On important Foreign Policy issues today europe has a choice to defend its interests or fade into oblivion. Crosstalk in the Atlantic Alliance im joined by my guest mark allman in oxford hes the director of the Crisis Research institute in london we have Jonathan Steele hes an International Affairs commentator also in london we have a real because he is founder of a consulting and Foreign Affairs analyst all right gentlemen crosslike rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate mark let me go to you 1st here and let me just read you 2 quotes here number one of course before its too late and we have the new head of the European UnionsForeign Policy arm he he also says europe must develop quote appetite for power in the trump era theyre both hinting at the same thing in Different Directions here what does that tell you Better Change course before its too late whats that mean to you. I think certainly the tensions between russia and the west in general are really part of the tension russia in the United States and we can see that actually inside the European Union and the european members of nato there are quite sharp divisions between the east european states who live with historical enmity and resentments against both russia and the russian the soviet union. And then the west european states including germany france and so on for whom a russian threat doesnt really exist anymore but who are paying a price through sanctions and economic losses for the grand a strategy of the United States to keep russia in its box and so there is a tension about where youre going to go because if this situation of a new cold war between russia and america continues is your really benefiting from that if it isnt which europeans are going to make and yeah i mean just to decide to move in a slightly different direction marc makes a very good point i mean that the tensions are primary between the United States and russia and europe as usual finds itself in the middle with a mixture as marx pointed out here but that is not a proper way forward that is the that is paralysis and as i said in my interrupted introduction they have to start defending their interests or theyre really going to become irrelevant because we have the rice of china the closer relationship between moscow and beijing where is europe in all of this go ahead jonathan. Well i think im glad you mentioned china because i think one of the main factors is the Munich Security Conference i mean theyre trying to develop a new people in washington trying to develop a new cold war this time with china as the enemy as well as russia and it was important to the Chinese Foreign minister came and responded in reacted quite severely against most United States had been sorry i mean europe does not want to get involved in a russian incident american crusade against china europe must stand free from the bottom thats why its important britain has agreed to take technology for its 5 g. Networks isnt going to be intimidated to a bloated as United States to give up on that. Weve already seen when we look at the iran policy that the trumpet ministration with substantially and ill use the word blackmailing european cars automotive producers to put a tax tariff on their cars if they dont toe the line i mean jonathan says you know theyre there theyre bucking that trend but i mean it gets kind of leads into where i want to go in the rest of the program is that you know the u. S. Still has that so many levers and coercive levers against europe that they dont toe the line go ahead in london. Thank you thank you for mentioning this and thank you for all the previous partners that you mentioned china because as we know it was not about russia it was about the china we know that. There are realistic Foreign Policy thinkers in the United States including John Mearsheimer who was present in 2015 and my very own university in poland you know you dont university told us about this very moment that we have the right where the unit European Countries and china. In one bed when it comes to trade and investment so it will cause a frictions we know that as we look at the democrats on both sides democrats and republicans the prime goal for the United States to contain china and china is the number one. Objective will start to dig somehow. Problem for the United States and as. Told to the audience in my alma mater the university is russia will become part of balancing coalition so i dont understand why the United States is somehow. Both china and russia but in my opinion it might cause slightly different effect same as with sanctions on russia for the ukrainian crisis which was according to john. Very famous a realistic thinker course on the side of the. On the west not on. I mean you could also throw in these a antagonizing russia and china but mark antagonizing europe is well ok that thats my point right here out here and this is in this is why im doing this program because i think the transatlantic experience is being seriously 10. Here because i would make the argument at least 100 theyre more interested in trade they were interested in europe i Energy Policy and oh ok you have to buy all these arms because you know theyre theyre important to american politics but they dont see it as a Security Threat this is this is a gambit for resources and denying trade to others this is what this is about and europe is being tested here go ahead mark you know i think if we can historically really from the Marshall Plan and post war more war policy towards western europe the United States had to deal with the european allies that in many ways who are now as we do well economically the political line and so there was a cost benefit to both sides now trump and pompei are basically saying to the europeans you got to pay up profiting and theres no more free rides but want to say that no more free rides people dont have to assemble is one of the costs of having normally when we get more able what do we get for that exactly whats that real turn for them. If i can i jump in and so go ahead to the point if youre going to jump in like tell you im sure that all the panelists have noticed that europe is divided between all europe and new europe and when i write an article before 1017. 