comparemela.com


Rethinking the Classic 60/40 Stock Portfolio
When I started working in capital markets 20 years ago, an investor seeking a “safe haven” could purchase a 30-year Treasury bond yielding better than 5%. The high-quality corporate bonds that I bought for my employer (a major life insurance company) often paid more than 7%. 
Times have certainly changed. For much of 2020, 30-year Treasury bonds were paying in the mid-1% range, though they have since climbed to a “lofty” mid-2% level. A corporate bond buyer is lucky to get 4% today for lending money to an investment-grade American company. 
Today’s flat bond yields pose a two-fold problem for retirees and those approaching retirement. First, investors buy bonds to generate steady income to fund spending. Second, bonds serve as a means of hedging, or offsetting, the risks associated with stock ownership. That is, when stocks are flagging in a market downdraft, bonds generally tend to do well as investors move away from riskier investments in a “flight to quality.” 

Related Keywords

Camp Hill ,Pennsylvania ,United States ,Maryland ,American ,James Adams ,Brown Schultz Sheridan Fritz ,Danny Glover ,James Adams Jimmy ,James Lafferty ,Member Of Advisory Services Network ,Classic Portfolio ,Advisory Services Network ,Private Wealth Advisor ,Brown Schultz Sheridan ,Waffle Street ,Global Financial ,முகாம் மலை ,பென்சில்வேனியா ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,மேரிலாந்து ,அமெரிக்கன் ,ஜேம்ஸ் ஆடம்ஸ் ,பழுப்பு ஶுல்ட்ஸ் ஷெரிடன் ஃப்ரிட்ஸ் ,டேனி குளோவர் ,ஜேம்ஸ் லாஃபர்ட்டி ,செந்தரம் போர்ட்‌ஃபோலீயோ ,பழுப்பு ஶுல்ட்ஸ் ஷெரிடன் ,வாப்பிள் தெரு ,உலகளாவிய நிதி ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.