comparemela.com


The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £2,000.
While in practice as a partner at Lawrence Stephens Solicitors, in relation to the litigation he was conducting on behalf of client A, the respondent had made misleading statements to the court in a witness statement and in doing so had breached principles 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the SRA Principles 2011.
The respondent’s misconduct had been the result of an inadvertent error and carelessness; there had been no planning; there had been no financial motivation, and there had been no breach of trust, though there had been a breach of duty to the court. It was a single episode of brief duration in an unblemished career.

Related Keywords

John Owen ,Biplab Kumar Poddar ,Administration Of Justice ,Apex Solicitors ,Adjudication Panel ,Biplab Kumar ,Lawrence Stephens Solicitors ,Apex Solicitors Limited ,Bradford Chambers Business Park ,New Lane ,Bradford West Yorkshire ,Justice Act ,Augustus Street ,ஜான் ஓவந் ,பிப்லாப் குமார் போட்தர் ,உச்சம் வழக்குரைஞர்கள் ,பிப்லாப் குமார் ,லாரன்ஸ் ஸ்டீபன்ஸ் வழக்குரைஞர்கள் ,உச்சம் வழக்குரைஞர்கள் வரையறுக்கப்பட்டவை ,பிராட்போர்டு அறைகள் வணிக பூங்கா ,புதியது சந்து ,பிராட்போர்டு மேற்கு யார்க்ஷயர் ,நீதி நாடகம் ,ஆகஸ்டஸ் தெரு ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.