00 addressing this issue it is to calls down to the baltic pipeline and the revenge and the revenge a sentiment in the eastern part of europe which was somehow colonized by dissolves union and as we can see german french and other western nations are reluctant to previous commentators rightly said to participate in that because they are realistically assessing the cost of this participation of oil and also the moral cost of participating in the iraq war but eastern European Countries are driven by slightly different parameters and as i said when it comes to the whole stream too we can see that the American Government of the American Administration is heavily subsidizing. Pipeline invented by the polish government and in 2017 we know that the 1st transit of ellen g. Gas was delivered to show you know we share in more than poland and board by the state owned oil and gas Company Called p n g n g so we know we try displaying all you have all the hopes in the United States you know driving a wedge between the old europe and new year old and new europe is willing to spend more money on American Natural Gas than in russia and thats really logical in these these times of austerity jonathan i mean the crux of the whole thing is that the European Union are we can just say europe geographically cannot have a coherent trade in Foreign Policy if theyre not united and i cant see how theyre going to get united in light of what we just heard about the new europe go ahead jonathan you know i agree. Real chance of unifying Foreign Policy in spite of the fact aspires to be one but i mean i think we have to look to mark ronson inside of us to some extent because micros the only current leader of a major country in europe have the courage to say we need dialogue with russia russia is part of our geography russia is part of our history we have to have good relations with russia and hes trying to find some kind of independent Foreign Policy initiatives to bring russia into the picture and sanctions on russia because of ukraine and so true and defies the United States or macron as the great white hope i think for the European Unions efforts to create more independence and more even i would say resistance to the United States well its interesting market now that were in a crowd it seems to me that he what he weighs emulating the goal essentially thats what he wants to do goal is that his return to france but will it work and or this guy go ahead. Work out i think to some extent its opportunistic but then thats the reality of all politics any successful politician moves with the time see which way forces are going and recognizes that his domestic difficulties means that he has to get in a sense distance himself from being seen as a classic globalist and a list reorientation of french Foreign Policy which has economic benefits would also perhaps help him in his reelection bid so theres a rational self interest the really interesting case is going to be britain i think because with britain leaving the is britain going to become completely reorientated towards the anglosphere and become even closer to the United States its been already or theyre all reports obviously that Boris Johnson had a row with trump over huawei that are further reports that maybe the chinese will be invited to save our ridiculous expensive high speed rail way project because at least they will build it in 5 years or older than 25 years and so we are beginning to see even between the british and americans or certain divisions between our natural tendency to be politically aligned and the economic interests which are increasingly diverging and including not least the. You can only benefits of trade with china which were china is not perceived as a threat to britain in the way that the United States sees around the pacific rim china is a threat to its traditional role in that whole region ok jonathan 30 seconds people ready to go to the break can they be that compromising middle europe when it comes to china and the United States go ahead im going to should certainly try and not sure how successful they can be british and certainly try and visit on a spirit of can have good relations with russia china and the United States well together. Well the interesting question is to be an honest broker i mean on the one hand i think thats what we would all like and that certainly would be in europes interest but you would offend probably both the United States and china at the same time it seems like a lose lose situation and well discuss that more in the 2nd half of the program were going to go to a short break and after that short break well continue our discussion on the Atlantic Alliance stayed with. I 1st heard about weeks you know songs from. Helicopter footage in iraq. I think it down to the people. I mean u. S. Military who have never forgiven him for this guys a traitor a treasonous and and he has broken every law the United States illegally should. He was really he story to have. Independent journalists with his computer to see you is what crimes and to a global audience. The idea of developing an anonymous. And applying it to a Media Organization is what he makes that was the 1st. Didnt the toy anticipate that he would be for a short while world right and wrong one of the worlds most will use it as a standard for founder Julian Assange. And there was a great deal of jealous in the mainstream towards him particularly why wont he be more like off that you seem. To cease on the walls. We have Julian Assange in solitary confinement in the prison for terrorists to await him perhaps alive in person or. I dont want to see him die in a u. S. Prison. And i think thats what hes facing. Yeah. Welcome to cross talk where all things are considered im Peter Lavelle to remind you were discussing the Atlantic Alliance. Because i could really in london you know i find it was a few months ago i found it. Amusing that the New York Times would write an editorial that trump probably should consider improving relations