Retracted studies the latest in a decadeslong abortion-science fight

The nation’s highest court is unlikely to consider ambiguities in a decision that could have repercussions beyond reproductive health care

Related Keywords

Amarillo ,Texas ,United States ,South University ,Georgia ,Idaho ,California ,University Of California San Francisco ,Kansas ,Missouri ,Texan ,America ,James Studnicki ,Susanb Anthony ,David Cohen ,Ronni Sander ,Tessa Longbons ,Ushma Upadhyay ,Davida Shaneyfelt ,Ivan Oransky ,Charlotte Lozier ,Erik Baptist ,Chris Adkins ,Matthew Kacsmaryk ,Donna Harrison ,Committee On Publication Ethics ,Drexel University ,Revenue Service ,Us Supreme Court ,Supreme Court ,Attorneys For The Alliance Defending Freedom ,American Association Of Obstetricians Gynecologists ,Alliance Defending Freedom ,Drug Administration ,Health Services Research ,Circuit Court ,York University ,Charlotte Lozier Institute ,Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine ,University School Of Pharmacy ,Supreme Court On ,States Newsroom ,Sage Journals ,Services Research ,Pro Life America ,Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ,Hippocratic Medicine ,Internal Revenue Service ,American Association ,Pro Life Obstetricians ,California San Francisco ,Publication Ethics ,Managerial Epidemiology ,New York University ,Retraction Watch ,South University School ,Counsel Erik Baptist ,