For are the language of iran and of course north korea and russia so that would be a bit of a sort of give away about which countries they want to be targeting. In time donald trump drew condemnation worldwide in the week when it was reported on friday reid launched into a foul mouthed rant in the oval office about it were groves several democratic lawmakers who were there claim the president was deeply disparaging about people from Central America and africa. This implicitly Strong Language itself salvador and other countries you could see with express our strong protests and then the jets acute close ups of state its. Just incredible declaration because those supremacist graces the freshest expressions like the ones that donald trump abused people with nothing to. Be shocking shameful comments from the president of the United States. Im sorry but theres no other word one can use but the racists. Took to twitter to deny the actually used those particular words but admitted the language he did use in the meeting was tough there was another shot of trump to diplomacy to on thursday when he announced he was canceling next months visit to britain that was he was due to open the new u. S. Embassy in london but pulled out he says over the cost of the new location of this building although there could be more to it as reported. This is what all the who is about is the new u. S. Embassy in the area of nine elms which is being regenerated in sort of an embassy quarters. The public next week donald trump was supposed to arrive in february or was widely expected that youd be cutting the ribbon then thats not happening any more clearly the old building of the u. S. Embassy on that was on the sort of grand old square in the very heart of the city in the center of mayfair which many people know is the most expensive location on the monopoly board but the interesting thing about the president s tweets is that there was a slice error and he accused the Obama Administration of selling that old building for peanuts it was in fact the Bush Administration before him and there have been suggestions that this whole embassy rau is a way of diverting attention away from the fact that perhaps the president didnt feel like he was going to be particularly welcome here in the u. K. Almost two Million People has signed a petition against him coming here claiming that most british reason of. It would embarrass the queen donald trump arriving here and the marriage of london hasnt been too welcoming either take a listen to what city khan has had to say about donald trump it appears that President Trump got the message from the many londoners who love america and americans but find his policies in action the opposite of. This just reinforces what a mistake it was for its a reason to rush and extend an invitation of a state visit in the first place however dont try to kind of appear at the new embassy there it is easy it looks kind of realistic this pretty Good Business works well what works for the construction workers and the. Structures from londons Madame Tussauds museum which couldnt resist the marketing opportunity we spoke to a senior local labor Party Official meantime who says its clear the Tribal Council because hes worried about facing protests. We know that its because he was going to face you know huge protests when he came here hes a deeply unpopular man. And there were going to be hundreds of thousands maybe a Million People on the street this is the kind of pressure the dont trump would be facing if he came over here and he doesnt have the spine to take that you know he as soon as someone insults him hes straight on twitter i dont think its going to alienate his support base you know there are a lot of angry people out there and trump has manipulated back into into a support base and hes been wholly disingenuous about it but he has managed to whip up a lot of just content about the the drawbacks of globalization how globalization is not working for everyone there are some left behind people and those left behind people flocked around trump. Incoming missile people know why running for cover this weekend would tell you all about. What after this break. Some Animal Rights activists are just upset that we eat meat period which makes no sense by the way because animals eat other animals and were supposed to be equal with animals but suddenly they dont want to humans eating other animals so in a sense theyre saying that animals have the right to eat other animals but humans dont have a right to eat other animals even though they think were all equal so some of theres a logical inconsistency there. What do you suppose. They put themselves on the line they did accept the reject. So do you want to be president. Some want to. Let you go right to be this is what would. Be good. Interesting. Question. And what a story this was behind me is the kind of text you do not want to get from the government officially telling you to make a run for it because the missiles incoming will be a ballistic one but thats the message received by people across the y. Saturday spot of course people fleeing for cover. Well it took about half an hour actually for the authorities to scramble and confirm that there wasnt nothing to worry about it was a false alarm while local congress one woman tweeted that there was no incoming missile the message was sent out it virtually some of pressed the wrong button as they put it the authorities have apologized and said it was caused by an employee as they pressed in the wrong flag that the head of hawaiis Emergency Services explained why he knew it was an january. I saw this today when i heard a story i thought something was wrong it was a false alarm really because the tensions