with russia which you know after all weve been through with this ridiculous hoax and the demonization of anyone that has you know if you have russian. Salad sauce you know youre suspect somehow. Making light of something it is very serious here but you know you having some you know the New York Times saying you know maybe trump should consider doing that because of the embrace with china i mean this has been going on for years now that that horse has left the barn i mean i find it astounding that the political establishment is saying well maybe we should reconsider i mean decisions have already been made and the reason why im mentioning that because europe is going to have to make that decision its because its so do divided internally its never going to be able to sit down and choose one side of the other and i think its going to be the net loser in. All of this here but in a going back to some of the things that you know as mark was saying you know what the we history holds europe back when i look at the baltic republics in poland in all that when the future is screaming forward at you at high speed and i think europe is going to be left with of to the side because it really is the United States china with the chinese russian liant and it is an alliance now go ahead and rail in london well i totally agree with you peter this is even from the geopolitical political point of view the real realists in in europe know the powers like britain and United States have slightly different interests when it comes to. The future or the well being of the land powers including hands europe china and russia but we have to bear in mind that european peons were quite reluctant and lazy after the 2nd world war in you know taking their own matters in their own hands they somehow took the back seat and they were silent observers all for what their leader in the western hemisphere read United States is doing regardless where the. Morally justified or not but somehow now they they see the young generations are quite displeased with the deadline the leader in the western hemisphere hemisphere is showing to also we have to bear in mind that Everyone Wants to participate in the great revolution that no logical revolution and. Historically we know that china never attacked europe so so why we should be afraid of them why the United States is putting so much emphasis on you know blocking who are away from entering the European Market market why do offering to. Subsidize their european competitors read nokia and ericsson it is not a friendly this is this rule no its not strictly business because you know its the im watching wants to determine who has a backdoor into everyones computer in europe thats what they want big theyre afraid of chinese spy no they want to do the spying themselves ok because you know you can trust starts you can trust those to spy on you not those chinese i mean it is so ridiculous and so hypocritical here mark i want you r. T. Mentioned something i think is really interesting with break that how does this the Atlantic Alliance as weve known it over the decades how does that change because i think you could see you could see europe being alienated by the u. K. If it gets too much into bed with washington and it doesnt matter if trump is president i think people but way too much into that historical trends that are happening its not that doesnt matter but particularly who is in the white house go ahead mark you know in front ironically trump in the white house pushes parts of the British Government to form still be closer to the European Parliament and ited states one could imagine a new american president who follow broad Foreign Policy consensus was awful trump has actually as hes always pointed out been tougher on russia tougher on china than his predecessors and so in a sense he set a precedent that will be followed which is indorsed by the Foreign Policy establishment in the states the only area his policy they support the problem for the british would be that it is awful likely that theyre going to be asked to pay an economic price for what in many ways comes culturally and for historical reasons if not for the churchillian romanticism of the transatlantic worship comes naturally to us and so i think it is likely to be the case that these trends inside continental you countries particularly the west european powers of the to seek to have a more sensitive european centered policy not. Because with britain they can have to pay more for these things the french the germans the dutch and so on will have to pick up the slack so youre going to get a consequence that in practice will be tensions inside or between the east european states that are all very conservative style for historical reasons to russia and also supported by u. S. Policy and then these countries were truly all the economic heart and the taxpaying heart the e. U. That will be much more talked about those poles here i mean big cities. Youve already mentioned and i mean i mean people you know i agree i mean part of the cold war settlement you know that europeans would get great trade deals with the United States true and i understand why trump wants to for the perfect sense theyre ok but what you get who gets what for what is the question right here and i dont think polities but in the powerhouses of you as you put it i dont think they they really have an incentive to spend more why where is the threat whos threatening us i mean of course the you know the roots of phobia in the u. S. And the u. K. Who are well known well known but i dont see in times of austerity what you want to disable or the major keep going yeah the major Security Threats of course come from come from north africa come from the chaos in libya that we helped to cornells so and so that sense if you will the average french or italian citizen or more of danger of being killed by weaponry and bombs coming. Liberated intervention states where we cause chaos and then you are from russia or china and that is a big problem in Public Perception we dont the average person doesnt see what the think tanks see as the sort you know jonathan that