifically prohibited from this legislation and then my final note is supervisor wiener you were very presumptionus and rude to say that things that involve our district are politically motivated this is our home and it is not politically motivated. Hi good afternoon, supervisors i want to share as a concerned citizen it is several years that building is is in north beach is entry you can bring positive change im here spending the last had hours to say im in supports of mommas in that second location. Good afternoon, supervisors my name is a ron lee im a residents of San Francisco all my life i grew up in north beach and you know it is just refreshing to know that mommas is going into that space its been entry for so many years im here in favor i support and pass this the tourists the neighborhoods and people of San Francisco wants mommas thats why the hours is two hours long waiting to have breakfast on the corner of filbert and stomg i hope you support this it will make that corner lively it is so dead a waste of space and it is really going to bring energy into north beach and it is good for everybody and good for tax basis for San Francisco we creates for programs to help whatever San Francisco needs thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker. Good afternoon, supervisors im sandy sue the location has been entry and wasted for more than 9 years please approve mom nasomass to create for jobs is good for communities communicate. Thank you under the circumstances. Hello, im here for Telegraph Hill im paul weber im supporting the passage of this legislation with the amendments prototype on by ms. Duly those are reasonable given the nature of the bars in north beach now we hope youll pass that with those Administration Modifications thank you. Next speaker. And. Good afternoon. Im jeremy the broker representing 627 in if transaction any family started the first real estate im not 90 but our company is and this property has been even competitiveable we continue to have the property on the website and a number of strip clubs and things like that uses that will not work clearly for north beach it is a the Police Family i find it outstanding that it is taken this long for this process to glow this is a family thats been around a long time and i think the supervisors should ask themselves why it has harmed the ability for Small Business to expands telling me they have the support of community and it is too restrictive and furthermore it is bad that theyve not been allowed to serve alcohol the exerts are serving alcohol it is harmful for some businesses to serve alcohol and not a nuance we could not ask for a Better Business in the city thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors im stephan im a arranged lobbyist in San Francisco im here on a pro bono simply as i sip my cappuccino and look at the voovr building i ask myself theres no theres no skews why this is vacant in the past or presents more needs to be vacant in the future i applaud supervisor christensen for taking the initiative to come up request a bridge that will allow something that the communities has completely enforced both as necessary of necessary and desirable to the area it will provide connectivity to bring about 5 hundred people a day to come to mommas and little mommas and maybe just maybe some of those folks will want to walk around the neighborhood and purchase some things from the retailers this us during lunch excuse me. Breakfast and lunchtime when we really need the foot traffic and for my own suspicious reasons i dont like to wait an hour ever half an hour because of mommas popularity and success it is