It was surprising to me that it has no protection and that in this vicinity there i think is potential for. There is a very significant building in this little neighborhood of russian hill, there is Great Potential for a district. But, so what do we, whats the general sense in terms of directing staff or Property Owner to do next. Commissioners johns . Thank you. So, the staff has recommended that this be subject to further study. I move that the staffs recommendation, be adopted, but i think the person who ought to take the laboring or doing the further study is the Property Owner. I will second the motion. We have a motion for further study and that would be looking in the confines of the district with the commissioner agreed that this building on its own does not rise to a level of significance to be an individual landmark. Not at this point i dont think it does. Of course there is always the possibility that this information could be developed. That is my feeling at this point. I think the Property Owner, the proponent always have the opportunity to do further research either to this building or other building or kolg coming to the hpc saying this is what we found and this is proposal and we can evaluate that proposal on the information that we have at that time. Okay. We have a motion. Do we have a second in we do. Thank you, there is no formal motion fee to adopt. Maybe for the file we can accommodate that consense through a letter. On that motion commissioners to direct the Property Owner to conduct further study, commissioner haas, yes, commissioner i johnck, commissioner johns, commissioner wolfram. That item passes 60. That leads us to item 10. Landmark designation work program. Good afternoon again. Commissioners, susan Parks Department staff. The last item before you today is a quarterly update on the landmark work designation program. The items that have come before you and expected to come before you in the next coming months. I will give you an update on the projects and what we are tracking. As you see from the first page are the tracking. Two items by the board of supervisors and signed by the mayor this past quarter. The hall and the goldberg building. The article 11 change designation from category 4 to 3 was approved for 149, 9th street. This changed the the designation for the university mount and added another Property Building to the work program. Department staff expects to bring the second hearing for University Mound and the board out building along with four landmark negotiations in the next 6 months. The initiation to include the Presbyterian Church and the initiation for the piece and plaza will come before you as well as the Community Reveals the designation report. It will also come before you once the Property Owners have reviewed the tax credit option. During this recording corridor, Department Staff have received two Property Owners submitted for landmark designation application. The files which you just heard are 2215 leaven worth. Staff continues to work with the applicant to finalize that application. Staff continues to work on the landmark designation as the landmark district cafe floor and none of these applications have been submitted to date. In addition to the landmark, Department Staff also serve and Technical Support on the committee. Staff is currently working on the following reports. The African American historic content statement and lgbtq content statement are expected to come before you in early fall. Statements are still being reviewed by staff and also working on a landmark designation for sacred heart church. Current team is working on the grant which is phase two on the commercial corridor survey and working on the commercial district. At the november 19th hearing staff recommended your support to further status of article 106789 we are still unable to create a report but tracking the measures. The first measures to develop a landmark within 150 staff hours, staff have exceeded that number for the american hall which is 265 hours. Performance measures two was to prepare an article 10 with an application hosted pot website this year. Performance measure three was to provide comments to the applicant regarding application completeness or schedule a hearing or Community Sponsored application. As a correction to your packet, Department Staff met the requirements to submit applications during this period. This is tracking the date tr submittal to the hearing instead of submittal date to staff comments. Performance measures four presenting a work Program Status every 6 months but we are continuing with a quarterly report. The next expected august 15th. Lastly staff has spent 30 hours for the landmark work designation program. We just discussed the service team active cases and then we can prioritize our listing projects. This concludes my presentation. The team and i are available for questions. Commissioner haas . Thank you for the report. I was checking in on Sunshine Schools since that is back in our lab. Do we have an estimate of hours to complete . I think the Sunshine School has now moved to the list of pending cases. I dont think its currently being worked on. I dont think it is. Tim fry, Department Staff. That was jonathan land worth working on the data and it was going to move to sunshine once it is resolved. That is taking more time since we are coordinating with the community on a few outstanding items. It is sort of next on the list. Yes, its cued up. Thank you. Public comment . Any other questions . We will now take Public Comment. Is there any Public Comment on the landmark work program. Seeing none, well bring it back to the commission. Commissioner pearlman . Thank you very much. This is so helpful. Last year we had one landmark. The marks bookstore. Its nice to see we have two already