Section 6751(b) Penalty Approval Circuit Split - Tax Authorities

The Eleventh Circuit's decision in Kroner v. Commissioner[1], is the latest opinion to address section 6751(b) and, specifically, the appropriate timing of the supervisory approval of a penalty.

Related Keywords

Arizona ,United States ,Georgia ,Montana ,Nevada ,Alabama ,Idaho ,Alaska ,Washington ,Florida ,Belair Woods ,California ,Oregon ,Hawaii ,Laidlaw Harley Davidson ,Laidlaw Harley ,Sales Inc ,Tax Court ,Appeals Office ,Laidlaw ,District Court ,Davidson Sales Inc ,United States Supreme Court ,Seethe Cannon Corp ,Tax Court Decision ,Eleventh Circuit Sides ,Ninth Circuit ,Eleventh Circuit ,Harley Davidson Sales ,Circuit Courts ,Second Circuit ,Civil Penalty Approval ,Court Decision ,Not Satisfied Where ,Circuit Decision ,Supervisory Approval Occurs ,Before Assessment Section ,Harley Davidson ,Davidson Sales ,Ninth Circuits ,United States Supreme ,Cannon Corp ,Mondaq ,Section 6751b Penalty Approval Circuit Split ,Tax ,Tax Authorities , ,