were not there to to start Something Like this lets get the view from doctors freedom charlie whos the dean of the gentle school of International Affairs he wouldnt be woken up or said the bear with a message like that say would you i mean the official line at the time was it was a press of the wrong button which is careless to say the least or is there more to it do you think maybe a dry run for the volley of Nuclear Threats between donald trump and kim jong un and my reading too much into it or certainly i think there is a lot of panic alarmism thats going around. The United States despite being a superpower has been spawned by rocket man and i think the build up in the media and probably even and. John has grown into the minds of the consciousness of people so even if it was a technical error in the wrong button that was suppressed i think it shows how much it is no confidence in the American Society and wont the governments ability to predict its own citizens you know people if this is like the core of water rights it may be people used to look for clunkers and save. And do the drills and the rigs so why actually is protected by u. S. Pacific command they have made me sad interceptors in alaska in california and of course unable to flee dollar own and so ideally and rationally they should not be panicking when the fact they are actually or the not quite easily managed to rattle the americans like no one has and the size difference between them makes it all the more are preposterous initially donald trump was criticized for not getting back in apologizing or saying about this seems the white house says the president was briefed on what theyre calling it Emergency Management exercise but if thats the case it sounds like it was a test and actually was done kind of purposely a lot of what do you think. Its quite possible i mean the American Government and agencies have often played games with their people and created scarce in order to test how the response mechanisms are and theres an oral history going back to the boardwalk for this but i think super the timing of this is totally wrong they should not be doing these things because right now in martin south korea however approach mark and they are looking forward to a little bit coarsely promise eat all that and i want your objections of the United States south korea has gone ahead and extended a hand of friendship not good with this is the time for be escalation of tensions not to keep this thing why really you nor the more you put all of these kind of news stories. In the media i think its going to keep the tension going and to continue that image of north korea as an enemy steve there has to be conquered ertl military force and also a lot of the right problem because that problem of crying wolf you know will people take notice if it pray god ever did out and hope it wont dr dean the general school of International Affairs solely by the short their time. Other news for the week has gone Russias Defense Ministry announced on friday that it had killed the terrorists behind a mortar attack on russias air base in syria issued a video in fact showing its strike on the militants positions. For in that attack happened on new years eve and left two russian officers dead days later the base was targeted for a second time by more than a dozen drones that attack was successfully repelled with no casualties or damage. Elsewhere. The shops of clothing retailer h. And m. Have been a focus of protests in south africa the firm was branded racist earlier in the week over a picture of a black boy in a hoodie with the words coolest monkey in the jungle printed on it. Crowds of to demonstrate is trashed. Its going down really badly the retailers already removed the picture and apologized but that doesnt stop the backlash people on social media were outraged as well. Marketing agent templates a black child in a hoodie that reads and the coolest monkey in the jungle and the white child is the survival expert and fox have pretending like they dont know the black children have long been racially characterized as monkeys. I highly doubt they will like lets put the monkey when. Theres a white supremacist who works for the thought it was funny to make a model that said. So stunning about from this a bit was racially insensitive lets get a preview from. The week from spike magazine and also. Shes from models of diversity. The whole issue is with this earth ties in campaign its an Advertising Campaign that international is an International Campaign and its so obvious that if youre going to use a connotation like monkey whether a child is a monkey youre going to choose a black child hold for the campaign and the white child as a survivor of the jungle there is not going to have connotations its ridiculous to think its not going to have any contagions whatsoever i think is a really sad i think what has happened is the word monkey has been used because this boy is a child and the word monkey is used to describe children of all races because theyre cheeky and mischief first and you can see this across childrens clothes for children of all races and this was part of a jungle themed clothing line the idea that this was somehow racially malevolent i think is utterly ludicrous im so disappointed by this campaign ive seen them do they always use a mix of models but this is really not you know its time to say the least its what this campaign is its really badly thought out by a board of white directors because even if it was even if theres that opinion its just like buckley thought it might be parents that are negatively thinking about this you cannot to not buy the connotation that it held i dont think this has that connotation for the vast majority