The NCLT allowed it to participate and submit the Resolution Plan to maximise its value. However, it said this opportunity shall be subject to compliance with the provisions contained in CIRP regulations. However, as there was a contradiction in the NCLT order on the one hand, it allowed submission of the resolution plan by JPL for maximisation, but on the other hand, it sought compliance with the CIRP Regulations, and the RP requested clarification from the tribunal.

Related Keywords

India , Mumbai , Maharashtra , Tuticorin , Tamil Nadu , , Committee Of Creditors , National Company Law Tribunal , National Company Law Appellate Tribunal , Jindal Power Ltd , Jindal Power , Tuticorin Coal , Mumbai Bench , Tuticorin Coal Terminal , Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process , Resolution Plan , Bankruptcy Code , Corporate Debtor , Coal Terminal , North Cargo Berth , Nclat , Plea , Insolvency Appellate Tribunal , Bid ,