Were watching all of the International Coming to you straight from the russian capital, a very warm welcome to the program. Well, starting us off this hour with the french president s ruling party house with a true one, a parliamentary bill that would have severely restricted the filming of Police Officers. Opponents, named 24. 00 would have violated press freedom and allowed the police to cover up acts of brutality. The apparent utang follows 2 weeks of nationwide a rust it, it it president macron. Chad and the movement see meeting on monday as part of that meeting, there was the french prime minister, the French Interior minister, and also the leaders of the parliamentary parties of the majority, the president s of these parties. Now they decided following that meeting, that this specific article, article 24 would be suspended from the bill. As i say, it follows a weekend of violent protests in france where more than a 130000 people came out to the streets. While the anger that we saw in those protests had been focused on 2 incidents in the last 7 days, which showed extreme versions of police brutality. The 1st was a week ago on monday evening. Here in paris, when police were showing him videos using brute force to dismantle a migrant camp with one journalist saying that he had been attacked 3 times during the evening by the Security Forces as he was trying to carry out his job. That was described as shocking by the interior minister and there was an investigation. And then the 2nd incident was that of a black music producer here in paris, who was shown on security footage being beaten up by officers. Now the 4 officers involved in the incident have since been suspended in turin, custody, but the reality is many say that without these images being broadcast, then perhaps they wouldnt be any comeuppance for the police. Even president machen said that that image of the black producer who was just trying to get into his studio, being beaten, was shameful, and more diffuse. It was very hard when they fired tear gas. I was at the back. I tried to call my lawyer. I tried to call a lot of people, even a neighbor heard my screams. He called me and asked whats going on. I explained its been attacked and he wanted to call the police, but it was the police. Its outrageous. I cant even tell you what im waiting for. I wish, of course, that this never happens again to anyone. Whether there are cameras or not, it should never happen. The police are here to protect us with journalists and dangers. It criticised article 24, saying essentially gave the green light to Police Officers just stop them from doing their job to stop them from filming. It had been previously backed up by the government to said that this was needed to protect the Police Officers who have been facing unprecedented levels of violence. The Police Unions that said this more didnt go far enough. They wanted something stronger. But of course, that now has been back tracked with the announcement that this particular part all school 24 will be completely rewritten. The former interior minister, who is a president of the parliamentary group, Christopher Cassidy said that it was the parliamentarians and must be the guarantors of fundamental rights. And this is freedom of expression and freedom of the press. A Human Rights Group powers accused europe of creating its own guantanamo by allowing its citizens to be subjected to human rights abuses. I count syria according to our rights and Security International report. There are a 640 European Children and 200. 00 european women being held illegally. And without charge, kurdish one camps for terrorist suspects in the northeast of syria. The report contains eyewitness accounts of inhumane and degrading treatment. Takes a look. Just look at this sea of tents enormous dubbed in the report as the new get mo, europes kuantan, a mole because of the citizenship or the origin of many of the families there. But heres why this place could outdo the infamous prison in reputation for the horrors happening inside. And pretty much every tent. There are kids since the start of 2019, more than 400. 00 children have died in the main camp long after eisel was wiped out. And this part of syria families of suspected terrorists are paying the price some die because of gruesome conditions. It can be anything from bad food to tent fires. Last winter, 3 and children were burnt alive. We saw the bodies, so the babies. If someone dares to speak out against the conditions, the guards, as its been reported, resort to gunfire, we never feel safe here. My main worry is that my children are injured or dying from gunshot wounds. One day a bullet landed between my neighbors tents. Im afraid of the bullet enters my tanned and winds of one of us. One children, especially boys grow older. They could end up being forcibly removed, just in case 2 men in military uniforms who had their faces covered with these cards and carrying kalashnikovs and very fast. They took my son who was asleep. I screamed, they said, dont scream. Local authorities have admitted they are removing troublemakers, which could be justified by the detainees all in violent behavior. At times, imagine scuffles between those who reject eisel ideology and those who remain brainwashed. Its an explosive mix. The question is whether the threat from these clashes is an excuse for any humane treatment bordering on torture. The Syrian Democratic forces that are running the camp, say such practices are banned, but they are admitting mistakes and keep complaining about the resources they have or lack to keep the whole mess under control. Well soley responsible for the safety and security of thousands of families of militants in the whole camps. Something for beyond a modest capabilities due to the failure of the International Community to cooperate with us and their refusal to repatriate this. Its so where do these families belong . Who bears the ultimate responsibility for the woman and children . Many of whom never chose to be an islamic state, but ended up in its jaws. E. U. Members dont want the families back flying them as a security threat, revoking citizenships. It is more than turning a blind eye, the states actively