jonathan i think one of the interesting things here is that the United States and the Atlantic Alliance that they have gotten so used to having such a heavy. Having had gemini for the last 7 decades that they dont understand how to reimagine the world that they dont have it and i think it is the lack of imagination and. How the world is changing and i think it terrifies them i mean the new cold war which i just look at their rhetoric they go back to the same rhetoric we need to have a cold war we need to have an enemy and the world this evolving so quickly why do you necessarily have to have an i mean we have to we could look at the extent you are talking you talking about the United States i dont think europeans and european governments feel or want to come along with china that is going to raise a rift between us and europe on that one was me i mean having spoken in the 1st part of the program of the macro during the right thing hes doing the right thing but in the wrong methodology hes still talking about the state using military power hes hinting that knowledge theres only one Nuclear Power in the European Union now that britain sniffed because of bricks that its very Old Fashioned 1000 century thinking to think about military power being the most important element of a countrys Foreign Policy we need much more soft and i mean speaking up looking for mediation particular in the middle east i mean mom and mark common mentioned libya and north africa but what about the central issue of the middle east which is israel palestine i mean trump has just come up with a military the most outrageous socalled peace plan and europe has been almost silent about it britain indeed has protected us at the u. N. Security council from being criticized were going to must speak out on the central issue of the middle east which is palestine we must start bringing sanctions to bear against israel responded quote some of the produce it comes from their own occupied territories disgruntled should be the year of getting back to a promise to neutralise the main issue which infects everything in the middle east you know its interesting if we go to a drill and i want to on the back of whatever jonathan just said there i agree and disagree with jonathan l. Quibble and one thing. Falling back on these traditional levers of Power Military but actually i think its more cynical than that because what you saw at the munich conference is basically the export. Forcible export of of western values and that forcible export is the military here and i think that that is something that i find the height of hypocrisy is that talking talking about values while maintaining and wanting to pursue head gemini and i think that makes those false values youre actually maintaining a gemini based on things that. Are a facade ok you know its my way or the highway thats what it this is and thats coming to an end theyre scared about it go ahead. Well. Again i agree with you. Professor somewhere huntington who has written who wrote a very famous clash of civilizations. Said to us the west didnt you know win the war by the superiority of its ideas values or religion it was the superiority of organized violence post on nonwestern countries that gave the supported superior attitude to the west and previous commentators that i think we think the United States 2 or the anglosaxon world is having a slightly heavy mental breakdown from the. Perception of the world where the america or the you know some. People aware of the leading force which was you know helping other countries or other nations to somehow stand on the ground and be much more civilized in a brackets as we can see that all civilization caught china is far beyond technologically and thats why we can see people like you know Mark Zuckerberg participating in uni you know when we dont really interesting here is instead of talking about the new cold war its really the new orientalism thats really what it is ok i find it really fascinating because its inherently racist which of course the west never could claim that its not races that we shouldnt back raises a point that way they look at the entire world is racist how could the chinese run the world oh my goodness you know a nonwhite country having had gemini in the world oh my god you know this is what its all about nobody wants to admit that we instead what they should do is negotiate in mediate for once and good for. Thats all the time we have gentlemen many thanks to my guests in london and in oxford and thanks to our viewers for watching us here see you next time and remember. The Russian State TelevisionPropaganda Machine propaganda outlet propaganda tools we are in an information war. We can change the world. We send out you tube videos the sleepless nights you today its the longest network. Close your brush with russia russia and russia today is. The only t. V. That will choose russia to live and im really happy to join to see you then on our team. Who are so proud and still. Are just getting the numbers. Why have you not shut down our t. V. On you tube its a Propaganda Machine mr walker. In the United States president ial candidates debate the future of the u. S. And the world. Max keiser and Stacy Herbert dig into the burning questions of this election cycle oneself every week. Tax student debt trade was corporate money universal basic. And more catch up with whats front running this sunday exclusively on r. T. Today day. Story. Word. Is here. Waiting to be reached. Turkish airlines. Breaking news the turkish president announces a military operation in the syrian province of idlib a scribed a matter of. Such actions are the worst case scenario. Where australia then pays visit Julian Assange is in jail and put on the u. K. Government to stop his extradition to the United States warning about the wiki leaks founder stick to the racing condition. Easy to bring signs of disorientation. He didnt tell us about the campaign severe oscillation and ongoing. So u. S. House of representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi would see a you against working with huawei branding chinas tech john david