comparemela.com


Editor:
    I appreciated the March 25 article “Authority Mulls Chipper Versus Burner” (Rio Grande SUN page A1).
    We have a great opportunity to move forward with a chipper. No air or waste pollution is created with a chipper. There is not a $50,000 annual expense for hauling off the ash. The wood chips are very useful for landscaping and gardening because they hold moisture and are attractive. They can also be used for erosion control.
    As members of the Velarde/Alcalde Firewise Community, our mission is to educate our residents about ways to keep our homes safe in the event of a wildfire. One of the most important activities is to remove shrubs, trees and weeds that are near any structures and to leave space between trees and shrubs that are farther out. This can produce a huge amount of green and brown waste. Right now the burner is unable to handle this in a timely manner. A chipper is much faster and more efficient.

Related Keywords

Judith Chaddick ,Gloria Romero ,Ben Lujan ,Peter Fuller ,Ohkay Owingeh ,Velarde Alcalde ,Evelyn Maruska ,Roger Montoya ,Diane Pola ,Carlos Valdez ,Firewise Community Board ,Authority Mulls Chipper Versus Burner Rio Grande ,Central Solid Waste Authority Board ,Velarde Alcalde Firewise Community ,Mulls Chipper Versus ,Rio Grande ,Alcalde Firewise Community ,Alcalde Transfer Station ,North Central Solid Waste Authority Board ,Authority General Manager Peter Fuller ,Buzz Danial Toy ,குளோரியா ரொமெரோ ,பென் லுஜன் ,பீட்டர் ஃபுல்லர் ,ஓகே ஓவிங்கே ,ரோஜர் மோன்டோயா ,கார்லோஸ் வால்டெஸ் ,வேளருதே அல்கால்ட் ஃபயர்வேஸ் சமூக ,ரியோ கிராண்டே ,அல்கால்ட் ஃபயர்வேஸ் சமூக ,அல்கால்ட் பரிமாற்றம் நிலையம் ,அதிகாரம் ஜநரல் மேலாளர் பீட்டர் ஃபுல்லர் ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.