engaging in a policy that is leaving these people in these dire conditions outside of the law. Theyre actively doing it because theyve said that the security approach is to leave them. That this is a Strategic Policy, it is a moral aberration to have a Strategic Policy which is leaving mostly children in a Detention Camp to die. There is no easy solution and maybe there is no way out europe with its own sleeper cells and unprecedented numbers of terrorist attacks in recent years, isnt looking forward to any extra fuel on the fire decision was that the dutch government does not have to pick up these children and these women from syria right now, what the judge says is that this is a political decision, and that it is not up to the judge to decide whether they should do this or not. I emphasize that a National Security threat means the threat of the most serious kind to the public. The resists serious risk from anyone whos aligned with ours. So so for now, unfortunately, it looks and navigable that more blood will be spilt in the sea of tents. U. S. President elect joe biden has announced his pet, the White House Press secretary announced with almost all of his nominees so far its a familiar face from the former obama administration. As atis, caleb maupin explains well, presumptive president elect joe biden has achieved whats being hailed as an identity. Tarion breakthrough with an all female press team, and it will be headed up by and none other than Jennifer Psaki. Now folks will remember. Jennifer psaki from 2013 in 2014, when she was a spokeswoman for the u. S. State department. And she actually became notorious for a number of her, a number of her blunders that she delivered from the state department podium. Lets review Jennifer Psaki career. There are flows of gas, the natural gas, i should say, they go through from western europe, through pain train to russia, and we are, im sorry, the other way from russia, through ukraine to western europe. And i dont have anything, any specific comment on the case that point to the egyptian government. And i was very due to have a conversation with the department of justice. I dont have any teeth and in state prison, so i dont have any things there. And i dont have more details on who are members of russia and see no evidence to the crew who are 2 russian. Sorry, i said, methodology was also highly suspect with reports of parents including premarked ballots, which are still listening to this is those reading that im not familiar with that is from either way. It may be that people werent checking out, check and see what was our team and specifically made that interview. Thats the way to sort of the issues the answers. But i dont think its a reference to that is, this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many other examples of misc sakis, mindblowing way with words. However, she seems to have taken it upon herself to regain the trust of the American People. Take a listen. I cant imagine a smarter to say theyre bad, a human to prison with than a karine gen pierre, to build trust of the American People communicate the biotin, harry said shanda and make the work of the Us Government more accessible to the people who go. Jennifer psaki is not the only individual in the new White House Communications scene who will have come out of the obama administration. For instance, youve got the Communications Director for the white house as well as the Communications Director for the 1st lady, both being individuals who worked with joe biden when he was vice president. And, when he was a u. S. , senator. Furthermore, youve got the deputy press secretary, being someone who served in the cabinet of the obama administration. And its important to note there is one outlier. There is an individual who will be serving as a Senior Advisor to camila harris, who did come out of the Bernie Sanders campaigns. However, this individual is the exception. Now in addition to their ties to the obama white house, these individuals seem to also have pretty clear ties to us Mainstream Media. Jennifer psaki herself, has been a c. N. N. Contributor, in addition to that, youve got corinne jeanguy here. She has worked as a political analyst for m s n b c and n. B. C. News. Now, Simone Sanders has been a c. N. N. Commentator before she moved on to the biden harris campaign, and she will also be part of the Communications Team of the biden harris administration. So lots of familiar faces from the obama era and from us Mainstream Media will be moving into the executive branch and working in the media team of joe bidens president ial administration a couple and a straight a how they launched a needle challenge off to that child was taken into calf following the parents refusal to allow to reassignment therapy. Well be discussing that story with our panel off the break. The world is driven by dreamers shaped by one person with those words. Thinks we dare to ask anyone else seemed wrong . Why dont we all, just dont all get to shape out these days become active and engaged because the trail when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. Welcome back. Now a couple in australia are appealing against a Court Decision to take that teenage child into a cab. The parents have refused the teenage daughters request to change gender and faith that being bullied by the authorities into giving their consent. The Authorities Say we will not allow her to change gender, so its dangerous for her to come back to our house because we will mentally abuse her. They want us to consent to tests or string treatment. The child who cannot be named for legal reasons was born female at the age of 15, she told her parents she wanted to become a boy. And when the parents refused, she openly contemplated suicide in online posts and was then taken from her. d home by Child Protection services, the case has sparked widespread outrage. The end of parenting as when you, we have no rights. Our children can be seriously harmed by the government and medical profession. And we are powerless to stop it. Im so sorry for what our society is doing to your family for have been they fled to slide this far. Happened in my family. After age 14, parents have no