this year and kind of a whole lineup. So we are actually making a lot of progress. And thats one of the goals that weve set out over the last year to make that happen. So i wanted to thank you and jonathan for doing that. Thank you. Thats it. Commissioner johns . I want to thank you for what i thought was a very helpful and very well done report. Other too would like to echo your comments that this shows that we have for a while longer than i think any of us wanted we would be called, but we are now moving forward with this. Thats very very gratifying. Thank you. I have a question for the other commissioners and when i think about the landmarks work program, one of the purpose of adding landmarks is for protecting buildings that could be of any threat. One building we might consider prioritizing is the mothers building at San Francisco zoo because its been vacate for a long time. We know the bathhouse burned down recently and that might be a structure that we might want to give attention to. Im concerned that parks and recreation. Some of the other buildings are not threatened. Mr. Fry . Commissioners, tim fry, Department Staff. I think thats thai great comment. The Fund Committee called to issue a report through art to evaluate the condition of the murals and what it would take to rehabilitate the building. While my understanding is they are not complete with the study, this maybe a great time to bring in recreation and parks and arg to have them give the commission a presentation on the status of their analysis. One of the main reasons weve been holding on is to wait for the results of this document and it maybe a good time to refresh everybodys memories. If you are all open to that, i can reach out to recreation and parks and see if they are available for you. Invite them by all means. [ laughter ] commissioner johnck . That is an interesting comment because i know im thinking back over the criteria that weve recently reviewed for prioritizing landmark work on bringing landmark to it and of course the modernism of what was we are seeing today as examples is great. But this idea about threatened or the criteria about threatened, im wondering what else are we missing. I remember the mothers building, we did discuss that. But to take any further action like what you are recommending right now. So, i would certainly be in favor of bumping that up and as you say we are going to have a discussion with recreation and parks and i would ask staff if there are any others or i would look at it too and say what else maybe like that. Commissioners, if i may, one other thing that isnt art articulated in this report. The center soma area plan will be coming before this commission i believe in the spring of next year. We are approaching that plan similar to the Transit Center area plan where we did bundle of some designations to bring forward to you for initiation. So early next year while its not listed here at this time because that information is still in draft form because environmental study is under way. The last count is between 30 and 35 buildings at once. Some of them are located in the 5m site and some throughout the plan area. But thats also something to keep in mind too. I want to thank staff for the high level of professionalism for the report that you have done and the landmark work that has been done and the data. Its impressive. Thank you. I think that is our last item right . The hearing is concluded. Commissioners, just to remind members of the committee that well be reconvening here momentarily. 2 00. [ meeting is adjourned ] you. In landing a contract with the sfoifk is pretty champ but now with the opened Contracting Center visitors can get opportunity at the new state of the arc facility and attend workshops and receive oneonone Technical Assistance and learner what you need to become a primary contractor or what information to be a subcontractor and a created bed Public Commission it will help people to assist people to compete for and performance open city contract a lot of Small Businesses do have the resources to loblth the opportunity so one of the things we wanted to do was provide ways to access contract access to the plans spiefkz and a data place basis ease contracting opportunity and funding or capital training. This is and other documents that needs to be submitted. To compete is a technical skill that it takes to win a scheduling for a popular to you can win a professional services job or how to put together a quote its all those technical pieces. Looking at the contracting Assistance Center is our touch point with we get the people to come and see the planning specks and later than about projects earlier is he get training so youre ready to go arrest hello engineering it has all the tools that a contractor small or large can come here. I cant say enough about the center its a blessing. We do business all over the country and world and a place like the Contractor Center to identify the business in San Francisco the reality is you need training and thats what the center is here to train and make you Better Qualified to go work with the city and county and to be successful at the end. That will give people the Competitive Edge e edge at receiving contracts with the city. We have krafshth services here that help you find out where you need to get the skills forbidding. I mean local businesses participation in City Projects is a winning factor it helms help the business their local businesses theyre paying savings and a property tax and payroll tax and normally adhere san franciscans so their bowing goods and services in San Francisco it really helps the economy of San Francisco grow so its not only a benefit to the project but to the city. The Contractors Center is 5 thomas melon circle in the bayview area open 8 30 to 5 welcom