of people the vast majority of people think this is a perfectly innocent campaign involving children of all races involved in the jungle and that conversation when our mean time back to that is the way that we look thanks for watching the way clear enough to International Wont ever know it weve got great programs lined up for you right after this short break. Well be willingly accepted the real skill of being sharp wounded taken prisoner. But noone has signed up to be friggin poisoned by our own people ive seen that was nuclear biological and Chemical Products the said do not truck tires all types of styrofoam polystyrene batteries trucks there was a complete denial i think at all levels of government that there was any connection between burn pits and what these brave soldiers were suffering from to compensate every soldier marine airman and sailor that was on the ground that are complaining about illnesses from their exposure from the burn pits would really literally send a v. A. Broke and they dont want to pay it so the way to the decades a lot of those soldiers will die in time and they will have to pay and. Paltrow to get the middle finger the movie is to model is. Delayed and i hope you dont. Join me every thursday on the alex salmond show and ill be speaking to get off of the world of politics sports business im show business ill see you than. What politicians do so you can. Put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. So when you want to be president or injury. Or somehow want to. Have to go right to the press as a white woman for three in the morning cant be good. Im interested always in the waters in the house. This should. Welcome to worlds apart indivisible security in europe has been a diplomatic talking point for decades but the lack of agreement on what it means or how to bring it about has contributed to a number of conflicts including the one in ukraine has the violence in effectively buried the idea of security for all or has it on the country and made it more viable to discuss that im now joined by Thomas Browning or the new secretary general of the organization for security and cooperation in europe this agreement here think here very much for your time has been roughly since month since month since you accepted the position pledging to reinvigorate the organization to specifically focus on dialogue and reviving trust. I wonder if the practical reality of the past six months has perhaps. I think. Assumed this office i knew very valuable. Expecting me. Five familiar bits you know you see. One of my previous job so i was the Space Program for percent if. You in here you know for five years i chaired the Permanent Council in two thousand and fourteen. I chaired it then we started the crisis in around ukraine so im very familiar of it this institution im familiar with its processes youre familiar with the challenges to. Your fan talk about the restoration of trust as the key to the effectiveness but what makes you believe that the organizations they call theirs have reached a point when they valued that trust over their immediate policy objectives. Look i think one of if not the key challenge it in your atlantic and your Asian Security these days is this historic deficit of trust between stakeholders and basically be neat. Form. For inclusive style the need to place very can gradually rebuild trust among the Key Stakeholders and i think this takes us innovate a bit back to your actions off to see you see the need was create to manage these very difficult east este relations story in the cold war now those are difficult relations deteriorated even further in ukraine and i know that you made your crane the first country that you visited in your official capacity this is also was the place where the trust or whatever had been left of it. Broke down completely i think over the efforts to either preserve point. Change ukraines geo political standing do you think at this point of time four years into that conflict the sides have come to. Their readiness just sort of harmonize the stances of the geopolitical envisions not yet i mean issue look. Total impasse in implementing. Im not seeing a political commitment. To get out of this current stalemate. On the Positive Side we have managed successfully and here. I think very. Significantly to prevent or for address collation of the conflict but of course the would want to resolve this conflict and for days i think we need. The political commitment to implement both sets of clauses the security related provisions and the political probations of the minsk agreement but with all due respect i think the whether or not the conflict escalates further depends not so much on the oist even though the mission is highly appreciated by the on the actual. Parties or the International Backers. I heard you stayed in one of your interviews that you regret the return of zero sum mentality into a European Security and i heard the other experts suggest the conflict is in ukraine is actually unique in being a lose lose situation reach makes the parties compete not over how much they gain but actually how much they make the other side lose and when you look at that from that perspective the potential for hostilities actually hasnt been exhausted it goes far beyond ukraine and this is what i want to ask you about at this point do you think this conflict is contained to ukraine or its. Southern part or do you think it can still go farther than that. Well i think the conflict is typical of a situation that. Got me into after. Its. Stability. Security order in europe that is now more and more put into question and. The torch in conflict in two thousand and eight was a first indicator of fact and innovator cries in or