right to medical information or their children. Tragic. Well lets bring in our political commentator, gina luton commentator on lawyer Stephanie Haden and womens rights advocate, reese of a certain good to have you all on. Well, we thought this is clearly something that has sparked a lot of criticism, a lot of discussion. You know, i want to start with you in cases such as these and we do actually hear that, you know, this is not the 1st instance where a child is asking to change gender. Who gets to make the decision . Well, it should always be the parents, unless you know there is a history of abuse. Thats to monster pull and proven in the course. You take a child at their most vulnerable age and you take them out of what is secure. We all know that teenagers make irrational mistakes. Thats part of being a teenager. Most of us can look back at our teenage years and say we made some very irrational decisions. And that without the guidance and loving support of our parents, and no one loves us more than our parents, in most cases, we would have made worse mistakes. So to rip, that authority away from parents is often the worst mistake that the courts can do. Stuff and i want to pick up on some the genius you all, we all know, we all make mistakes, not sure i was reading about. d a case in england, a woman said that she, this is an adult woman in her twentys. She said she made a mistake. She decided to false to have agenda reassignment surgery. She now regrets it and shes been contacted by dozens of people. So what do you say to that . Maybe the child is going to quicken too. Its a parents job to protect them. Well, there is always the excuses and say that we start from the assumption that somebody who received in cells has been transgender, is somehow making the mistake that they dont understand their own minds, that theyre not capable of making a rational informed decision. Its the sort of nonsense we used to hear in the eightys over gay people. The fact of the matter is this. Every case has to be considered on its merits. And i would not particularly to see somebody 15 or 16 to be incapable of making an informed, rational decision. I would, however, consider someone for all find years of age incapable of major not decision. It comes down to the, into the digital child who has autonomy with their doctors and yes, ideally with their rental influence and pay rent and support. What were got support is not there some time. Suddenly it is necessary for the authorities to step in aris, i want to bring us now in out the parents of that child say that theyre being bullied into consenting to testosterone treatment, in your opinion, is that any justification for putting such pressure on the nickell gardens on the family. Absolutely not. And i would say i would take it a step further and say not only are the parents being bullied, but their rights are literally being stripped away from them by the government. In this instance, in australia, when you have parents who are, you know, any teenager 1514 year olds who are logging in one line, we know that from our own experience, mind personally, and just from family members that teenagers get online. They log into chat groups and they say, you know, things that are how they feel. And also sometimes those feelings are not solidified. Theyre just passing thoughts because a, you know, teenage teenage hood is an emotional time kubert. His emotional time were literally pumping with you know, emotions and so to say that a child whos 12 years old has decided that they want to identify a certain way and that the parents are now going to be forced to allow this child, to have poor move their r. P. , i mean it literally slaps in the face of what the purpose of a parent actually is, which is its a guy and provide instruction in correction. And right now these parents are being stripped of that. In general, i want to come back to you. Obviously, stephanie was making a distinction between a 4 and a 5 year old and a 15 and 16 year old, you know, 16 year olds, for example, me, us in some states can drive they can get married with parental consent as well. Do you think its possible for a child to someone under the age of 18 to give an informed consent to sexual reassignment . You know, because we dont let children that age make decisions about having a simple blood test. We dont let children make other decisions, you know, and the argument is, when you consider things like, you may want a child whos 10 to a child. He was 10 years old, may want to drive or they may want to become an evangelist who goes to north korea to do their evangelism in a parent might say no child, youre 10 years old. Thats a dangerous decision for you at 10. Thats why we have parents wait until youre 18, and then you can do whatever you want. The thing about this is, this is really politicians in black robes making political decisions. When you consider the science, the real science, we know that is sometimes these decisions people can regret later in life, as you pointed to initially, when you look at science that says, you know, theres conflicting science on whether steak is healthy, whether salt is healthy, whether wine is healthy, there is conflicting science on whether these sorts of chemicals being given to children are healthy or not. So let the child wait until hes an adult to make a decision that may affect his health, his or her health for the rest of their life. If theyre just waiting a few years, the parents should be the ones who lovingly walk them through this. Not a doctor, not a court. No one should trump the authority of a parent in this situation. Stephanie, i want to come to you. We have gina talking about Long Term Health impacts. Now chris sex hormones are available to 16 year olds in most western countries. They, can cool, according to the n. H. S. , new pay, prominent in tennessee. Now sure, weve got something only an adult can decide to do to themselves knowing all the information it comes down again to informed consent. And also when do we consider a human being to be an adult for the purpose of making, these decisions . Here in the united kingdom, in certain parts of the u. K. , wales and scotland, 16 year olds can