Review found 'falsified data' in Stanford President's research, colleagues allege

His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.

Related Keywords

Stanford ,California ,United States ,New York ,Australia ,Taiwan ,Salk Institute ,Rockefeller University ,Israel ,Brazil ,Canada ,Michigan ,Washtenaw Community College ,Australian ,Stephen Neal ,Paul Greengard ,Aidan Ryan ,Davo Vaux ,Marc Genentech ,Kirkland Ellis ,Anatoly Nikolaev ,Matthew Schrag ,Marc Tessier Lavigne ,Nikolaev Linkedin ,Anatoly Maurer ,Susan Willson ,Genentech ,Committee Of Publication Ethics ,Stanford Board Of Trustees ,World Intellectual Property Organization ,Florida Atlantic University ,National Academy Of Sciences ,Genentech Research Review Committee ,Research Review Committee ,Stanford Board ,Publication Ethics ,Nobel Laureate ,Nobel Prize ,Elisabeth Bik ,National Academy ,President Marc Tessier Lavigne ,Stanford President ,President Marc ,Magdalena Skipper ,Not Contribute ,Disease Related Pathophysiology ,Murine Models ,Scientific Integrity ,Special Committee ,