comparemela.com

The purpose of this article is to offer for discussion the changing landscape of the Army’s Civilian Career Management. Huge civilian management decisions are currently underway with no inputs from Army senior leadership. These changes, done in a void, lack a clearly defined problem to solve and no in-depth studies have been completed. This will potentially cause serious long term negative effects. The loss of the SES led Functional Advisor (FA) team undermines the value proposition of our civilian workforce. The lack of strategic processes and Army process driven guidance is leading the Army Civilian Career Management Activity (ACCMA) down a path of irrelevance and a potential return to the status quo ante of 2010.
Strategic discourse offers an opportunity to for Army Senior Leaders to add their voices and help shape what needs Army Civilian professionals require to transform into the Army of 2040. First the article will overview strategic documents and highlight the difference between those documents and a research study. It will then walk through the current decision process and the removal of the SES functional advisor from ACCMAs decisions and discuss the tertiary effects of those decisions.

Related Keywords

Winston Churchill ,George Santayana ,Smithsonian American Art Museum ,Career Program Analyst ,Army Civilian Career Management Activity ,Cf Program Analysts ,Department Of The Army ,Senior Executive Service ,Emission Analysis ,Impactful Career Development ,Career Program ,Cf Program Analyst ,Senior Army ,Civilian Career ,Functional Advisor ,Career Field ,Research Studies ,Historical Context ,Career Programs ,Its Limitations ,Implementation Plan ,Business Board ,Military Decision Making Process ,Potential Issues ,Career Program Manager ,Position Descriptions ,Functional Advisors ,Civilian Career Program Analyst ,Army Civilian ,Career Development ,Changing Needs ,Functional Communities ,Senior Leaders ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.