vote, they can make a decision on who wins this crucially. They can be members of the armed forces of the can actually fight in any, you know, wall street people who met and of the armed forces. They can pay taxes. They can marry with a rental consent if were going to allow as a society 16 year olds to make those very mature decisions in my opinion. Then as absolutely outrageous to take this bonkers, Old Fashioned view that children are somehow out of the chattels of their parents that are not the children have autonomy. They have agency and providing that they are mature enough to make the decision with suitable guidance from professionals. And yes, i mean, dealing with their mental import, then that should be the decision of those individuals. Again, we wont, you need to, on the line. Would she not argue, for instance, that i am homosexual. Children should not be able to decide that their own sexual because they might just be having fleeting feelings, or they might make decisions. Which theory pret later my, the fact of the matter is most people who transition transition successfully and it helps their mental health, their physical health and their overall wellbeing. Of course, like anything you heard have, you know, one or 2 which we dropped it and we had a case in the u. K. At the moment involved and care about is now. And its also where that was the case, for that is quite rare. And this for that should be the divine of o. T. , just because they gave birth to the channel to similar opinion. Cases, misconceived reese, i want to come to you now if refusing hormone therapy can become abuse or not. So what that we hear a lot, especially in the media when its talked about, do you think theres an argument to make that thats a distraction from cases of quote unquote actual abuse, why children are at risk . Absolutely, and heres the thing. So because of the way that the system is set up when a parent, when a child says to their parents, i believe that im a girl. You can, if that child is 8 years old and theyre physically a male, the, the current prevailing practice is to allow that child to determine what they want to do Going Forward if you, if the child is in therapy. If the child is seeing a doctor, but we are all told that the policy Going Forward now or parents are told it, the policy Going Forward is to allow that shout to determine what they are and to say anything different is considered abuse to say, or to provide guidance or instruction or wisdom in this manner, or even what may be the parents have a religious belief if the parent says you are what got me to be that is considered abuse by these standards. And so what were realizing is, is that, you know, freedom of religion and just the basic rights of a parent are literally being stripped away and being concerned, the definition of abuse is being conflated and being very hard used in a way thats harmful to actual children who are being abused, and if and to to imply that some of the young lady, the other young lady, maybe the age of consent is 16. So why would we start out loud . 8 year olds and 12 year olds to make adult decisions. The reason that egyptian sin is 16 for allowing a child to have sex is because we dont want to allow children to be exploited. Or we dont believe that they have the capacity to consent to a sexual relationship. So if you cant consent to sex, how on earth can you determine that you are old enough to want to have a misstep to me at 12 and have your breasts removed or you want to have your gender reassignment. All these are things that a 12 year old and a 13 year old dont have the capacity to understand the longstanding implications of in some of the issues. Because as you made clear there are students, people like Patrick Mitchell who changed their agenda or from male to female and in realized no actually should be employed. So it were teen years old. Hes now trying to go fly to korea in order to have his sex change undone. And so these are beings that, you know, appearance should not be allowed or should not be compelled to force their children to just more of these they should be allowed to wait and see. Can i just also want to use a final question really quickly . Do you know what do we do than how do we provide a way out for children who are suffering from judging to display . What should happen if theres a conflict with parents really quickly please . Will the burden should fall on the parents to make the best most loving decision for their families . There are 2 things going against children. In these situations. One is if theyre ripped from the loving arms of their parents, and 2 is if theyre forced to make a decision to young that they might regret the suicide rates are astonishingly higher. Your other guest was wrong about that. For children that make these to sis decisions, the younger they are when they make these decisions, the more high the suicide rate is for them later in life, once theyve transitioned to. So we need to be very careful about these children being exploited for political reasons. Was saddam something thats got a lot of people talking like you so much . 3 of you got was gina newton. Stephanie hate to have a son with good to see thats all from us. Ill be back at the hour. Hope see them join me every thursday on the all excitement. And ill be speaking to guest of the world of politics. Sports business, im show business. Ill see you that always be polite, never engage with a negative, a good or confrontational. Dont get into any conversation or start answering questions. Just ask for an attorney to survive and territories. Definitely dont want to be going to trial. Youre more likely to walk free if youre rich and guilty, or if youre poor, and youve got 2 eyes and 2 ears and one mouth. So you should be seen in here and a whole lot more in your sand. If you dont take that advice, easy going to dig yourself hello and welcome to cross top where all things are considered. Im kidding about the Foreign Policy team of a potential buy in ministration is being touted by the liberal media. We tell you why all this should be horrified also theres a lot of talk about a great reset and build back better does looking bad or bode well for the future