around ukraine is is another symptom of this underlying fundamental problem that we face in European Security well if i may be bringing back to the question that i just posed about whether you think the conflict can expand beyond the current war theater i think its clear that. They are sort of two tracks to that conflict one is can i think on the battlefield and they the other one is by inflicting economic and diplomatic pressure and im sure you know that the United States is about to introduce another round of sanctions against russia which ukraine is highly supportive of though formally speaking it has nothing to do with ukraine do you think that kind of economic pressure that kind of remote. Well i wouldnt call it war but still the efforts to apply pressure to each other do you think it could have a direct impact on the battlefield. The relevant. We have on the table are to mean agreements and i think. That they need to implement thats very clear there are number of underlying issues. Can only be addressed half implemented then. The have sorted out the Current Crisis in around your crane. I think there is absolutely no way. Around doing doing that you often point out that you believe that there is no way around the agreement and yet im sure you know that many in ukraine believe that that deal was reached under duress and therefore should not be implemented i know you met present Pressure Cooker recently i wonder if you have any ideas on how to incentivize him to publicly accept the validity of the minsk agreement which he cannot afford to do or hasnt done publicly within the ukrainian environment or perhaps to incentivize them to look for other alternative solutions look i think this is a conflict that is extremely expensive. To all sides all sides for. Profit from implementing. Grievance and i think the trick is. This is a complex set of security and politically related provisions and we need to. Agree on a road map on how to proceed in implementing them and i think once of course the more progress we make in stop issuing a sustainable ceasefire. Its easier it is obviously for president bush and co to settle also the political provisions im fully aware that this is not obvious now i know that you personally. Valda negotiating this go for the oil special Monitoring Mission of which it has been suggested may need to be complemented by an arms u. N. Mission and it seems that the disagreements over the scope of the u. N. Mission have been a doll and over the past month at least russia says that it no longer objects to the u. N. Monitors having access to the entire war theater but provided that if the breakaway republics agreed to that in direct talks how big of a hurdle you think that letter requirement with be do you think key of could bring itself to engage directly with the breakaway republics on that specific point of the u. N. Mission i think there is indeed a potential to come out of this impasse of implementing. It by. The u. N. Operation. As you have alluded to there are still there is still quite a gap between the concepts. I think of that in the context because what i see is russia actually changing its position on the scope of the you know mission and he is still sticking to its original point and moscow suspect that this is a way actually off not implementing in the other pretext for not implementing the minsk agreement because if youre interested in peace why is it such a problem to sit down with the breakaway regions again they did that format so why not do it again. See the sites camping on initial positions. But i do see a potential of marrying that up. And i do hope. Eventually manage. Obviously. Will be very keen to be. Associate to do any planning of such an operation from the very outset after all the been of working in the area for three years. Also i think in a position to come to if you would all the civilian assets to such an operation in German Foreign minister. Just earlier this month that germany together with france would promote this idea the u. N. Security council of which ukraine is not a member and i want to ask you as a former perhaps the current diplomat as well where do you think that deal on the u. N. Mission. Should and would be hammered out is it among the ukrainian parties or principally among their International Backers no i think the basically. Bill. Needs to be a common understanding first by the side. Of. That type of operation that. Really clearly the need to. Be part of that they need to. Come out of this. Exercise of narrowing the current now do emphasises that it does not want to see any russian c. S. D. Or c. I. S. Troops among the peacekeepers and i think even in russia some people would fully understand their reluctance to see the russians but do you think the idea of excluding all or most of the neighboring countries is sensible and consecutively. You chair a pretty Large Organization the reach of the members could be perceived as natural parties. I think were not there yet and i think its also when. We see it tend to exclude or include specific contributing cant you know for an advice. I mean of course. This is a very sensitive. Politically what contributing countries to believe in chile offer troops there is no doubt about it. I think there has been a tradition in Un Peacekeeping that states to have. Conflict. Or not should not be part. After to contribute troops and i would see the shortened stick to dr in support of the lives of members like countries like kazakstan or even bellicose which hosted the agreements should they be considered as somebody who has a stake in this conflict or somebody who has a an expertise both that the russians and the ukraine. Today i think its off to the sides to decide to whom they have